The Brutal "no true romantic love" pill

[NapoliPizzaPie]

Here's a fundamental truth.

I bet one of the contributing factors for the reason why many of you are incel (of course, looks / attractiveness is numero uno, this might be an additional number) is the fact that you seek "true love." True "validation." "Mature love," "love beyond just flesh fucking."

After all, "why not get an escort" or a "prostitute" then?

But the truth is - this doesn't exist.

You were taught from a very young age by your culture and media that there's something deep about a man loving a woman. Having the same interests, being able to laugh and josh in each other's presence. To be able to wake up next day to someone who loves you for who you are.

This love doesn't exist. Or if it does, it's so unabashedly rare that it might as well not exist.

Women either settle down with a guy they want to fuck, or they are stable enough to settle down with. Men settle down with a woman they want to fuck, or whatever options they have available.

That's it. There's no science, esoterism, religion, philosophy behind it. That's simply it.

Here's the reason why you guys feel the way you do.

You are sexually scarred.

These feelings are immature. They are teenage and juvenile, but they are expressed in a more mature fashion.

But nobody ever gave you that. You could never eat ice-cream or have your parents take you out to the movies or have a sleepover and go swimming with a teenager of the opposite sex.

Most guys who do grow out of these naive feelings after having sex enough times or being with women long enough. Very quickly usually.


You are not above most people. You are below most people.


A woman doesn't want a fucking teenage-mindset man to "validate" them - they are repulsed by needy, immature, juvenile "men." They want a beast who can fuck or someone who makes sufficient enough money to raise kids with. That's it. They don't want a "shy" "geeky" "immature" guy. They want a winner.


So stop believing in the lie of "true romantic love." Two people want to fuck or decide "eh you are good enough to have kids with" and that's it. Period.


Ignore Hollywood movies. They are there to sway naive individuals into having more kids for the workforce.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

Lefot Chad ans shit theory

 

[Gone Coping]

nobody on this website believes in any of the shit you just said

 

[tulasdanslos]

The problem is that these are tropes propagated through even children's movies. Last week I watched Brother Bear 2 for the first time and the foid chooses the hero because he's kind and shit, and because they used to be friends as kids.
The most egregious part?
The hero loses a physical confrontation and she chooses the hero right after.

How do you even defend against this degeneracy, this twisted depiction of emotion? You'll just guard your kid, you say (Well not you OP, it's over for both of us). But how the fuck are you going to continue your lineage? This poison keeps being pumped out year after year after fucking year and there you have it, your dumbass grandchild let your grandgrandson watch a Warner movie and it's fucking over for you. Just like that.

 

[NapoliPizzaPie]

nobody on this website believes in any of the shit you just said

The problem is that these are tropes propagated through even children's movies. Last week I watched Brother Bear 2 for the first time and the foid chooses the hero because he's kind and shit, and because they used to be friends as kids.
The most egregious part?
The hero loses a physical confrontation and she chooses the hero right after.

How do you even defend against this degeneracy, this twisted depiction of emotion? You'll just guard your kid, you say (Well not you OP, it's over for both of us). But how the fuck are you going to continue your lineage? This poison keeps being pumped out year after year after fucking year and there you have it, your dumbass grandchild let your grandgrandson watch a Warner movie and it's fucking over for you. Just like that.

It continues to be propagated because, intentionally or unintentionally, it's meant to keep the bottom 50% of men complacent and not destroying the system.

 

[Deleted member 33091]

And it doesn't help that women lie and say that it's what they want. They always claim that they want to find someone that they love and overdose us on bluepills.

 

[Deleted member 33778]

And it doesn't help that women lie and say that it's what they want. They always claim that they want to find someone that they love and overdose us on bluepills.

 

[Ecstasy]

@Irredeemable opinionz on this?

 

[Gone Coping]

It continues to be propagated because, intentionally or unintentionally, it's meant to keep the bottom 50% of men complacent and not destroying the system.

what is it you think that image proves in relation to your post or mine

 

[NapoliPizzaPie]

what is it you think that image proves in relation to your post or mine

That, at least in terms of online dating is concerned, it's all about genetic preference and not "personality" or "deeper love"

Why don't you disprove what I'm saying?

 

[Gone Coping]

That, at least in terms of online dating is concerned, it's all about genetic preference and not "personality" or "deeper love"

Why don't you disprove what I'm saying?

yeah no shit you retard, nothing you have said is new. We were having these conversations on puahate like 10 years ago.

 

[NapoliPizzaPie]

yeah no shit you retard, nothing you have said is new. We were having these conversations on puahate like 10 years ago.

Jesus loves retards, so fuck you dude

 

[Irredeemable]

@Irredeemable opinionz on this?

OP is right "romantic love", is merely a social construct from recent times. Just lol if you think ooga booga cavemen 20k years ago thought about eating berries with their "oneitis" during sunset.

 

[Ecstasy]

Just lol if you think ooga booga cavemen 20k years ago thought about eating berries with their "oneitis" during sunset.

 

[ItsOver4cel]

water is wet thread tbh
And I couldn't care less about love, I'm just horny

The problem is that these are tropes propagated through even children's movies. Last week I watched Brother Bear 2 for the first time and the foid chooses the hero because he's kind and shit, and because they used to be friends as kids.
The most egregious part?
The hero loses a physical confrontation and she chooses the hero right after.

How do you even defend against this degeneracy, this twisted depiction of emotion? You'll just guard your kid, you say (Well not you OP, it's over for both of us). But how the fuck are you going to continue your lineage? This poison keeps being pumped out year after year after fucking year and there you have it, your dumbass grandchild let your grandgrandson watch a Warner movie and it's fucking over for you. Just like that.

tbh, I blame modern media in general for indoctrinating me and taking this shit to my brain while I was young, cuz I rly thought women were kind enough to overlook the flaws and value you for who you are jfl. Fuck, if I could meet my past self I would just tell myself to stop watching such soypilled garbage and go nutritionmaxx instead.

 

[Mecoja]

True 100%, i used to believe in "true love" because i was brainwashed by the stupid tv. Movies from 90s and early 2000s are the most bluepill brainwashing shit.

 

[RollD20]

You are below most people

Well thanks for clearing this up

 

[NapoliPizzaPie]

water is wet thread tbh
And I couldn't care less about love, I'm just horny

I don't "endorse" it because I would never endorse illegal activities, but you could buy an escort then; you would probably spend as much in a relationship.

The problem is that these are tropes propagated through even children's movies. Last week I watched Brother Bear 2 for the first time and the foid chooses the hero because he's kind and shit, and because they used to be friends as kids.
The most egregious part?
The hero loses a physical confrontation and she chooses the hero right after.

How do you even defend against this degeneracy, this twisted depiction of emotion? You'll just guard your kid, you say (Well not you OP, it's over for both of us). But how the fuck are you going to continue your lineage? This poison keeps being pumped out year after year after fucking year and there you have it, your dumbass grandchild let your grandgrandson watch a Warner movie and it's fucking over for you. Just like that.

You should read Nietzsche's On the Geneology of Morals if you haven't done so already, and from there, realize when you are being taught a subverted, delusional, and weaker form of morality. Realize Judeo-Christian morality is at the core of these delusional lies, and the "high priests" in power who propagate these lies don't live by them in the slightest. You think that Hollywood film actors really believe in "true love" and "overlooking flaws"?

 

[NorthernWind]

How "True love" and Judeo-Christian morality are connected?

 

[NapoliPizzaPie]

How "True love" and Judeo-Christian morality are connected?

Judeo-Christian moral valuation can lead to a delusional view of "true love." In the former, "non-lustful" "love" is viewed as "evil, Pagan, satanic," as one of the highest "moral" things you can do in such a tradition is to redirect your "eros" ("romantic desire") towards God - complete subordination of the flesh to something "spiritually higher." And ultimately, that is at the heart of the lie known as "true love" which perpetuates itself into our society. It's really just a secular form, with "God" replaced by "the person for who they are." You redirect your "eros" towards loving someone for the "person they are" or their "personality" or their "heart", anything but raw, physical attraction.

In Catholicism specifically, some Catholic Saint nuns had "spiritually ecstatic" experiences which often had subtle sexual, orgasmic overtones; Saint Catherine Laboure, for example, Jesus ripped her heart out replaced it with His Heart, and she had to "bleed out" the pain out of love for Jesus, all the while she felt Jesus's love towards her.

Saint Teresa of Avila had an angel pierce her heart, and when the angel removed the spear, her entire body was caught on fire, pulsating with love, as she began to moan; she described it as painful, but as God caressing her with love.

This particular example has a famous depiction in Italy, and it's sexually suggestive with an angel on top of her while she moans in a position of reception. The angel looks as though he's almost grabbing her breast.

This is Catholicism specifically, but it exists in other Christian traditions like Eastern Orthodoxy and Oriental Orthodoxy (read Saint John Chrysostom, he says the same stuff), Islam (Sufism), and Judaism (Kabaalism)

It's connected because all of this stuff is a delusional lie. There is no "true love," "love" comes from your biological imperative to reproduce. The psychological release of chemicals that are satisfied when you successfully fuck someone of the opposite gender. That is what "love" is. And that eventually dies when your libido dies, or you get enough of it; which is why you see so much older, miserable couples, or sexually successful men who don't feel "love." It's why people who have more sexual partners are more likely to cheat; their "pair-bonding" (read: "love") ability goes down, because their psychological needs are satisfied.

Even these spiritual "experiences" demonstrate this. Women are orgasming while feeling pain for Jesus (a kink many women notoriously have; they love rough, violent sex). Quite literally. Why? Because "love" has origins in your biological imperative to reproduce. It has nothing to do with "God giving it to you" or some "external source of grace coming into you." It doesn't come from "falling in love with someone's personality" or "loving them for who they are." It comes from you wanting to fuck someone. The fact that one has to redirect "their eros" towards God shows that love doesn't come from God or from "loving others," it comes from their eros.

Let me ask you a question:
Who is actually happier? Those who are able to fuck or those who don't fuck out of some weak justification of "Oh God's love is greater than sex" or "oh I'm asexual" or "oh I'm waiting for kids"

A man who marries a deformed or burned up woman out of some "charity" will never, never be romantically attracted to them. They may like them as a close friend that they can be intimate with, but they will never love them like they would a beautiful, intelligent woman.

 

[NorthernWind]

Judeo-Christian moral valuation can lead to a delusional view of "true love." In the former, "non-lustful" "love" is viewed as "evil, Pagan, satanic," as one of the highest "moral" things you can do in such a tradition is to redirect your "eros" ("romantic desire") towards God - complete subordination of the flesh to something "spiritually higher." And ultimately, that is at the heart of the lie known as "true love" which perpetuates itself into our society. It's really just a secular form, with "God" replaced by "the person for who they are." You redirect your "eros" towards loving someone for the "person they are" or their "personality" or their "heart", anything but raw, physical attraction.

In Catholicism specifically, some Catholic Saint nuns had "spiritually ecstatic" experiences which often had subtle sexual, orgasmic overtones; Saint Catherine Laboure, for example, Jesus ripped her heart out replaced it with His Heart, and she had to "bleed out" the pain out of love for Jesus, all the while she felt Jesus's love towards her.

Saint Teresa of Avila had an angel pierce her heart, and when the angel removed the spear, her entire body was caught on fire, pulsating with love, as she began to moan; she described it as painful, but as God caressing her with love.

This particular example has a famous depiction in Italy, and it's sexually suggestive with an angel on top of her while she moans in a position of reception. The angel looks as though he's almost grabbing her breast.

This is Catholicism specifically, but it exists in other Christian traditions like Eastern Orthodoxy and Oriental Orthodoxy (read Saint John Chrysostom, he says the same stuff), Islam (Sufism), and Judaism (Kabaalism)

It's connected because all of this stuff is a delusional lie. There is no "true love," "love" comes from your biological imperative to reproduce. The psychological release of chemicals that are satisfied when you successfully fuck someone of the opposite gender. That is what "love" is. And that eventually dies when your libido dies, or you get enough of it; which is why you see so much older, miserable couples, or sexually successful men who don't feel "love." It's why people who have more sexual partners are more likely to cheat; their "pair-bonding" (read: "love") ability goes down, because their psychological needs are satisfied.

Even these spiritual "experiences" demonstrate this. Women are orgasming while feeling pain for Jesus (a kink many women notoriously have; they love rough, violent sex). Quite literally. Why? Because "love" has origins in your biological imperative to reproduce. It has nothing to do with "God giving it to you" or some "external source of grace coming into you." It doesn't come from "falling in love with someone's personality" or "loving them for who they are." It comes from you wanting to fuck someone. The fact that one has to redirect "their eros" towards God shows that love doesn't come from God or from "loving others," it comes from their eros.

Let me ask you a question:
Who is actually happier? Those who are able to fuck or those who don't fuck out of some weak justification of "Oh God's love is greater than sex" or "oh I'm asexual" or "oh I'm waiting for kids"

A man who marries a deformed or burned up woman out of some "charity" will never, never be romantically attracted to them. They may like them as a close friend that they can be intimate with, but they will never love them like they would a beautiful, intelligent woman.

I mostly agree with you. However, beautiful love stories( call it true, romantic love ) are found in different cultures ( including non-Christian ones ). Majority of them are about love between young man and a young woman. A beautiful man, and a beautiful woman. These stories are often tragic and they are non-Christian by nature because they are not about "happy marriage", "salvation" or "happy ending". There are no love stories between a deformed persons or lgbt stuff ( PC media can promote "love" stories between such persons, but no one believes in that crap; they're fake ).
Romantic love is not about "loving someone for who they are" or "loving someone as an image of God", of course. Looks are very important component in romantic love, however love is greater than simply lust/sexual attraction. Its completely devoures someone. I have even read Christian saints saying that hate is better than [romantic] love because the latter completely kills desire to live. So, romantic love and desire to live Christian lifestyle are incompatible by nature.

 

[NapoliPizzaPie]

I mostly agree with you. However, beautiful love stories( call it true, romantic love ) are found in different cultures ( including non-Christian ones ). Majority of them are about love between young man and a young woman. A beautiful man, and a beautiful woman. These stories are often tragic and they are non-Christian by nature because they are not about "happy marriage", "salvation" or "happy ending". There are no love stories between a deformed persons or lgbt stuff ( PC media can promote "love" stories between such persons, but no one believes in that crap; they're fake ).

I agree completely. Shallow Hal is a bullshit fairytale. Not to mention that I wouldn't fuck Gwyneth Paltrow with her dead-inside Sid the Sloth eyes.

Romantic love is not about "loving someone for who they are" or "loving someone as an image of God", of course. Looks are very important component in romantic love, however love is greater than simply lust/sexual attraction. Its completely devoures someone. I have even read Christian saints saying that hate is better than [romantic] love because the latter completely kills desire to live. So, romantic love and desire to live Christian lifestyle are incompatible by nature.

True, true; but I would say that "devouring love" comes from inexperience with romantic relations, because your emotional needs aren't filled yet. My brother for example has a body count of 12, and the only time he got psychologically hurt was from like the first two girls he dated, the second one scarred him because she was an abusive cunt and he was immature. The next 10 hasn't even bothered him, and while some were ONS's, some were actual dating.

My dad was similar; my dad dated like 4 girls, and the first 2 he was really attached two. He didn't really feel much to the next one, but he claims he feels it to my mom (even though he confided with me indirectly that he settled for her; he was a Chadlite and my mom was below average, but he felt that she would never cheat on him - and she never did).

 

[Deleted member 29033]

nobody on this website believes in any of the shit you just said

Based moment.

 

[NapoliPizzaPie]

Based moment.

 

[Deleted member 33893]

After all, "why not get an escort" or a "prostitute" then?

Because paying 200€+ per intercourse is both pathetic and something I could not afford to keep up with if I tried to satisfy my sex drive. I want sex 3-4 times a week. That's 12-16 payments of 200€+ or 2400€-3200€ .

Love probably exists. I think women can love a chad to death. I think losing a chad pushes women into sucide and self harm.

 

[Mulattocel]

nobody on this website believes in any of the shit you just said

 

[NorthernWind]

Because paying 200€+ per intercourse is both pathetic and something I could not afford to keep up with if I tried to satisfy my sex drive. I want sex 3-4 times a week. That's 12-16 payments of 200€+ or 2400€-3200€ .

Love probably exists. I think women can love a chad to death. I think losing a chad pushes women into sucide and self harm.

They can still settle with some beta cuck who will provide for them ( a 'good man' ), but their heart will never belong to him. They of course can deceive themselves ( as women always do ) but they will only tolerate his presense ( at best ) or mock and humilate him ( in a subtle way so he and his surrounding wouldn't be able to grasp that ).

 

[TheReaper]

I agree but your efforts to sound smart are really annoying

 

[NapoliPizzaPie]

I agree but your efforts to sound smart are really annoying

autism pill