Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The age of consent will be lowered one way or the other

N

Nihilcel

Greycel
Joined
Mar 25, 2022
Posts
16
The Soviet Union had the perfect system: an individually-tailored age of consent based on personal development. Someone could legally consent from age 12, provided they were deemed mature enough and met certain physiological and psychological goalposts. Conversely, someone who was considered developmentally stunted could not do so regardless of age.

This is too individualistic for the "individualist West", where an arbitrary and increasing AOC prevails. But the ensuing social collapse should resolve this issu3: A fifteen-year-old's womb is going to be prime real estate in a society where death rates are massively up and we return to the sorts of dynamics that dominated most of human civilization. Because, for hundreds of thousands of years, teenagers were understood to be young adults. The awful Americanized infantilization of the teenager is a product of capitalist interest (teenagers push their parents to consume mindlessly) and Christianity (the child as the embodiment of a prelapsarian innocence that doesn't actually exist). Disney and deity have equally contributed to the idiotic state of affairs in America, and there will be a massive course correction imposed by reality in the not terribly distant future.

Give legit (prepubescent-attracted) pedophiles sex robots and hentai and individualize that age of consent.
 
Last edited:
Another thing: in the Cold War period, homosexuality was used as a tool to blackmail people in socially desirable positions. You can't do that anymore - it backfires.

The glowies (who doubtless read these posts) are missing an opportunity here. By coming down massively and indiscriminately on all cases of underage sex, you're losing the social leverage this gives you by allowing but shunning it (I'm not talking about someone pulling an Ian Watkins and raping a toddler, but rather someone banging a fifteen year old). If it's completely illegal, you don't have the opportunity to use it against people. There's an ironclad realpolitik case for legally allowing these sexual relationships while still shunning them.

I get that a hebephile will always be subject to social scorn (as long as something like modernity exists). But you might as well pathologize it into a mental disorder.
 
Last edited:
15 should be it freshman college girls look like middle school undeveloped girls
 
You're on par to be the greatest incels.is user of all time :feelsdevil:
 
15 should be it freshman college girls look like middle school undeveloped girls
While 15-16 year olds probably shouldn't be having sex with 30 year olds, I do think they should at least be able to make an OF and we'd all be happy
 
While 15-16 year olds probably shouldn't be having sex with 30 year olds, I do think they should at least be able to make an OF and we'd all be happy

Is anything harmed by it, where there is no social coercion (i.e. using status or power) involved?
 
While 15-16 year olds probably shouldn't be having sex with 30 year olds, I do think they should at least be able to make an OF and we'd all be happy
Nah 30 year olds deserve high school girls
 
The Soviet Union had the perfect system: an individually-tailored age of consent based on personal development. Someone could legally consent from age 12, provided they were deemed mature enough and met certain physiological and psychological goalposts. Conversely, someone who was considered developmentally stunted could not do so regardless of age.

This is too individualistic for the "individualist West", where an arbitrary and increasing AOC prevails. But the ensuing social collapse should resolve this issu3: A fifteen-year-old's womb is going to be prime real estate in a society where death rates are massively up and we return to the sorts of dynamics that dominated most of human civilization. Because, for hundreds of thousands of years, teenagers were understood to be young adults. The awful Americanized infantilization of the teenager is a product of capitalist interest (teenagers push their parents to consume mindlessly) and Christianity (the child as the embodiment of a prelapsarian innocence that doesn't actually exist). Disney and deity have equally contributed to the idiotic state of affairs in America, and there will be a massive course correction imposed by reality in the not terribly distant future.

Give legit (prepubescent-attracted) pedophiles sex robots and hentai and individualize that age of consent.
It's also a part of population control. Statistically, older man/younger woman couples have the most children. If it were normalized to pair a 25-35 year old man with a 15 year old girl, you would see the birth rates dramatically increase. Instead, 15 year old girls are taught to have sterile, casual sex with many 15 year old boys and if she does become pregnant, get an abortion. And men are taught to go for "age appropriate" women because it is the "moral" and "right" thing to do.
 
While 15-16 year olds probably shouldn't be having sex with 30 year olds, I do think they should at least be able to make an OF and we'd all be happy
If you support foids making lots of money from onlyfans from just taking pics but also being against a 15-16 year old foid merely having sex with a 30 year old man, you are a feminist cuck
 
Another thing: in the Cold War period, homosexuality was used as a tool to blackmail people in socially desirable positions. You can't do that anymore - it backfires.

The glowies (who doubtless read these posts) are missing an opportunity here. By coming down massively and indiscriminately on all cases of underage sex, you're losing the social leverage this gives you by allowing but shunning it (I'm not talking about someone pulling an Ian Watkins and raping a toddler, but rather someone banging a fifteen year old). If it's completely illegal, you don't have the opportunity to use it against people. There's an ironclad realpolitik case for legally allowing these sexual relationships while still shunning them.

I get that a hebephile will always be subject to social scorn (as long as something like modernity exists). But you might as well pathologize it into a mental disorder.
It shows you how far society has fallen. You can't blackmail someone for being involved in homosexuality because homosexuality is socially acceptable and the person doing the blackmail will be seen as homophobic and a bigot for thinking homosexuality is something bad. Say a politician likes to dress up like a woman and pay down low BBC Tyrones to fuck him up the ass. You can't blackmail him with that because homosexuality is seen as something positive and progressive.

On the other hand, you could blackmail a man if it is found out that he had sex with a 17 year old girl. Look at the uproar when it was found out that Matt Gaetz had sex with a 17 year old foid. Imagine a politician in his 30s or older found having sex with a fit 17 year old gym Stacy?

Normal male heterosexuality is something to be ashamed of in this clown world while getting your butthole drilled by down low Tyrone while you're dressed up as a woman is something to be proud of and celebrated.
 
But the ensuing social collapse should resolve this issu3
there will be a massive course correction imposed by reality in the not terribly distant future
based high iq post by a grey except for these two parts which i dont agree with. curious what you think of this?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top