D
The base of it is assuming women are more fragile/gullible/mentally weaker and therefore can't be fully held accountable for their actions, but at the same time, that they still deserve freedom, large amounts of licentiousness, the possibility of holding positions of authority, etc.
Think about it; let's use the typical annoying agecuck as a first example:
A man who thinks women under a certain age should not fuck AT ALL, with anyone, and should be punished if she did, might be unreasonable (since we know women are already more than fertile and ready to get fucked earlier than ever nowadays and that women's brains never reach a point in which they can be trusted for good mate selection, so this is irrelevant), but I wouldn't say he's an agecuck. What makes someone an agecuck is simultaneously thinking foids under some arbitrary age are a no-go for men who are above another arbitrary age (category that often includes himself, enhancing the cuckold aspect of it; "I'll mount guard so that older men like me don't bother you while you fuck younger dudes, m'lady"), but it's ok for men who are under a certain age to ravish their holes freely.
Someone who thinks women are more fragile/gullible/mentally weaker and thus can't be fully held accountable for their actions, but stays consistent with this view and concludes that they can't enjoy freedom, licentiousness and let alone positions of power either, is also not a cuck/simp/etc. The cuck/simp/etc is the one who'll treat women as poor gullible children to let them off the hook whenever they mess up, but will at the same time support them having freedom and all the other points mentioned above.
They will talk about power disparity of an older man being able to manipulate an younger girl, but why is that a bad thing? Society was better off when men had power over women. I believe it's highly preferable for older men to marry younger girls as it would guarantee a more patriarchal dynamic. Agecuckery is just part of the feminist movement, increasing the age of consent was just as important to them as gaining the right to vote, because they know by forbidding men from marrying younger easier to control women, it will decrease their overall quality of life and make the society more feminist over time.
The most common scenario nowadays for both men and women is trying to be a textbook feminist and that men and women should have exactly the same rights and amount of responsibility, but when shit hits the fan, women will enjoy tons of privileges and women will get treated much better by these people when they mess up because of gynocentrism.
Think about it; let's use the typical annoying agecuck as a first example:
A man who thinks women under a certain age should not fuck AT ALL, with anyone, and should be punished if she did, might be unreasonable (since we know women are already more than fertile and ready to get fucked earlier than ever nowadays and that women's brains never reach a point in which they can be trusted for good mate selection, so this is irrelevant), but I wouldn't say he's an agecuck. What makes someone an agecuck is simultaneously thinking foids under some arbitrary age are a no-go for men who are above another arbitrary age (category that often includes himself, enhancing the cuckold aspect of it; "I'll mount guard so that older men like me don't bother you while you fuck younger dudes, m'lady"), but it's ok for men who are under a certain age to ravish their holes freely.
Someone who thinks women are more fragile/gullible/mentally weaker and thus can't be fully held accountable for their actions, but stays consistent with this view and concludes that they can't enjoy freedom, licentiousness and let alone positions of power either, is also not a cuck/simp/etc. The cuck/simp/etc is the one who'll treat women as poor gullible children to let them off the hook whenever they mess up, but will at the same time support them having freedom and all the other points mentioned above.
They will talk about power disparity of an older man being able to manipulate an younger girl, but why is that a bad thing? Society was better off when men had power over women. I believe it's highly preferable for older men to marry younger girls as it would guarantee a more patriarchal dynamic. Agecuckery is just part of the feminist movement, increasing the age of consent was just as important to them as gaining the right to vote, because they know by forbidding men from marrying younger easier to control women, it will decrease their overall quality of life and make the society more feminist over time.
The most common scenario nowadays for both men and women is trying to be a textbook feminist and that men and women should have exactly the same rights and amount of responsibility, but when shit hits the fan, women will enjoy tons of privileges and women will get treated much better by these people when they mess up because of gynocentrism.
