Your entire line of argumentation is loaded with strawman arguments
1. What is your criteria for the choice not being "blind"?
When you decide to eat one of your favorite foods (lets say pizza), did you just "blindly give in to your hunger and appetite"?
Or did you choose to eat pizza that day because you were passing by a pizza place, thought about what else you'd like to eat, and decided to go with the pizza because "I'm already here" and "pizza tastes good"
Nobody just blindly decides this, we all have our preferences and tastes, you are using personal standards of "extra criteria" one should be looking for before they should decide to have sex, and those criteria are based on emotional subjective garbage that you believe, and refuse to let go of and accept reality
"She needs to "love" me for me
"
I'm sorry, its time to stop being a child and grow up, that's not reality, all the romantic bullshit you are obsessed with isn't real
2. When you say "give in" you are implying that its something that should be resisted, and like I said in point 1 above, the criteria for why one should resist is obviously emotional and subjective garbage, as there is no logical reason to sexually starve yourself, it all comes down to emotions or some subjective reasoning
3. Who decided that the person you are having sex with should "matter to you"?
I don't know why incels go around with this delusion that "sex is sacred", its only like that to you because you have no real life experience and you haven't had sex yet
Nobody who has an active sex life thinks sex is sacred, its always the people who aren't having sex that pretend (
yes pretend) its sacred. Deep down you it isn't
If you are comparing a man having sex with many women, to a woman having sex with many men, then you are ironically just proving my point that you are adhering to a feminized standard of masculinity,
BECAUSE YOU ARE BASICALLY SAYING MEN AND WOMEN ARE EQUAL
Men and women are not the same and were not traditionally judged by the same standards
You comparing a man's sexual escapades to a woman whoring around is ironically part of feminist "slut culture"
It requires no effort or resources for a woman to have sex with many men, for a man to have sex with many women he had to create value, very few men are born with enough inherent value (looks) to be able to fuck around like a woman (
the exception to the rule)
Once again, the exception has no place in an argument, the exception to the rule does not disprove the rule, I only brought up this exception because I know one of you idiots would respond with "but Chad does X"
A man has to provide value to a woman in order to have sex with her, a woman just needs to exist, these two scenarios don't even come close