Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Takeaways from looking at the current meta of blackpilling normies on tiktok—bp edits

  • Thread starter femcelbreedingnig
  • Start date
femcelbreedingnig

femcelbreedingnig

Repugnant, Abrasive, Abhorrent
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 1, 2025
Posts
3,449
“Show your face bro”
Which literally means ‘I want to confirm my suspicion that the type of people who I don’t agree with must look like losers’ and by losers, they mean sub5s. And if you’re attractive, then you somehow have some authority and privilege to be lookist and ‘put others down.’ Literally proving the blackpill every time.

“this exists to put other people down”
When normies say this, they are subconsciously agreeing that looks aren’t subjective, and that the models do indeed look better than the person in the intro. Not only that, comparing looks is so brutal, it is considered ‘putting another person down’ which is the sub5 in all of these cases. In fact, when you see the rare edit of deformed sub3s getting compared to models, the comments have a depressed, mature tone from normies, saying ‘too far:feelsbadman:’ (and I say rare because they usually get taken down moreso than the other ones… proving the blackpilled nature of ‘bullying and harassment’ guidelines of these platforms)

“Please don’t comment on my looks”
Really? So you’re telling me out of everything in the world people can comment on, one of the few things that you care so much about to ask people to not talk about is your looks? But looks don’t matter?

“Job application”
We live in a society where people are flexing being a wagecuck, but not flexing having great social lives. Wonder why:waitwhat:?
It is also implies that you should suspect that everyone online is some NEET. And not just everyone, but men. When the fuck do you see these sorts of comments on female centric niches? Proving that men are deemed as disposable tools
 
Last edited:
“Show your face bro" is BY FAR the most stupid one, confirming BP isn't an own against BP, this is basic common sense.
Just Deny BP By Proving BP Theory.
 
“Show your face bro" is BY FAR the most stupid one, confirming BP isn't an own against BP, this is basic common sense.
Just Deny BP By Proving BP Theory.
Goes to show you how stupidly bluepilled most normies are.

Just floating through life without a second thought in their NPC brains.

Makes you misanthropic
 
“Show your face bro" is BY FAR the most stupid one, confirming BP isn't an own against BP, this is basic common sense.
Just Deny BP By Proving BP Theory.
They usually do it whenever you criticize women
 
“this exists to put other people down”
These kinds of replies annoy the shit out of me. Today I came across a video where an unattractive guy was deluding himself with nonsense; it was mainly absurd ideas such as "there's someone out there for everyone." There were men in the replies who simply told him the honest truth — that it's over — and annoyingly enough, there were women trying to take the moral high ground by saying how it's only men saying that, as if that vindicates them. These same women, who are virtue signaling and gaslighting clueless men like him online, are the very same people who would treat him like scum in real life, yet they try to paint themselves as morally superior when men expose the truth about lookism.
 
Goes to show you how stupidly bluepilled most normies are.

Just floating through life without a second thought in their NPC brains.

Makes you misanthropic
it proves to me at least that bluepill is more harmful than blackpill
because they're basically judging an argument based on an ad-hominem against a hard-to-change characteristics; its just plain lookism. are they saying that ugly people can't have opinions?

worst part is they don't even think they're being discriminatory. they genuinely believe that ugly people are ontologically bad.
 
Last edited:
they're basically judging an argument based on an ad-hominem against a hard-to-change characteristics
Normies have always mostly resorted to the ad hominem route when confronted with the blackpill.

Even snarky platitudes are ad hominems in my eyes. “Just take a shower bro” implying you’re dirty and gross basement dweller for your awareness of the truth

there were women trying to take the moral high ground by saying how it's only men saying that, as if that vindicates them.
Yea, it’s only other sub5 men with more age, wisdom, etc who can predict the outcomes of other younger sub5 men JFL
They usually do it whenever you criticize women
normies online say this everywhere. It’s like a new thing that took off with them, where if you comment on someone’s looks, you must show yourself. As if it’s some high school lunchroom banter
 
Last edited:
The meta for blackpilling normalfags is just showing them the way modern women treat men they don't find attractive.
 
The meta for blackpilling normalfags is just showing them the way modern women treat men they don't find attractive.
That’s when you get into the whole “it’s different for personalitymaxxed grass touchers” “I’m social and do fine” “I know a guy” debates

Tiktokers are still saying this
 
”But you are a ________”:feelstastyman::feelstastyman:
 
”But you are a ________”:feelstastyman::feelstastyman:
And, “it’s all doom and gloom hopelessness” meanwhile they are depressed incels in denials themselves, having suicidal thoughts because they let a foid into their heart as a sub8 JFL
 
All the edits are copy and paste slop. The only based bp tiktok account with creativity is @PLA1092 ’s
 
Another thing they I’ve seen multiple bluepillers on there say is “jeff bezos bro. Elon musk bro. Mark Zuckerberg bro”

All these dudes are white passing. The richest is the tallest, and has the highest IQ. And most CEOs are promoted through climbing the ladder.

Meaning the more great the shallow aspects of your genes are, the more likely you are to be promoted at work.
 
“Show your face bro”
Which literally means ‘I want to confirm my suspicion that the type of people who I don’t agree with must look like losers’ and by losers, they mean sub5s. And if you’re attractive, then you somehow have some authority and privilege to be lookist and ‘put others down.’ Literally proving the blackpill every time.

“this exists to put other people down”
When normies say this, they are subconsciously agreeing that looks aren’t subjective, and that the models do indeed look better than the person in the intro. Not only that, comparing looks is so brutal, it is considered ‘putting another person down’ which is the sub5 in all of these cases. In fact, when you see the rare edit of deformed sub3s getting compared to models, the comments have a depressed, mature tone from normies, saying ‘too far:feelsbadman:’ (and I say rare because they usually get taken down moreso than the other ones… proving the blackpilled nature of ‘bullying and harassment’ guidelines of these platforms)

“Please don’t comment on my looks”
Really? So you’re telling me out of everything in the world people can comment on, one of the few things that you care so much about to ask people to not talk about is your looks? But looks don’t matter?

“Job application”
We live in a society where people are flexing being a wagecuck, but not flexing having great social lives. Wonder why:waitwhat:?
It is also implies that you should suspect that everyone online is some NEET. And not just everyone, but men. When the fuck do you see these sorts of comments on female centric niches? Proving that men are deemed as disposable tools
Another one:
“grown man editting another man”
You still don’t get it, do you, bluepillers? These people aren’t validated for existing, so they aren’t secure within their masculinity. Chad can do whatever the fuck he wants sitting on his PC, while HTBs from tinder are on standby ready to give him blowjobs underneath his chair. It doesn’t matter what you do

This ties in well with the job application one. These men have internalized misandry they need to work through:
IMG 2599

Sub8 men believe if they aren’t being workhorse tools to some overlords, then they are useless and shouldn’t take up space. Meanwhile everyone else is conditioned to feel good about themselves just for existing. This is your brain on andrew tate and third wave foidminism, where men are tools of the matriarchy supported by those who choose to compete in it, rather than tear it down

I just saw another one. “with a job, you making your life better too,by not being useless and having money” they’re telling this to a 15 year old tiktokcel btw “don’t spend 20 minutes a day looksmaxxing. Wageslave instead for $7.25 per hour” JFL
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

femcelbreedingnig
Replies
8
Views
443
LOLI BREEDING
LOLI BREEDING
DBS
Replies
23
Views
612
underballer
U
U
Replies
9
Views
492
WastedPotential
WastedPotential
Eddiesicoy
Replies
14
Views
635
PolskiKartofel
PolskiKartofel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top