Ted Bundy quote

[ubermensch666]

>"I learned that all moral judgments are 'value judgments,' that all value judgments are subjective, and that none can be proved to be either “right” or “wrong.” I even read somewhere that the Chief Justice of the United States had written that the American Constitution expressed nothing more than collective value judgments. Believe it or not, I figured out for myself—what apparently the Chief Justice couldn’t figure out for himself—that if the rationality of one value judgment was zero, multiplying it by millions would not make it one whit more rational. Nor is there any “reason” to obey the law for anyone, like myself, who has the boldness and daring “the strength of character” to throw off its shackles. . . .I discovered that to become truly free, truly unfettered, I had to become truly uninhibited. And I quickly discovered that the greatest obstacle to my freedom, the greatest block, and limitation to it, consists in the insupportable “value judgment” that I was bound to respect the rights of others. I asked myself, who were these “others”? Other human beings, with human rights? Why is it more wrong to kill a human animal than any other animal, a pig or a sheep or a steer? Is your life more to you than a hog’s life to a hog? Why should I be willing to sacrifice my pleasure more for the one than for the other? Surely, you would not, in this age of scientific enlightenment, declare that God or nature has marked some pleasures as “moral” or “good” and others as “immoral” or “bad”?

He was a superior guy. He was a true nihilist. One Ubermensch. It's so funny see these "nihilistic atheist" of reddit. They call yourself nihilist but have moral values. The truth is that most of people simply cant ignore the morality who they was teach. One example is Richard Dawkins, he said on Twitter that eugenics works but condemned for "moral dilemmas". How can a evolutionist atheist condemn natural selection made by humans?
He cant explain why.

 

[TheLastandtheFirst]

Because while a small portion of humanity deals with existentialism, most just adopt the narrative that society imposes on them and then bends it to their own subjective, biased perception of what is right and wrong.

The "life has no meaning, there is no god, you only live once" narrative has been pushed on the West not because the elites are educated and sophisticated enough to actually entangle with existentialism, rather, it's because urban elites want to act out their desires judgment free.

Good old Baptist Grandma and her ilk from Florida, and like families, still constrain, to a limited degree, what's morally acceptable for what the urban elites are allowed to do, much like slaves still have some power of shaming over their masters, so much so people like Obama and Trump have to faux-identify as a Christian just to virtue signal. Destroy their belief system, you destroy your critics.

Atheists on reddit mimic those urban elites to create a faux illusion of sophistication and superiority, but nobody buys it because they have a passion for those retard narratives that the elites don't have (that is, to appear higher status than they actually are).

Praised be the Morning Star

Indeed. There is no turning back, good luck weathering the void; hopefully your inner light is enough to transform you.

 

[TheLastandtheFirst]

Also, I truly think people like Dawkins are blackpilled, or at least redpilled. However, he's bound by social narratives.

No different than Nietzsche and even Hitler trying to make the autistic claim that Jesus was a non-Jewish Aryan but Paul ruined everything. 100% done to appease the cultural zeitgeist of the day, no way did Hitler view Christianity as a good thing that happened. Nietzsche, on the other hand, was a bit more complicated and I think recognized some deep value in Christianity despite it's decadent moral system.