Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based The Aestheticization of Evil

SlayerSlayer

SlayerSlayer

The Satoru Iwata of incels.is
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Posts
25,456
Online time
1d 2h
I think we are at an inflection point in humanity where in the next epoch we will bear witness to the most fundamentally ruthless humanity has ever been since Leopold II in Congo, or Imperial Japan in Nanking, and it's all because evil for the sake of being evil is simply cool and powerful and aspirational as a mimetic concept: as long as I cause the most suffering to the largest number of people, I am actually the most powerful. I see a future with slaves and whips, crucifixion, torture, and cannibalizing children as entertainment.

This is kool kids klub thinking, I'm not the only person thinking this: everyone powerful right now, I mean, actually powerful, is drinking and living, and loving, and laughing this kool aid. There is now such a strong correlation between being downright evil and being powerful, cool, respected, and rich. It's the worst time to be a good person-- simply because it's lame and unfashionable. It's like wearing tight pants when baggy pants are in. And I don't think evil as an aesthetic will be a fad simply because unlike most fads, causing harm to others only makes people downstream of your evil, want to be abusive themselves. It's hard to shake off the desire to inflict pain upon others when it makes you feel good.

But we live in times where evil people are respected in the same way in the romantic era Chopin and Lizst were respected for being piano virtuosos-- society will respect profoundly evil 'virtuosos'-- people infamous for the sake of being prolifically harmful to others. We respect evil as an artform, and it doesn't matter if it's just murder, or a crypto scam, or sex trafficking. We remember evil and covet it's power, because there's never been a more pressing time where evil is an absolute NECESSITY for attention in an ECONOMY where only attention matters.
 
Last edited:
We’re literally watching the moral collapse of humanity.
 
tbh I've never really felt good from hurting others, I often get really sympathetic after doing stuff like that; I remember when I was a kid I cried after griefing someones minecraft base in a server.

but maybe thats a contributing factor to why i'm an incel
 
yeah but what type of evil is being promoted? no one ever goes after women or supports grape. besides the muslims
 
tbh I've never really felt good from hurting others, I often get really sympathetic after doing stuff like that; I remember when I was a kid I cried after griefing someones minecraft base in a server.

but maybe thats a contributing factor to why i'm an incel
Same.
 
yeah but what type of evil is being promoted? no one ever goes after women or supports grape. besides the muslims
anything needlessly harmful to others for the sake of empowering the perpetrator of evil
 
as long as I cause the most suffering to the largest number of people, I am actually the most powerful.
This has always been the case with power through all of time. It's the only way to be certain of your power. Making sure that another man suffers is the only way to ensure that you have power and control over that person—otherwise, how can you be certain that he is not doing what he enjoys, even if it was by your orders? Anyone who is serious about wanting control over anything should always seek out the suffering of others.
I see a future with slaves and whips, crucifixion, torture, and cannibalizing children as entertainment.
This will never happen in the way you're likely imagining it, although I do see where you're coming from. Man. generally, is simply too hedonistic to actually ever pursue evil consciously. That is, Man is too concerned in securing his own pleasure and safety, so he will never outwardly seek anything evil if it could one day happen to him, too. That's why White Knights will demonize us incels and outcast us before they say they relish in our suffering or that we deserve it. They think that they're not like us, and therefore they will never suffer the same way we do.

All of that is to say, there are some things that Man is simply incapable of ever approving of on anything other than an individual level. Cannibalizing children is one of those things.
 
We’re literally watching the moral collapse of humanity.
I disagree. If anything, Man has become too concerned with that which is 'moral,' or at least I think so.

With the Death of God, humans had to make of themselves, God. Morality then became based on what humans thought was right and wrong, and slowly the old beliefs of morality were phased out with a new 'enlightened' set. But, Nietzsche was wrong—humans can never be God. We're like children who constantly demand that which pleases us at the very moment, and our beliefs are malleable and shift spontaneously.

Humans believed themselves to be the ones who could deliver grace, forgiveness, justice, and empathy. At one point in time, perhaps, it could have been true, but not anymore. All those traits are something that must be delivered in moderation, excessive indulgence in any of them leads to decay of numerous kinds—societal, spiritual, and perhaps even physical, in a sense.

We saw what was practically the death of Britain in our lifetimes, all because those exact traits fogged up reality, and people who were supposedly 'helpless' or 'disadvantaged' suddenly filled the entire population with themselves and spat on the culture and tradition of the same people who took them in. Even worse, many of the Englishpeople simply accepted it—encouraged it, even—they believed it to be justice. Their forefathers had supposedly oppressed these same, 'helpess' people and believed themselves to be superior to them—and so the New-Age Englishpeople believe that they had to bear the sins of their ancestors.

They crafted for themselves a special kind of Hell for sins that they themselves had never committed, and that were bastardized versions of truth recorded in history.

Someone had convinced them that this was justice, and they became worried and sought to clear their conscience, lest they become unjust.

You may percieve it as a moral collapse, but it is not Man becoming bereft of morals—it is Man simply having no foundation on which to base that morality on to begin with. Or at least, that's what I think. I wish I could more eloquently articulate my thoughts on this, but I can only do so much with my IQ.
 
Man. generally, is simply too hedonistic to actually ever pursue evil consciously. That is, Man is too concerned in securing his own pleasure and safety, so he will never outwardly seek anything evil if it could one day happen to him, too.

All of that is to say, there are some things that Man is simply incapable of ever approving of on anything other than an individual level. Cannibalizing children is one of those things.
I think disagree, I think the entire point of Palantir is to secure the pleasure and safety of evil people so that they can perpetuate evil, and use that eye of sauron against any outgroups.

I think this is where dumbing down the populace comes into play, if you dumb the populace down and reward stupid and evil behavior, then it makes your own evil behavior aspirational, and that's what I think is the new trend of morality
 
I disagree. If anything, Man has become too concerned with that which is 'moral,' or at least I think so.

With the Death of God, humans had to make of themselves, God. Morality then became based on what humans thought was right and wrong, and slowly the old beliefs of morality were phased out with a new 'enlightened' set. But, Nietzsche was wrong—humans can never be God. We're like children who constantly demand that which pleases us at the very moment, and our beliefs are malleable and shift spontaneously.

Humans believed themselves to be the ones who could deliver grace, forgiveness, justice, and empathy. At one point in time, perhaps, it could have been true, but not anymore. All those traits are something that must be delivered in moderation, excessive indulgence in any of them leads to decay of numerous kinds—societal, spiritual, and perhaps even physical, in a sense.

We saw what was practically the death of Britain in our lifetimes, all because those exact traits fogged up reality, and people who were supposedly 'helpless' or 'disadvantaged' suddenly filled the entire population with themselves and spat on the culture and tradition of the same people who took them in. Even worse, many of the Englishpeople simply accepted it—encouraged it, even—they believed it to be justice. Their forefathers had supposedly oppressed these same, 'helpess' people and believed themselves to be superior to them—and so the New-Age Englishpeople believe that they had to bear the sins of their ancestors.

They crafted for themselves a special kind of Hell for sins that they themselves had never committed, and that were bastardized versions of truth recorded in history.

Someone had convinced them that this was justice, and they became worried and sought to clear their conscience, lest they become unjust.

You may percieve it as a moral collapse, but it is not Man becoming bereft of morals—it is Man simply having no foundation on which to base that morality on to begin with. Or at least, that's what I think. I wish I could more eloquently articulate my thoughts on this, but I can only do so much with my IQ.
I think people who fixate on moral policing are fundamentally uncool and powerless to begin with, and tend to be natural enemies of the people trying to commit acts of evil for their own pleasure. What you do is flood the zone, distort reality, and make it so that there are enough lies out in the ether, that it forces people to pick the side that feels most personally empowering to them-- and that tends to fall purely on ingroup/racial lines. You do everything to reward thugs and murderers so long as they harm non-elites, and disempower the haters.

I think most of what 'morality' is, is just a set of arbitrary conditions that ensure mutually beneficial good distributed among a large number of people, and this is the way most successful societies have operated, however the condition of needing other people to feel good is no longer a prerequisite to ensure the safety and survival of the elites-- especially a world where pitchforks and protests are useless against AI powered drones and cameras.
 
Last edited:
I disagree. If anything, Man has become too concerned with that which is 'moral,' or at least I think so.

With the Death of God, humans had to make of themselves, God. Morality then became based on what humans thought was right and wrong, and slowly the old beliefs of morality were phased out with a new 'enlightened' set. But, Nietzsche was wrong—humans can never be God. We're like children who constantly demand that which pleases us at the very moment, and our beliefs are malleable and shift spontaneously.

Humans believed themselves to be the ones who could deliver grace, forgiveness, justice, and empathy. At one point in time, perhaps, it could have been true, but not anymore. All those traits are something that must be delivered in moderation, excessive indulgence in any of them leads to decay of numerous kinds—societal, spiritual, and perhaps even physical, in a sense.

We saw what was practically the death of Britain in our lifetimes, all because those exact traits fogged up reality, and people who were supposedly 'helpless' or 'disadvantaged' suddenly filled the entire population with themselves and spat on the culture and tradition of the same people who took them in. Even worse, many of the Englishpeople simply accepted it—encouraged it, even—they believed it to be justice. Their forefathers had supposedly oppressed these same, 'helpess' people and believed themselves to be superior to them—and so the New-Age Englishpeople believe that they had to bear the sins of their ancestors.

They crafted for themselves a special kind of Hell for sins that they themselves had never committed, and that were bastardized versions of truth recorded in history.

Someone had convinced them that this was justice, and they became worried and sought to clear their conscience, lest they become unjust.

You may percieve it as a moral collapse, but it is not Man becoming bereft of morals—it is Man simply having no foundation on which to base that morality on to begin with. Or at least, that's what I think.
I suppose it's a case wherein they want to feel righteous, not be righteous — to engage in moral indulgence and consider it as moral depth; morality in a superficial sense still exists, but it is a flawed and distorted version of it that causes harm and is corrupt. The morality of most people is ultimately based on capricious desires, nonsensical guilt like what you mentioned, and hedonistic self-interest — not principle or any solid level of consistency and adherence to a strong moral standard that applies universally. This has been one of the reasons for the overcorrection that can be seen in Britain for the example.

Once the divine basis of it was removed, it became an idiosyncratic and highly subjective concept, prone to chaos and moral posturing. In the end, however, those people are still evil in many ways, and I have personally seen an increase in highly immoral sentiment in society, so OP is definitely correct to an extent.

I wish I could more eloquently articulate my thoughts on this, but I can only do so much with my IQ.
I think you articulate yourself very well.
 
The moon peers down on a diseased world.
There is no cure for the disease.
An entire race vaults mindlessly into destruction.
Not even a man of colossal power would be able to prevent the inevitable.
 
I think they're gonna use all this to push surveillance even further. You already cant do shit anymore without getting filmed by some cunts smartphone.
Honestly the UK in this regard is just a testing ground really, Digital Id's are going to be mandatory in every country by the end of the century bare minimum (probably earlier honestly). Censorship under the guise of banning "harmful content" to protect duh children (everybody knows the goverment dgaf about any kids lol).

Things are just gonna keep getting worse every day. Reminds me of this greentext:

1761991729410
 
thats why you have tiktokcels and instagram self proclaimed racists. Its some edgycuck materials that normies use
 
You already cant do shit anymore without getting filmed by some cunts smartphone.
normalfags and holes were not meant to have video recording capability :feelshaha: :smonk:
 
"Kill one man, and you are a murderer. Kill millions of men, and you are a conqueror. Kill them all, and you are a god."

-Jean Rostand

We really are selfish, hairless apes at the end of the day, as our closest evolutionary relative is the chimpanzee, one of the most violent and hierarchical animals on the planet. :feelsbadman:
 
Teen sexhavers get laid because they are evil at the core and can dominate and impose themselves over a woman and others, evil is the mechanism of all of society because nature itself promotes evil and violence, human apes worship evil because evil, when you get down to it, is the biological power to dominate and be the leader. Normies and sexhavers are evil in some way or another and can gain the respect of women and others for their evil acts of bullying and punching down, while incels, oofy doofies and simps are the omega males and the misfits of nature who can't engage in evil and domination. If you are evil it means you have good genetics desirable for the species as a whole.
 
I mean hey just look at the amount of Epstein edits
 
I think they're gonna use all this to push surveillance even further. You already cant do shit anymore without getting filmed by some cunts smartphone.
Honestly the UK in this regard is just a testing ground really, Digital Id's are going to be mandatory in every country by the end of the century bare minimum (probably earlier honestly). Censorship under the guise of banning "harmful content" to protect duh children (everybody knows the goverment dgaf about any kids lol).

Things are just gonna keep getting worse every day. Reminds me of this greentext:

View attachment 1585494
Image is 100% right. There won't be total societal collapse, people won't fight back, they'll just get more and more enslaved.
 
Aren't there images?
The images are Dutch people taking photos with slaves that had their hands cut off, but they weren't cut off by the dutch themselves
 
I think they're gonna use all this to push surveillance even further. You already cant do shit anymore without getting filmed by some cunts smartphone.
Honestly the UK in this regard is just a testing ground really, Digital Id's are going to be mandatory in every country by the end of the century bare minimum (probably earlier honestly). Censorship under the guise of banning "harmful content" to protect duh children (everybody knows the goverment dgaf about any kids lol).

Things are just gonna keep getting worse every day. Reminds me of this greentext:

View attachment 1585494
Technology is being used as a Trojan Horse. The common folk think the devices they play with were created by people who just want to make everyone's life a little more easy and fun. Such naïveté.
In bygone days, if a tyrant went too far, he would be overwhelmed by a tsunami of angry people. Today's tyrants have learned from the mistakes of their toppled predecessors. They aren't about to let anyone have any privacy anymore. You'd be surprised in just how many ways you're being spied on, already. And it's getting worse.
Modern dictators are going to be nigh on impossible to bring down.
I'm glad I won't be around for very much longer to see it. But today's youngsters will, and I feel sorry for them.
 
Basically returning to the world pre christianity
 
but they weren't cut off by the dutch themselves
it wasn't? I thought it was, but it also seems like something they would do to each other. the quality of living went up after the dutch arrived geg
they would cannibalize, torture, and slaughter each other before
the peaceful savage is a myth
 
Its from the jews creating a world of sociopaths so they can finally act like themselves in public.
 

Similar threads

necromanticStygian
Replies
11
Views
1K
necromanticStygian
necromanticStygian
nakolas
Replies
14
Views
2K
shitciety
shitciety
Heroin_Man
Replies
5
Views
431
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel
Homegrownman326
Replies
8
Views
865
Enigmaz
Enigmaz
Scandi_Incel
Replies
33
Views
908
VersoffenerAssi
VersoffenerAssi

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top