Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious The closer to the equator, the lower SMV the country. The further from the equator, the higher SMV the country.

Genetic Error

Genetic Error

Self-banned
-
Joined
Dec 11, 2021
Posts
1,896
The closer to the equator, the lower SMV the country. The further from the equator, the higher SMV the country.

Think about it.

All the truecel countries are on the equator- the shortest, darkest, ugliest, poorest

like indonesia, philippines, cambodia, kenya, somalia, some south american shitholes, india



And all the mogger countries - the tallest, lightest, most handsome, richest

like france, germany, denmark, netherlands, sweden, norway, switzerland



edit:

also i believe the people furthest north have the biggest biological fetish for the people furthest south and vice versa

its just only white men can take advantage of that, not ethnic men because of the fact the furthest north men are the tallest and the closest to equator men are the shortest
 
Last edited:
I think the reason is because people in the cold work harder. Changing season Civilations had to work during summer and prepare for winter. In Winter they often didnt had a Job and had enough time to thinking and to reflect
 
One word: evolution. People in colder climates had to be more resourceful to survive. Thus higher selection for intelligence, looks, etc.
 
One word: evolution. People in colder climates had to be more resourceful to survive. Thus higher selection for intelligence, looks, etc.
why would looks be important exactly?
 
why would looks be important exactly?

Uhm, seriously? Maybe because looks are associated with better health and, therefore, higher chance of survival?
 
One word: evolution. People in colder climates had to be more resourceful to survive. Thus higher selection for intelligence, looks, etc.

I dunno about that curry and rice mog most mayo in iq
nigger/sand niggers and spics don't even register on avg iq scale :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:

secondly high iq is actually more of a detriment to sexual success than helpful
higher iq = higher chance of being an incel
 
Abos must be giga slayers then
 
Not sure how reputable this study is, but is states this:
"male attractiveness was significantly and positively predicted by masculinity, symmetry and averageness and negatively by adiposity. Female attractiveness was significantly and positively predicted by femininity and negatively by adiposity."
It goes into detail on facial attractiveness and what we perceive the predictors of attractiveness to be (skin colour, facial symmetry, semen quality, testosterone, etc). It aims to debunk whether facial attractiveness actually is a cause of things that we believe attractive people posses, such as good immunity, hormonal levels, etc. It is still a contested point of study though.

We can safely say that when we seen a fat or disabled person we believe their genetic makeup is lesser than that of a fit, tall, wide-jawed individual. Regardless of whether that is true or not, we still select for the perceived best genetic material we can access.
Literally nothing about health
 
I dunno about that curry and rice mog most mayo in iq
nigger/sand niggers and spics don't even register on avg iq scale :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:

secondly high iq is actually more of a detriment to sexual success than helpful
higher iq = higher chance of being an incel
Curries have like sub80 iq in their own country lel
 
I agree. The height of people and technical advancement of these countries probably has something to do with cold winters, but I don't know exactly what.

As a currycel, this makes me want to put more of hope in the surrogacy basket rather than unlikely hope of finding a foid.
 
That's the point dummy. It's a perceived indicator, not a literal reverifiable indicator. We see pretty people, we think better about them and we associate better health, intelligence and behaviour with them. A good looking guy is charming and funny, an ugly guy is creepy and unhygienic. Studies have shown that there isn't as strong of a correlation as we would think, but people don't care as they still want the best genetic material.
dnr
 
Oh my goodness! You and @City Morgue are both fucking retards! Such low iq individuals! Can't even fucking read, or at least take the time to understand why you were WRONG! Ciao!
:feelskek:ight ok im wrong ur right, happy now?
 
Holy shit! I never noticed this...
 
Curries have like sub80 iq in their own country lel
shit hole country with a diverse demographic
few retard states like Bihar hold the whole country back
Any studies proving this?
yes there was I am sure you can find them on incel wiki
said something like high iq individuals struggle with finding love
 
I dunno about that curry and rice mog most mayo in iq
nigger/sand niggers and spics don't even register on avg iq scale :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:

High IQ curries are a small fraction of the population, most curries are dumb. With Asians, there is the same relationship between IQ and climate: northern Asians (Koreans, Japanese) are high IQ, while southern Asians (Indonesia, Thailand, etc) are as dumb as a bag of doorknobs.
secondly high iq is actually more of a detriment to sexual success than helpful
higher iq = higher chance of being an incel

I think IQ was relevant in early days of human evolution: if you can strategize to hunt woolly mammoth, good for you; otherwise, you're a toast. In today's soyciety, IQ is less relevant. We have a tiny fraction of the population (scientists, engineers, etc) largely responsible for technological progress, while the vast majority simple feed off their accomplishments. IQ becomes less important.
 
High IQ curries are a small fraction of the population, most curries are dumb. With Asians, there is the same relationship between IQ and climate: northern Asians (Koreans, Japanese) are high IQ, while southern Asians (Indonesia, Thailand, etc) are as dumb as a bag of doorknobs.


I think IQ was relevant in early days of human evolution: if you can strategize to hunt woolly mammoth, good for you; otherwise, you're a toast. In today's soyciety, IQ is less relevant. We have a tiny fraction of the population (scientists, engineers, etc) largely responsible for technological progress, while the vast majority simple feed off their accomplishments. IQ becomes less important.

lol high iq cuck now days are useful idiots, they made tools that allowed foids to be more hypergamous and easily get in contact with chad
 
Cold weather is overall just better for humans. Not only it promotes the evolution of humans and scociety (higher IQ, better looking people, resourcefulness) it also curbs foid's whoring instincts (they can't go around half naked anymore), which are detrimental to society. It's lifefuel.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top