Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

LifeFuel The "blackpill psychology" initiative

Fontaine

Fontaine

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Posts
5,417
Psychology and psychotherapy are not going away.

Why not draw these fields closer to evolutionary psychology and the truth of lookism, impact of looks on confidence and self-esteem, etc?

We already have a lot of allies in psychology faculties, such as Jordan Peterson or Steven Pinker, but evopsy is still marginalized.

If every incel who can goes to psychology faculty, to become a professional psychologist, we could then make an alliance and influence the course of psychology towards a proper understanding of phenomena driven by evolutionary history and the limbic system.
 
Jordan Peterson is not an incel ally
 
This is like those cucks that suggest right wingers move to the center to draw more support from the left. What really happens is you lose your own movement's identity while the group you tried to bring over to your side still hates you just as much. Steven Pinker and Richard Dawkins continually deny the blackpill-est conclusions of their own work. Incels can say whatever they want wherever they want, and now with the internet we have a platform vastly larger than anything we could have had in the past. Following or supporting or futilely trying to "influence" toward our ideas the modern day (((philosophers))), (((psychologists))), and (((e-celebs))) is a massive waste of time and will only gimp the progression of our own blackpill philosophy to whatever speed society thinks is acceptable. Richard Dawkins is finally dipping his toes into areas he could have commented on 40 years ago, if not for the fact that he cucks out to maintain pretenses and a high standard of living most of us incels don't have and never will have.
 
psychology faculty,
psychology is one of the most bluepilled & pseudoscientific fields of study there is.
fact's don't matter in psychology. it's already fallen completely under sjw control.
 
This is like those cucks that suggest right wingers move to the center to draw more support from the left. What really happens is you lose your own movement's identity while the group you tried to bring over to your side still hates you just as much. Steven Pinker and Richard Dawkins continually deny the blackpill-est conclusions of their own work. Incels can say whatever they want wherever they want, and now with the internet we have a platform vastly larger than anything we could have had in the past. Following or supporting or futilely trying to "influence" toward our ideas the modern day (((philosophers))), (((psychologists))), and (((e-celebs))) is a massive waste of time
psychology is one of the most bluepilled & pseudoscientific fields of study there is.
fact's don't matter in psychology. it's already fallen completely under sjw control.
That's because blackpilled and alt-right men are uncoordinated losers, not because there's anything wrong with infiltrating a hostile environment.

The Marxists, the psychoanalysts and the atheists successfully infiltrated hostile, traditionalist Western universities between 1880 and 1930.
 
I hope you succeed in your shrink career and revolutionize the field.
 
That's because blackpilled and alt-right men are uncoordinated losers, not because there's anything wrong with infiltrating a hostile environment.

The Marxists, the psychoanalysts and the atheists successfully infiltrated hostile, traditionalist Western universities between 1880 and 1930.
Low IQ. The wealthy families that provided the grants that built those universities realized they could make more money if they could pit scholarly Marxists against the traditionalist commonfolk. These same families create wars so they can sell weapons and equipment to both sides at the same time. The naivety required to suggest that Marxists, psychoanalysts, and atheists were independently and especially coordinated in their infiltration, and not that the change developed from within, is just absurd. A festering, metastasizing sore deep inside.

The ONLY thing they had going for them was they provided the grounds for a kind of relativism that offered ideological copes. Marxism and psychoanalysis use self aggrandizing platitudes to claim the effects of genetic predisposition are outweighed by nonsense floaty nothings that become tenable for no reason other than the fact that they move the goalpost whenever someone attempts to argue with one specific definition.

By your logic, the Freikorps, as it existed after WW1, should have failed in stamping out the Spartacist Uprising and the German Revolution simply because they were made up of "uncoordinated losers" that could have stood no match against Marxist rebels, which apparently have some kind of bulletproof-ness in this example.

By and large, any "infiltration" into Western universities that occurred between 1880 and 1930 took place because their own university higher-ups had a vested interest in shaping thought in that direction, and not that the students, almost all of which were/are mindless lemmings, would actually have the ability to change the ideological backbone of the discourse themselves.
 
I'm with you brother
 
Wouldn't clinical psychology and therapy influenced by evopsych be less profitable than what we have now? Currently psychotherapy is a bunch of otherwise useless cucks and roasties smooth-talking and manipulating depressed people, it's basically an industry created out of thin air.
 

Similar threads

B
Replies
30
Views
2K
BlueCore
BlueCore
Regenerator
Replies
42
Views
2K
blackpillednigga
blackpillednigga
SandNiggerKANG
Replies
149
Views
8K
Rapistcel
Rapistcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top