Image not related
Radvinsky is dead. The legacy he left was the UK's most valuable social media company: OnlyFans.
At its core, OnlyFans is a business built upon the exploitation of low-SMV men. Pornography is not new; a generation of teenagers had access to porn (for free), and their forefathers before them had nudie mags. But OnlyFans was the very first to recognise that they could charge hefty premiums by selling to the loneliest of their customers an artificial and hollow imitation of "companionship," or what they described as the "creator-fan interaction". In exchange for tips and gifts, the Stacy "creator" would very briefly acknowledge the existence of the simp "fan"—a self-imposed regressive tax where revenue flows from the genetically deprived to the genetically gifted.
In the ensuing years, "creators" have outsourced much of the "interaction" to "chatters". It is absurd to spend $50 in tips to have a 15-minute text conversation with a blonde Stacy, but when you're talking to a brownoid earning $2/hr in a Manila call centre? Inexplicable. Alas, the Grim Reaper of enshittification has taken its toll, and even simping isn't immune.
All this makes for an extraordinarily lucrative business for the Stacy. For every $50 that is redistributed from the simp, $10 goes to OnlyFans. An agent takes another $10, who subcontracts the grunt work of "chatting" to Filipinas and Indians. The Stacy merely exists and walks home with the lion's share. The simp, of course, bears quite a bit of blame for willingly contracting to this arrangement, but we musn't forget the culture of misandry and the ever-present message of male disposability that has left the lonely simp in such dire straits. In that sense, Radvinsky is to simps the way that the Sackler family is to opioid addicts: A despicable predator.
That said, Radvinsky's work did unintentionally provide a brutal blackpill. That is, he challenged the 2nd-wave feminist lie that femoids are forced into pornography. OnlyFans proved that many femoids voluntarily prostitute themselves despite having no barriers to education, and having rights and privileges equal to or greater than most men.
It's simple, really. Flaunting your body is significantly more lucrative than any traditionally "girlboss" career, if only for the reason that you reach your peak earning years early in your career. Consider law: Last Friday, Goldman Sachs disclosed that outgoing general counsel (GC) and former Epstein confidante Kathy Ruemmler was paid $25 million last year—which places her amongst the best-paid GCs in the Fortune 500—but most GCs, herself included, are in their 50s. And even then, $25M is still significantly below what the highest-earning OnlyFans whores earn. You can grind your way to the very top and even network with "Uncle Jeffrey's" circle, you'll still be outearned by someone half your age who simply fucks on camera.
This was something I realized some years ago when I first came to terms with my SMV and decided to start escortcelling—one look at the pricing at any mid-high or high-end agency, and you'll realize Beckys and Stacies have incomes comparable to junior and mid-level investment bankers respectively, even after taking into account the agency's cut. If you are an Eastern European femoid you can simply travel around London, Monaco, Amsterdam, Dubai (not now I suppose) every so often, and Davos (for one week in January) on tourist visas and rake in cash, which you probably won't declare to customs anyway. And you don't even need an Ivy League or Oxbridge pedigree to do it. If you are a Western European femoid or one from a native-English-speaking country, you can earn even more as an independent escort or with an exclusive arrangement with a particularly well-off client.
I'd look at these price lists, and then the next day I'd hear someone—say, an acquaintance of an acquaintance—unironically describe "prostitutes" as "oppressed victims of the patriarchy". And I'd be wondering whether we're living in the same universe because there is nothing inherently oppressive about making a conscious choice to receive €1000+ (or your currency equivalent) an hour to suck a cock instead of the myriad of other options in a capitalist society. I'm sure it's revolting for a Stacy to have to touch a sub8, but surely her job isn't worse than the prison officer who has feces hurled at him by an inmate, or the railway worker who has to pick up the sub8's body parts after a suicide by train—both jobs overwhelmingly filled by men who do not earn very much. But I'd keep my mouth shut so as to not reveal my power level. It was peak woke.
So if there is any shred of positivity in the sordid legacy that Radvinsky left behind, it is this: He has blackpilled a generation of men by comprehensively defeating the feminist gaslight that femoids flaunt or sell their bodies due to "oppression". For a significant number of femoids, gaining attention and resources from men is not just a skill—it is their most valuable skill and an amazingly profitable one at that.
OnlyFans is the natural endpoint of a culture that tells low-SMV men their only worth as a human is what they can materially contribute to their genetic superiors. The one silver lining is that the visibility of femoid privilege has so permeated the public consciousness that it is no longer possible for any young man to reasonably believe that the life of a femoid, especially a high-SMV one at that, is inherently "harder" and less desirable than the male experience.
Last edited:
, no one forced anyone to participate. No sympathy for those simps. Most of them were married boomers anyway, young people aren't stupid enough to buy pornography.
