I agree but why would someone who lives In a white nation expect compensation from whites because his nation was conquered and then giving it back to his people by the whites a long time ago?
S
White race is definitely superior as most white countries are high on human rights index too which indicates that white elites are not only intelligent but they are good people too. While shithole countries like India , Pakistan still have Stone age people with no sense of justice or sympathy.
Well, you are just conformed to my "natural resources" argument (typical low IQ babbling).
Also North korea and China (before 1980) contradicts your high IQ argument as well.
I also don't like get shitted on by some low IQ trailer trash whites who never saw an university in their entire fucking life yet assuming ethnics have lower IQ than them. JFL @ lobotomized white nazicels.
Exactly --
It was not long time ago, I am talking about 1800 - 1945.
IQ is subjective and depends on many other shit you dumbshit retard, start reading from here --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in_the_medieval_Islamic_world
Medieval arabs used to have way higher IQ than the entire european continent.
Read dumb fuck, read!!!
Fucking retard, their IQ did not drop. The foundation of mathematics came from the medieval arabs and iranians, well, actually the foundations of arabian mathematics came from India and china. During that time whites in the europe used to sacrifice their babies to crom-cruach.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paganism
Fuck, even your christianity is imported from the middle east. Suck on that.
Btw in reality, I think arabs inbred less than the white alabamans, that's why I said fucking read.
Last edited:
E
Just imagine what if they are to give all those money back, entire economy of the western world will collapse in a day, specially if they are to return all the resources in today's currency. LMAO.
Wrong post boyo, I am still the biggest currybasher in this forum, also @Solitarian_Walker
Well, you are just conformed to my "natural resources" argument (typical low IQ babbling).
Also North korea and China (before 1980) contradicts your high IQ argument as well.
I also don't like get shitted on by some low IQ trailer trash whites who never saw an university in their entire fucking life yet assuming ethnics have lower IQ than them. JFL @ lobotomized white nazicels.
Exactly --
It was not long time ago, I am talking about 1800 - 1945.
IQ is subjective and depends on many other shit you dumbshit retard, start reading from here --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in_the_medieval_Islamic_world
Medieval arabs used to have way higher IQ than the entire european continent.
Read dumb fuck, read!!!
1. No, you claimed countries like Ethiopia are shit because of there lack of natural resources and I said many successful countries dont have natural resources and instead use innovation and technology to fuel there economies, and some countries have like Saudi Arabia have alot of natural resources and are still shit in terms of freedom and quality of life.
2. China has had the same people who have a decent IQ, it's just they were olny recently able to make use of it because of there shitty government and culture holding them back, and same hoes for North Korea, while countries like India, and middle eastern countries have a low IQ from inbreeding and show no signs of catching up to the west like China is.
3. I'm not really even white, and More whites have seen a university than any race of shitskins so....
4. Anyone can use examples of cucks and landwhales from any race ,and FYI there are alot more examples of retarded shitskins like you the you could find of white/rice cucks
5. IT DOESNT MATTER HOW LONG AGO IT WAS, YOU CANT EXPECT COMPENSATION BECAUSE YOURE SHITTY IMBRED PEOPLE WHERE CONQURED 150 YEARS AGO EVEN IF THEY WHERE CONQUERED YESTERDAY THEN THEY SHOULD BE THANKFUL TO HAVE THERE LAND BACK AND ENGLAND STILL GETS ITS SPOILS OF WAR, just be thankful you're shitskins got there land back because no they can shit on whatever street they please it's not England fault that the shitskins never rebuilt there country like all the European countries did after they where conqured, IE France, Germany, Spain, Italy etec etc. (Spain is a great example seeing how they where under Muslim rule for 400 years, but yet they dont get compensation from the muslims)
6. IQ is literally anything but subjective, that's like saying its debatable weather Einstein or Tesla were smarter then a streetshitting curry, its objective who has the mental capacity to understand and solve certain things
7. Exactly you said it yourself MEDIEVAL arabs but they fucked themselves over by inbreeding for 1000s of years just like curries they potentially could have been in a similar stat as white society today if they didnt fuck themselves over. Arabs are very closely related to whites anyway which is why they had a similar IQ to whites before inbreeding to death.
Well, you know what? I don't give a shit. We just need our all money back, we are more eager to leave than you want us out.
S
If white race is not superior and intelligent then how do you think they conquered the entire world.
Have you ever been to any university boyo? If no, fuck off and cope. Yea that's inevitable, because you are talking about universities in the white country, ethnics are minority so are their students.
I am PhDceling in STEM btw.
S
If white race is not superior and intelligethen how do you think they conquered the entire world.
Well, there were times when mongolians conquered 80% of the world and ruled for 600 years.
ethnic uprising has begun lads 
I'll be heading off to one no too long form now (Current gpa is 4.2) , and good for you that you are not letting you're curry culture hold you back from succeeding and if more curries where like you then curryland would be a better place and curries wouldnt have to desperately expect compensation from whites, I genuinly hope you become a richcel and realize its nobodies fault but curries that India is in the current shape it's in, as other countries have succeeded through worse circumstances, also thank you for conceding and not trying to BS because there are no logical counters to my points.
May I ask what country you live in? Is it Curryland or The west?
Kek, my curry culture is not holding me back, I don't have extremely high IQ either, I know many slum dwelling street-shitting curries who have abnormally more IQ than mine.
IQ is a meme.
Yes I live in the muricaland and I want to leave but unfortunately I can't.
Also I did not concede, I want to counter and if I do it, it will be really long (because your post is also long), but I just don't have time to make long replies.
Last edited:
Exactly, my point was that IQ is minimally effected by education and means nothing if it isnt used which is why white people and Asians thrive on there genetically high IQ and streetshiters who dont use there high IQ, (even though them most of them have a lower one) have shitty countries and the lower the IQ the worse the country for EX. Africans have shitty home countries and shitty lives in good countries because of there genetics and partly culture. I'm glad you seem like you're seeing things my way brother, I'm starting to feel your university brainwashed you with the whole everyone is equal and whites are evil schtick.
I'm just really curious as I'm heading to university myself soonish, did you choose one of the top 50 national colleges, or did you save you're money and go to an average college because you know, a degree is a degree?
Obviously you should try for top schools (but they are hard to get in and also will cost more money), but if you can't, you can settle with an average school. Degree is a degree, top schools won't give you much benefit if you can't learn much. I have seen both, pathetic losers from top schoos and successful grads from average schools, it does not matter. Yea, I used to work full time and saved some money for 1 year of tution, then I funded my tution with assistantships/scholarships and other shit.
Yea, I just dont know if getting a degree from Harvard could get me a job good enough to make the degree worth it, or if it's better to go to a decent college and get a job that's probably just as good.
Kek, I never said white people are evil, we just want our stolen resources back (in cash), because they built the foundation of their entire economy with those. Cash helps, just look at dubai.
KEK
what makes you guys think you'd see any of that money? The #1 reason why shithole countries are poor is corruption.
my country got firebombed back to the stoneage and we're a major world power again. we didn't even have colonies for more than ~50 years.
japan is basically the same. it's really simple. rich countries are rich because you can trust the system, the people, the law, the police, etc.
I didnt mean it literally, but please tell me you understand that every place on earth was at one point conquered many places that were conquered still flourished through the genetics and will of there people. There several European countries that were in a worse state then India is right now but they still managed to thrive from there innovation, just look at Spain that was in turmoil after losing it colonies and wealth, look at France that went through a bloody revoultion where it people were starving, Post WW1 Germany and WW2 Germany. Granted France used some of it colonies to rebuild itself but it still left those colonies in better shape then when it arrived.
There is no argument that Europe is to blame for the state of the 3rd world, and anybody who has read any history book shouldnt believe that any conquered civilataion deserves restitution for being conquered as that's just how things work.
This to @chudur-budur
The actual money lost by corruption is extremely small portion of the actual GDP (in India, also similar in most other countries). The main problem of poverty is severe economic deficit (spend more than you earn, or you earn nothing), not corruption. Corruption is not very difficult to cure, you just need highly-paid police force and very fast judicial system (money again).
Japan's case is different, I would say that's an exception. Japan would become like north korea if it did not succumbed to the Allied forces demand after WWII. Japan traded military power with business opportunity. The same thing happened with Thailand. Although japan already used to be a strong economic power before WWI, but Thailand was not. Japan progressed because they have very high sense of self value of strong sense of nationalism. These things are not present in the post colonial countries, these senses waned out from a long period of subordination and can't be recovered. This is why post colonial countries worships white so much.
IQ is a meme, the ethnicity with the most high IQ are Inuits and Eskimos. But they live in Igloo and still live hunter-gatherer life style.
Hard work is a meme, I think mexicans are the most hard working people out there. Curries too.
Honesty is meme, I don't need to expand on this. This shit simply just doesn't exist.
Ground truth: you can't earn money by being morally ideal, no strong empire or economy grew by being just high IQ, honest or hard-working. These are just memes. You need to be ruthlessly evil and shrewd to earn money. Also @YungCell
Last edited:
YOU really wrote this shit, ethnic bashing and whitey points. you are either a faggot Julycel LARP, or your a ethnic COON. which is it?
d e s i g n a t e d s h i t t i n g s t r e e t
I prefer shitting beach over streets. I am a professional street-shitter and street-shitting enthusiast, just to add in case if you did not know.
@YungCell exactly sounds like those stormfronter fags, yet he claims he is an egyptian, no idea about the truth.
Last edited:
JFL at this gif hahahah
Why didn't whites stay outside of ethnic society, then? Nah, time to colonize Europe.
B
Years before colonization, European societies in general were superior to non European ones. Each race had its time, but Africans never did.
Coming in as a rapeugee =/= colonizing
You’re acting as if Europeans were not invaded by Turks and mongols and other tribes before...
Coming in as a rapeugee =/= colonizing
Last edited:
Don't worry, pal. You people will be the ones getting conquered this time around.
Chinese have already colonized Canada and Australia. Muslimcels are busy getting into Europe. Give it 20 years and it'll be all over for Europecels
Years before colonization, European societies in general were superior to non European ones. Each race had its time, but Africans never did.
You’re acting as if Europeans were not invaded by Turks and mongols and other tribes before...
Coming in as a rapeugee =/= colonizing
Coming in as a refugee = Trojan Horse Strategy.
Demographics is destiny. An influx of millions of male 'refugees' is going to change any country's demographics massively. So yes, it is colonization. Not the centrally-planned colonization of old but colonization nonetheless.
PS: You ever heard one of those 'refugees' posting on an incel board? Nah they're too busy fucking and reproducing.
Look man you're not really wrong, I'm sure its realistically a middl
A person who has objective looked at the world and noticed certain traits and patterns among certain people.
I cant even hate on the rapefuges for trying to make there personal lives better by invading Europe, I blame the cucked Europeans for willingly letting there countries be taken.Don't worry, pal. You people will be the ones getting conquered this time around.
Chinese have already colonized Canada and Australia. Muslimcels are busy getting into Europe. Give it 20 years and it'll be all over for Europecels
Coming in as a refugee = Trojan Horse Strategy.
Demographics is destiny. An influx of millions of male 'refugees' is going to change any country's demographics massively. So yes, it is colonization. Not the centrally-planned colonization of old but colonization nonetheless.
PS: You ever heard one of those 'refugees' posting on an incel board? Nah they're too busy fucking and reproducing.
Truth of the matter is Rapefuges will always have shitty lives because even if they conquer Europe they will make it as much of a shithole as there home countries are now, so nobody wins.
Also, let's say Europe is conquered and then takes its independence back we all agree that it wouldnt recive compensation right? @chudur-budur
That's a whole different stance, if revenge is what you're after then go for it, if retarded Europeans are gonna let there enemies in with open arms then it's there fault.
Last edited:
Yes they did, read about nubian black pharaohs.
JFL @ the race war in this thread.
Ikr it's retarded cope
B
Nubian pharaos were phenotypically and racially negroes, they established their kingdom on the northern africa but they are originated in somewhere else --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-fifth_Dynasty_of_Egypt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Kush
Yea some negroes were definitely kangz at a certain time.
Probably another Mossad false flag, fucking juden scum
We wuz kangz cope
It doesn't seem terror related, guy was from Sudan and didn't seem very religious. Hopefully we'll know his motive soon.
Exactly. What a fail.
He had to do one thing in his shitty life and he failed. And there is no retry.
Lol at incels arguing which race is superior.
Our personal lifes suck guys, that is what matters.
I equally hate white and black foids and normies. Actually more whites - my race - since those have wronged me.
Ure invited to do the same.
Lets just get our revenge first and then if we survive we can maybe joke about our colors.
Last edited:
white society? fuck off cunt if you think that then dont come to our white countries, i hate people like this.
its true though, white society=the west. and the west is where ethnics suffer the most. i have no problem going back to UAE, but u white fuckers invades all country and took our women and now the only thing they crave is white cock. I wish Hitler won so all ethnics had there countries to themselves and whites had their land aswell, i hate multiculturism. maybe if whiteys didnt conquur and invade. ethnics would be way less incel
last i checked there isnt much of a white population in the UAE, previous invasions have nothing to do with this, you wont have any white competition there so its much easier there plus you can run the muslim arranged marriage game
This entire thread is a dumpster fire.
I have my disagreements with the arguments alt-right people make regarding the inferiority of non-whites but you ethnics are not making things better when you regurgitate SJW talking points.
I'd have to devote a thread to this question, but right now i'd say the main point of contention is whether you believe material and technological progress as defined by the modern world is not only a universal good but also the only thing of value there is. Because if you do, you are bound to want to deny any "higher" capacity in any race other than your own to produce such material progress, because that would imply an unquestionable superiority of those races over your own.
In a similar manner, if you believe IQ truly represents the whole of human intelligence, than you must come up with ways to rationalize why some races have higher collective IQs than others, which again would imply an unquestionable superiority.
So, does possessing an higher IQ and all that is correlated with that (such as the capacity to produce a sophisticated technological mode of living) imply a superiority? A simple glance at the utter stupidity of modernity and the incredible damage modern so called "progress" has inflicted upon the environment ought to dispel that notion. Northern Europeans possessed a vastly superior culture, as evidenced by the splendor of their art for instance, to what modernity has produced, and that was back when they possessed no particular great technological "advancement" (an advancement they had no desire of producing in the first place).
Even this obsession of wanting to credit sub-Saharan Africans for the civilization of Egypt demonstrates one has internalized the idea only material progress matters. Now, it is not only incontestable that Egypt was actually a white civilization originally, but, ironically, the things that supposedly make this civilization so "great" are actually signs of a cultural decadence. The obsession with the gigantic for instance demonstrates a loss of their spiritual center, for when one is no longer able to experience infinity inwardly one seeks it in the outside world (we see some parallels here in modernity, such as its obsession with space and futurism while relegating modern life to the quaint and mundane. Tarkovsky criticized this tendency in Solaris).
Meanwhile, Africans produced cultural artifacts that actually stand toe to toe with the best of other traditional civilizations, such as their music:
Or some of their art, such as the Yoruba heads of West Africa:
Notice that such sophistication could have only been the product of an high culture, which implies the villages where much of this culture still survives were part of a larger "civilization", certainly not in the modern sense of the word but in no wise different from the type of "civilization" the Northern Europeans possessed. But we are talking about civilizations based on particular cultural structures and not defined solely by any kind of material advancement.
And even in the modern west, Africans had their own cultural impact:
So is the intelligence found in this music not intelligence, even if it falls out of what IQ tests can measure? What about the "intelligence" behind something like the Psalms of the Bible, or the Vedas of ancient India, or the intelligence that gave us the beauty of Gothic Cathedrals:
None of which can be measured by an IQ test. Is this not intelligence? Is this not "advancement"?
I have my disagreements with the arguments alt-right people make regarding the inferiority of non-whites but you ethnics are not making things better when you regurgitate SJW talking points.
I'd have to devote a thread to this question, but right now i'd say the main point of contention is whether you believe material and technological progress as defined by the modern world is not only a universal good but also the only thing of value there is. Because if you do, you are bound to want to deny any "higher" capacity in any race other than your own to produce such material progress, because that would imply an unquestionable superiority of those races over your own.
In a similar manner, if you believe IQ truly represents the whole of human intelligence, than you must come up with ways to rationalize why some races have higher collective IQs than others, which again would imply an unquestionable superiority.
So, does possessing an higher IQ and all that is correlated with that (such as the capacity to produce a sophisticated technological mode of living) imply a superiority? A simple glance at the utter stupidity of modernity and the incredible damage modern so called "progress" has inflicted upon the environment ought to dispel that notion. Northern Europeans possessed a vastly superior culture, as evidenced by the splendor of their art for instance, to what modernity has produced, and that was back when they possessed no particular great technological "advancement" (an advancement they had no desire of producing in the first place).
Even this obsession of wanting to credit sub-Saharan Africans for the civilization of Egypt demonstrates one has internalized the idea only material progress matters. Now, it is not only incontestable that Egypt was actually a white civilization originally, but, ironically, the things that supposedly make this civilization so "great" are actually signs of a cultural decadence. The obsession with the gigantic for instance demonstrates a loss of their spiritual center, for when one is no longer able to experience infinity inwardly one seeks it in the outside world (we see some parallels here in modernity, such as its obsession with space and futurism while relegating modern life to the quaint and mundane. Tarkovsky criticized this tendency in Solaris).
Meanwhile, Africans produced cultural artifacts that actually stand toe to toe with the best of other traditional civilizations, such as their music:
Or some of their art, such as the Yoruba heads of West Africa:
Notice that such sophistication could have only been the product of an high culture, which implies the villages where much of this culture still survives were part of a larger "civilization", certainly not in the modern sense of the word but in no wise different from the type of "civilization" the Northern Europeans possessed. But we are talking about civilizations based on particular cultural structures and not defined solely by any kind of material advancement.
And even in the modern west, Africans had their own cultural impact:
So is the intelligence found in this music not intelligence, even if it falls out of what IQ tests can measure? What about the "intelligence" behind something like the Psalms of the Bible, or the Vedas of ancient India, or the intelligence that gave us the beauty of Gothic Cathedrals:
None of which can be measured by an IQ test. Is this not intelligence? Is this not "advancement"?
Last edited:
B
Were these empires as advanced as the ones in Europe, Persia, And China?
W
White womyn are the problem but only men like DAILY STORMER are the ones to admit this while white nationalist cucks would allow white womyn to destroy this planet.
I am talking about 700-600 BC, roman empire even did not start yet or just started. And the rest of the europe was still hunter-gatherers. Only contemporary civilization akin to nubia is Achaemenid empire in Iraq/Persia. I would say they were similarly developed:
Nubian city:
Achaemenid persepolis:
Also nubians are the first who started to make pyramids, therefore their pyramids are still smaller than those of giza.
B
Low IQ asfI am talking about 700-600 BC, roman empire even did not start yet or just started. And the rest of the europe was still hunter-gatherers. Only contemporary civilization akin to nubia is Achaemenid empire in Iraq/Persia. I would say they were similarly developed:
Nubian city:
Achaemenid persepolis:
Also nubians are the first who started to make pyramids, therefore their pyramids are still smaller than those of giza.
There were important civilizations that flourished in Europe up until 1200 BC, far before the Africans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Europe
Are you seriously that retard? Minoans were not whites, they were brown skin North Africans.
Read about Indus Valley Civilization, they were all blacks as well (3300 BC).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indus_Valley_Civilisation
At least when a Moslem dies, he gets 72 virgins.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
