
starystulejarz
30+ years old khfl slavcel neetcel (13yrs+) virgin
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 2, 2018
- Posts
- 15,597
Probably because same feature as on desktop LCDs which let you use more wattage to get much lower input lag, they could shut it down completely to squeeze more battery life from their pathetic hardware. They went completely overboard, switch 2 should've been OLED console from the start it just can't work with extremely inefficient LCDHow does it have worse input lag than switch 1?![]()
they're waiting to resell the OLED down the line for $600. Nintendo is a joke.Probably because same feature as on desktop LCDs which let you use more wattage to get much lower input lag, they could shut it down completely to squeeze more battery life from their pathetic hardware. They went completely overboard, switch 2 should've been OLED console from the start it just can't work with extremely inefficient LCD
He showed that switch 1 had less input lag. That amount of input lag is embarrassing.I'd argue Nintendo never should have went OLED unless they could lock every game to 60hz. Which they haven't with Switch 2 that I'm seeing. Frame doubling is horrible.
I don't understand the point of that video. Of course, IPS/VA monitors have significantly better response times than a handheld. And if you care about input lag, why are you buying a Switch?
Mate both switch 1/2 and desktop were LCD in that testI don't understand the point of that video. Of course, IPS/VA monitors have significantly better response times than a handheld. And if you care about input lag, why are you buying a Switch?
Yep double dipping as alwaysthey're waiting to resell the OLED down the line for $600. Nintendo is a joke.
Yes, but a 7" handheld that can get away with whatever low resolution and purposely made for low power usage is comparing apples and oranges to a PC monitor. Of course, they're going to cut costs there as every handheld does except maybe the premium ones now.Mate both switch 1/2 and desktop were LCD in that test
Dude switch 1, psp and any low-mid end phones have much better screen than current dogshit switch 2, they have literally zero excuses to make such awful screens with dreadful input lag on a GAMING DEVICEYes, but a 7" handheld that can get away with whatever low resolution and purposely made for low power usage is comparing apples and oranges to a PC monitor. Of course, they're going to cut costs there as every handheld does except maybe the premium ones now.
And it's the Switch. You're not buying it for specs. Being able to use it as a handheld and then dock it adds more lag.
Nintendo cucks will ALWAYS buy this btw
They dont care because tendies dont care as long as they get nostalgia baited by same old ipsDude switch 1, psp and any low-mid end phones have much better screen than current dogshit switch 2, they have literally zero excuses to make such awful screens with dreadful input lag on a GAMING DEVICE
Switch 1 LCD is still horrible compared to monitors, Switch 2 is worse. Nintendo cut costs, not surprising.Dude switch 1, psp and any low-mid end phones have much better screen than current dogshit switch 2, they have literally zero excuses to make such awful screens with dreadful input lag on a GAMING DEVICE