Based The concept of sexual consent only applies to sub-8 men

[metabuxx]

Consent just gives a false assurance to people that they are in control of things which happen with them. When in reality nothing is in our control. Plenty of events and coincidences add up to the things that happens with us which is in no way influenced by our approval to occur.

For instance I never consented to being born but here I am living this subhumans life full of misery and suffering.

So when women talk about "consent" it doesn't means jack shit. When Chads force themselves on women, no one questions whether it was consensual or not. But when a sub-8 man even tries to approach women, the dormant question of consent re surges back into existence.

The events which made the non consensual sexual act between Chads and foids unquestionable dates back to the Stone Ages when a woman's brain was hard wired to prefer alpha men to breed with TO the day when Chad met her and decided to grope her without asking her permission.

And unfortunately women were never programmed to select sub-8 men to breed with which is why the concept of consent only applies to us.

Foids were never in control. They are just slaves to their biological urges and the chain of events which has programmed them to act in a certain way.

 

[Deleted member 24166]

Rape = sex with an unattractive man

 

[metabuxx]

Rape = sex with an unattractive man

Based

 

[Words2_live_bye]

Rape = sex with an unattractive man

 

[beta_max]

Rape = sex with an unattractive man

 

[UselesseatER]

Consent is for cucks

Rape = sex with an unattractive man

 

[Napoleon de Geso]

Teen girl can consent only to teen chad

 

[Wizard32]

when women talk about "consent" it doesn't means jack shit.
When Chads force themselves on women, no one questions whether it was consensual or not.
But when a sub-8 man even tries to approach women, the dormant question of consent re surges back into existence.

This is easier to demonstrate when we look at kissing in fiction.

Yeah there are occasional times when a foid will initiate a kiss, or a guy will ask permission first before kissing her, but usually the guy just kisses her and she swoons.

That's the stereotypical thing that gets foids wet.

Sex would not be ANY different.

The double-standard here is basically a foid will probably admit that they gave consent via body language to Chad (subtle cues) yet if a sub-8 kisses them by misinterpreting/imagining such cues, they will decry that the standard is enthusiastic recurring verbal consent, and dismiss non-verbal consent as a factor at all.

 

[metabuxx]

This is easier to demonstrate when we look at kissing in fiction.

Yeah there are occasional times when a foid will initiate a kiss, or a guy will ask permission first before kissing her, but usually the guy just kisses her and she swoons.

That's the stereotypical thing that gets foids wet.

Sex would not be ANY different.

The double-standard here is basically a foid will probably admit that they gave consent via body language to Chad (subtle cues) yet if a sub-8 kisses them by misinterpreting/imagining such cues, they will decry that the standard is enthusiastic recurring verbal consent, and dismiss non-verbal consent as a factor at all.

High IQ

 

[Personalityinkwell]

If you're a man does a woman have to ask to have sex with you?

 

[metabuxx]

If you're a man does a woman have to ask to have sex with you?

Nope. All women have to do is touch their crotch area without their permission and every man will gladly fuck her.

 

[Numb]

"sub 8 = incel" idea makes a lot of sense when I see what the average .co poster looks like lmao

 

[based_meme]

Seeing this wave of high IQ threads damn near brings a tear to my eye.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

Nope. All women have to do is touch their crotch area without their permission and every man will gladly fuck her.

Yeah it's BS.

Legally speaking though don't they say you need to say "yes" or it's rape?

 

[metabuxx]

Yeah it's BS.

Legally speaking though don't they say you need to say "yes" or it's rape?

It is technically rape if a woman touches a man inappropriately without his consent. But no one recognizes it as rape. In most countries the law still say that rape = "forceful entry of a penis in a vagina", not the other way around.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

rape = "forceful entry of a penis in a vagina",

so therefore a woman can never rape a man because she doesn't have a penis

 

[MartinLutherCoon]

Rape = sex with an unattractive man

 

[metabuxx]

so therefore a woman can never rape a man because she doesn't have a penis

Exactly.

 

[Wizard32]

In most countries the law still say that rape = "forceful entry of a penis in a vagina", not the other way around.

so therefore a woman can never rape a man because she doesn't have a penis

You guys might want to specify which nation's laws you're talking about.

For example the 2012 Federal definition in the US: https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/blog/updated-definition-rape
“The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”

So it is possible to charge a woman with raping a man if she puts a non-penis object into his anus without his consent. Like for example if she jams her finger (or a dildo, or a strapon, or her tongue) into your anus.

It's a step in the right direction, but the main problem is that it still doesn't cover "forceful envelopement".

1) it is rape to put your dick into woman's mouth without her consent, but it is NOT rape for a woman to put her mouth on your dick without your consent
2) it is rape to put your dick into vagina without consent, but NOT to put vagina on dick without consent
3) it is rape to put your finger into vagina without consent, but NOT for woman to grab your hand and push your fingers into her vagina

Fun fact though: it would not be rape to slap your dick on a woman's face, or ejaculate into her ear/nostril/eye because of this definition's specifics. This would fall under broader "sexual assault" laws, so obviously don't do it.

One thing I don't really like is that apparently it's rape to put dick in woman's mouth without consent but NOT rape for a man to put tongue in another man's mouth without consent.

I don't see why they should be treated any differently. STDs can be spread by tongues and in both cases you're putting a slimy undesired body part into someone's oral cavity without permission.