You know very well what i mean by brother. It is every single man.
The Bible as an anti-moralist book – Adam and Eve, Garden of Eden, Cain and Abel in-depth analysis
If that wasn't the case, then why did Joseph run away from the pharaoh's wife? Even if he was a bad person to him?
Ah yes, the same God that gave us egos wants us to experience ego death and disassociate. You don't seem to like a lot of God's creations.
It is not that ego is something inherently wicked, but you should do the bare minimum to not feed that type of ego.
God do not tempt, and He did not create nothing that leads us to sin so we would be throw in the fire for the sake of the lolz.
On the contrary, i love God's Creation, to the point i do not want to destroy nor humiliate no one.
Truth shall set one free.
Now you, seek The Truth if you care for your soul
What about ego death and ressurrection?
High iq theory I suppose, but it has no basis in reality
Tubal-Cain is a Hebrew name.
The Septuagint translates "Meshech and Tubal" as "Mosoch and Thobel."
Tobal gave rise to the Thobelites, who are now called Iberes.
They were always identified alongside the Messiah-Moschi.
View: https://youtu.be/ljnEbW1Yi4o?si=i4kxh6-qIBpmhdbE
All i can say is to beware endless geneology if you believe this is true.
Paul warns against that.
How come
Yes, it’s genealogy which is extremely difficult to track going back that far in years. The Bible discloses a couple different versions. Pick the right one, plus using an interdisciplinary approach by using modern science (genomics) and linguistics (place names) etc….the puzzle begins to fit.
Some “fairy tales” or “myths” can turn into reality.
View: https://youtu.be/vrNxLYu5pD8?si=LVNdFed0BADYhmhg
Last edited:
6 If you point these things out to the brothers and sisters,[a] you will be a good minister of Christ Jesus, nourished on the truths of the faith and of the good teaching that you have followed. 7 Have nothing to do with godless myths and old wives’ tales; rather, train yourself to be godly. 8 For physical training is of some value, but godliness has value for all things, holding promise for both the present life and the life to come. 9 This is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance. 10 That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe.
1 Timothy
This is unironically amazing and eye opening for someone like me who is unsure of his own nature and the nature of his god. This definitely deserves at the very least some attention for how well researched and written it is. Can you link your yt channel i'd definitely give it a watch
Are you saying the government shouldn't allow non-whites and Muslims to reproduce?
It's not well researched at all btw, I just read the beginning of genesis and wrote down all of my thoughts and ended up molding it into a cohesive essay,
Damn well i'll be on the lookout for your content thenIt's not well researched at all btw, I just read the beginning of genesis and wrote down all of my thoughts and ended up molding it into a cohesive essay,
video about it deffo wont come out in a while since it's sunny here and I'm only "productive" when the weather sucks.
I mostly make naruto videos + whatever else i think i have a unique perspective on.
I don't think they should be in western countries in the first place.
And I am certainly not for the growth of their population in their own countries either.
Should they be allowed to reproduce at all?
If they are islamic then personally I would say no.
But for the general population, it doesn't really bother me, but I am not anti reproduction.
How do you think they should be stopped from reproducing? Abortion?
Not abortion, I don't think there is any practical way to stop them, other than harsh penalties if they bare children.
naturalistic fallacy stuff pulled right out of your butt. no church fathers and theologians admited such heresies. you just made your own cult basically... .
Yes I did lil nigga. Idc about the church fathers I have my own brain.
apparently not. more mental leaps than assasins creed faith leaps... .
It's called an interpretation. It's an allegorical book. If you think it's literal I have a bridge to sell you.
religion is cope
T
My god, christcucks suck at everything, even defending their own theology.
From a societal perspective, you are basically setting fuel to hypergamy, since one woman in your household means less woman for a truecel to find and mate with. Not to mention the fact it breeds unstable households, constant rivalries in your family, some might even lead to degenerate bisexual shit. All that will fuck up a child, he will be confused about the dynamic of what a parent should look like, leaving him lost. Children are the future of a society and the way they are raised highly influences the future of that nation/society. Polygamy is basically a recipe for societal chaos.
FYI, I am not taking sides or anything. I just wanted to clear out the distinction since these niggas can't even speak or clear things out without sounding like brainwashed goyim, speaking in all that gibberish as if it will make things much more easier for non-believers and those that aren't used to theology.
What you are describing isn't lust, it's sexual attraction. These are 2 different things. The true definition of lust is when you desire to fuck anything that isn't your other half. Infact if we look at lust, it's actually devastating from a personal and societal way. Personally, if you fuck more than you should have, you are left with more burdens on your shoulder, thus rendering your free will. You will constantly have to look out for 100 kids because you decided to fuck the entire town.
From a societal perspective, you are basically setting fuel to hypergamy, since one woman in your household means less woman for a truecel to find and mate with. Not to mention the fact it breeds unstable households, constant rivalries in your family, some might even lead to degenerate bisexual shit. All that will fuck up a child, he will be confused about the dynamic of what a parent should look like, leaving him lost. Children are the future of a society and the way they are raised highly influences the future of that nation/society. Polygamy is basically a recipe for societal chaos.
FYI, I am not taking sides or anything. I just wanted to clear out the distinction since these niggas can't even speak or clear things out without sounding like brainwashed goyim, speaking in all that gibberish as if it will make things much more easier for non-believers and those that aren't used to theology.
Last edited:
No one has an "other half". Marriage is a social construct. The feeling of sexual attraction towards your neighbor is no different from the feeling of sexual attraction towards your wife.
Who cares about "truecels", I am talking about human nature. Polygamy is what humans seem to gravitate towards. Monogamy works only through force.
Humans need their ass kicking no 3 paragraphs will stop that. No more sex and people suffering more mentally is music into my ears, it’ll force evolution into their dna
I am explaining to you the distinction and why it's frowned upon, even from a secular perspective.
Maybe so, but even then it still doesn't invalidate the reason why people should be against lust.
Nature, or at least intinct, is a chaotic mess, it's basically like an unthinking algorithm, it does what its genetic code prescribes it to do, whether it's for the survival of the organism or not. Just because something is natural or instinctual to an organism, it doesn't mean it is always beneficial for this specific organism. That's where natural selection comes into place, it removes organisms with instincts that do not meet the requirements for survival and wellbeing. If you see a car and your immediate instinct is to jump infront of it rather than avoiding it, it was natural for you to do it, but it was also bad for you since you are practically dead. That's natural selection for you.
Nature has no concepts of monogamy or polygamy, the brain does what it was coded to do, if it sees boobs and vagina, it sends signals to the body. That's it.
It wasn't an argument for truecels, it was for why polygamy would lead to societal collapse.
Last edited:
As for this, I meant it figuratively, not as if it's a biological or an ontological reality.
I guess I just disagree. I think instinct can only be rendered bad within society. And if that's the case why disavow instinct (something which will always linger) and not society itself. Clearly we weren't built to live inside it.
Healthy humans wont go from thriving in one generation to jumping in front of cars in the next generation. That very natural selection makes it so only people with an adequately adapted instinct even get to roam the earth. Instinct won't tell you to jump in front of a car because if your ancestors had that same instinct, they would've died off and never passed down their retardation.
Problem is nowadays inferiors are sheltered and kept alive, just unhealthy enough not to grow independent from the "system" and just healthy enough to wageslave, giving birth to other inferiors, and with more inferiors hypergamy increases too. Whether lust is systemically punished or not, it will always be there, and people will always gravitate towards practicing it. But with those social restrictions which you believe help us, come other social constructs like human rights which allow inferiors to breed, only boosting hypergamy in turn making the situation even worse.
Last edited:
personally i find the book of Job really anti-moralist. it basically tells you it's meaningless to be good or be faithful. it tells you to worship power and knowledge.
the most amusing part is that gawd tells the 3 friends of Job to STFU. the 3 friends stand for believers, saying BS like "gawd is testing you", "gawd works in mysterious ways", "just trust gawd, who are you to question gawd?"
the most amusing part is that gawd tells the 3 friends of Job to STFU. the 3 friends stand for believers, saying BS like "gawd is testing you", "gawd works in mysterious ways", "just trust gawd, who are you to question gawd?"
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
