Coping with the idea of love being feasible only through fiction, and idolising certain characters that exactly marketed to target the male loneliness epidemic is now bluepilled?
Accepting that you are completely unloveable, and latching onto the kind of characters that present themselves in the exact archetype that seems utterly void in real-world society is now bluepilled?
Are you completely throwing out the terminology behind Blackpill just to fit your own argument against it? In which way does this disregard the pre-deterministic nature of reality, to the point where you can't draw only derive pleasure from fictional characters that cannot exist and are franchises where your own version of such a character wouldn't be able to hold the constraints of biology.
Most sewer users (and users in general) with an anime avi do not cosplay or roleplay as though they are the character themselves, they make it explicitly clear that they only see the character as their "waifu", and even actively lash out at others who go a bit too far in their interest of them.
To pretend that it is a constant phenomenon for users to act out cuteness in efforts to appear as though they are that character is to blatantly ignore the vast majority of instances where there is a clear disconnect between the avi and the rest of how the user portrays themselves, with many would be seen as 'edgy' to the average person, with the avi only being there to show appreciation of the character.
To convey it is on the extent of loli and pedophilia argument is to ignore the complete differences between the arguments: the issue of loli media is that it actively depicts children as nsfw, with the features of the character deliberately displaying the features of which would be read as a stylised version of real-world children; there is no discussion on whether it constitutes as a replacement for pedophilia, it's that it actively encourages people to find attraction in the features of which the stylised version draws from on in the media.
For anime vs real avis discussion, you aren't arguing on whether it builds sexual interest in the irl equivalent, as we are heterosexual and it's not as though your inceldom completely deprived majority of users of their sexual urges so this shouldn't matter and the argument on pedophilia and lolis being similar falls completely short, it's whether or not it constitutes as 'woman worship' i.e you are painting women as innocent angels who can do no harm; yet this wouldn't fall under that umbrella as it is the active acceptance that you CAN'T find a woman in the real world who would appear any way similar to this so you cope with a fictional one even if we all know it isn't real.
You aren't painting any woman as 'angels' as the character of which you orbit isn't actually real in any way. There is no reinforcement of real female social leverage, no validation of women stance in the hierarchy, no subordinating or white-knighting your own agency over to any real person.
You completely isolate desire of a woman itself (aka heterosexuality) from the chains of which normally hold you back from fully acknowledging blackpill. It is fine to 'desire' love, and Blackpill doesn't require you to completely lose that aspect. It's that you have to accept predetermined aspects of yourself, society and biology itself holds you back from ever receiving it.
If anything, the stance of arguing that being fully Blackpilled means you can't desire woman in any capacity is just completely contradicting the core nature of it.
To be clear, I’m emphasizing this because libido and attraction are deterministic as well.
Your attraction circuitry will never 'switch off' just due to ideological adoption, as Libido is biologically wired as well as your sexual attraction, your heterosexual desire is also deterministic.
You can never truly escape this predetermined reality, you can only smother it down at best; those into anime use the medium to best escape the constraints on this relying on real women and real world relationships as an alternative, that's all.
Your definition of worship is so broad that it includes baseline heterosexuality: heterosexual attraction is normal, fantasising is normal, consuming media on such thing is normal. Even to some extents appreciation of visual aesthetics is what we are designed to do as pattern driven creatures.
What's not normal is going beyond that and painting those you are attracted to as inherently untouchable, or in some way superior.
