Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Sub 8 theorists...

ColdLightOfDay

ColdLightOfDay

Serge’s alt.
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 18, 2018
Posts
5,704
Are you technically okay with men in the
5-7 looks range being on this forum because you consider them to be incels as well?

This is what I don’t get about sub 8 theory, if almost every man is an incel then surely almost every man would be welcome here, and there is technically no such thing as a ‘normie male’ or a spectrum of male smv, just a clear line between incels and Chads.
 
@Weed is a solid 6, some people call him a 7

I believe in sub7 law, not sub8, but either way, yes, I believe "normiecels" exist
 
Last edited:
I ok with blackpilled men being here
 
200
 
Yes, normies are incels as well if they dont buxx themselves into cuckedness or go for 1/10 whales.

The difference is that normies can buxx/become a cuck, while incels only barely can, and truecels can't even do that. But they're all incels. Chad or gg.
 
No,I think it should be sub-6
 
Yes, normies are incels as well if they dont buxx themselves into cuckedness or go for 1/10 whales.

The difference is that normies can buxx/become a cuck, while incels only barely can, and truecels can't even do that. But they're all incels. Chad or gg.
 
No,I think it should be sub-6

Cope.

What can a 6/10 guy get if he has no social circle? Tinder and cold approach are useless for 6/10s
 
Cope.

What can a 6/10 guy get if he has no social circle? Tinder and cold approach are useless for 6/10s
A 6/10 NT should easily be able to form a social circle.If you are non-NT,then I agree,you need to be at least 7/10(or tall 6/10)
 
A 6/10 NT should easily be able to form a social circle.If you are non-NT,then I agree,you need to be at least 7/10(or tall 6/10)

social circles aren't that easy to form lol. Normies are sociopathic as fuck. Although I suppose being NT requires sociopathic tendencies
 
I think sub 8 theory is not about sub8 men being incels
it's about 80% of men fighting for the bottom 20% scraps
 
5-6 guys are allowed if they have some mental issues.
 
I think the problem is, that as a normie you basically need the whole package. Yes they might be failed (looks-)normies, but they still are incels.

The implication for truecel looksmaxers is a really dark one, as you have to spend huge amounts of moneys, are behind in mental development and the social game and makes you land in the failed normie situation described aboe as almost by default, and at a far later point at life at that.

So I am not a sub8 tgeorist, but neither do I say normies can't be incel.
 
just look at a college classroom, its beyond over for anyone sub-7/8
 
A 5-7 is not an incel. However, only 8+/10s are actually respected by femoids. I think the 5-7s here should fuck off to looksmax and MGTOW because those communities can help them more. 5-7s can easily get becky and landwhale gfs, it's just almost certain that they will get cucked by chad. They do not exist in a physical state of inceldom but they are still not real men.
 
A 6/10 NT should easily be able to form a social circle.If you are non-NT,then I agree,you need to be at least 7/10(or tall 6/10)
Yeah, if you're NT and have trouble socially, you're probably a 4/10 or less in the most ideal circumstances.
 
Sub 8 terrorists
 
Everyone except me is having sex without buxxing.
Sub 8 theory is a cope for being in the bottom rung of society.
 
Incel = Not being able to get sex based on physical attraction, whatever, I still think that BlackPilled males should be here even not being ugly enough to be a true Incel.

I don't believe that 7/10 can't get sex.
 
Are you technically okay with men in the
5-7 looks range being on this forum because you consider them to be incels as well?

This is what I don’t get about sub 8 theory, if almost every man is an incel then surely almost every man would be welcome here, and there is technically no such thing as a ‘normie male’ or a spectrum of male smv, just a clear line between incels and Chads.
have you ever thought that maybe sub 8 theorists are high tier normies trying to justify their presence on the forum?
because I think this is the better explanation of this trend.
 
I can tolerate a 5. But the 6's and 7's can go die in a brutal car crash.
 
6 to 7/10s can be incel if theyre Short AND Non-NT.
 
7 is chad :dafuckfeels: 8 is giga chad and 9 is model.
 
have you ever thought that maybe sub 8 theorists are high tier normies trying to justify their presence on the forum?
because I think this is the better explanation of this trend.
You're on to something :waitwhat::waitwhat::waitwhat:
 
have you ever thought that maybe sub 8 theorists are high tier normies trying to justify their presence on the forum?
because I think this is the better explanation of this trend.
Of course they are man. There are plenty of larpers running psyops like sub8. Sub8 theory is idiotic, basically that's saying 95% of men are incel since looks are on a bell curve.
Cope.

What can a 6/10 guy get if he has no social circle? Tinder and cold approach are useless for 6/10s
If you're 6/10 and don't have a crippling mental illness, it is basically a given that you have a social circle.
 
Of course they are man. There are plenty of larpers running psyops like sub8. Sub8 theory is idiotic, basically that's saying 95% of men are incel since looks are on a bell curve.
true.
anyway sub 8 wasn't a thing here before the incel documentaries made last year; I think that because of them a lot of average guys with an alternative mindset decided to join the community, and now they are pushing sub 8 theory to legitimate their presence.
 
have you ever thought that maybe sub 8 theorists are high tier normies trying to justify their presence on the forum?
because I think this is the better explanation of this trend.
@Colvin76 is certainly not a high tier normie, idk about the other sub8 advocates though.
 
have you ever thought that maybe sub 8 theorists are high tier normies trying to justify their presence on the forum?
because I think this is the better explanation of this trend.
I actually think it is the opposite, I think most sub 8 theorists have a combination of truecel looks + autistic neurology. Mainly because I think most of them are coping by portraying inceldom as more prevalent than it actually is in order to take the edge off the feeling of sheer despair that accompanies realising the improbability of oneself being born incel. I think a lot of people take comfort in the idea that this is the experience of most men rather than just them self and an unlucky few and when this idea is coupled with autism (which means little point of reference with what social reality is like outside this forum) many of them become convinced that this is the way things are for almost everyone.
 
I actually think it is the opposite, I think most sub 8 theorists have a combination of truecel looks + autistic neurology. Mainly because I think most of them are coping by portraying inceldom as more prevalent than it actually is in order to take the edge off the feeling of sheer despair that accompanies realising the improbability of oneself being born incel. I think a lot of people take comfort in the idea that this is the experience of most men rather than just them self and an unlucky few and when this idea is coupled with autism (which means little point of reference with what social reality is like outside this forum) many of them become convinced that this is the way things are for almost everyone.
yes, this could also be a valid explanation.
even if trucel looking guys are a minority and I see sub 8 pushed by so many users that It's hard to believe they're all so hideous.
idk man
 
Wrong

7 = chadlite
8 = Chad
9 = gigaChad (or model if you want to call it that)
4 is average due to the average man being around 4 In PSL rating. 5 would be chadlite and 6 would be Chad. 10/10 is flawless which maybe 4 people alive is.
 
What happened to muh sub-8 = incel
Only getting to fuck whales and sub3 foids isnt exactly ascending. Betabuxxing is also not ascension. That is the only thing sub8s can get.
 
yes, this could also be a valid explanation.
even if trucel looking guys are a minority and I see sub 8 pushed by so many users that It's hard to believe they're all so hideous.
idk man
I believe most users here are average or a little below average. The truecels like SaintBlackops2cel are very rare tbh.
 
I actually think it is the opposite, I think most sub 8 theorists have a combination of truecel looks + autistic neurology. Mainly because I think most of them are coping by portraying inceldom as more prevalent than it actually is in order to take the edge off the feeling of sheer despair that accompanies realising the improbability of oneself being born incel. I think a lot of people take comfort in the idea that this is the experience of most men rather than just them self and an unlucky few and when this idea is coupled with autism (which means little point of reference with what social reality is like outside this forum) many of them become convinced that this is the way things are for almost everyone.
High IQ post

I'll add that they usually don't know what a 5/10, 6/10, or 7/10 male looks like. If the guy isnt a bonafide 8/10 and shorter than 6 feet, they'll automatically peg him as being incel. This is stupid to do since atleast 9 out of 10 men I see in public dont match the criteria being a 8/10 facially or 6feet tall. There's only one place on earth where Sub8 theory may be valid and that's Europe.

A while back, there was a thread where a picture of 7/10 white guy appeared and @Colvin76 was trying to rate him as a 4/10 and calling him a subhuman.
 
High IQ post

I'll add that they usually don't know what a 5/10, 6/10, or 7/10 male looks like. If the guy isnt a bonafide 8/10 and shorter than 6 feet, they'll automatically peg him as being incel. This is stupid to do since atleast 9 out of 10 men I see in public dont match the criteria being a 8/10 facially or 6feet tall. There's only one place on earth where Sub8 theory may be valid and that's Europe.

A while back, there was a thread where a picture of 7/10 white guy appeared and @Colvin76 was trying to rate him as a 4/10 and calling him a subhuman.
Really? Show me the picture of the guy. I need to be sure that you aren't making stuff up.

Sure I probably rate pretty strict by 1 or 1.5 points or whatever. However, 3 points is just insane.
 
4 is average due to the average man being around 4 In PSL rating. 5 would be chadlite and 6 would be Chad. 10/10 is flawless which maybe 4 people alive is.
Dude, those are looksmax digits, nobody rates in PSL here
Really? Show me the picture of the guy. I need to be sure that you aren't making stuff up.

Sure I probably rate pretty strict by 1 or 1.5 points or whatever. However, 3 points is just insane.
I dont even remember what thread it was in and you stood corrected when I called it out. You were off atleast 2 points minimum there buddy.
 
I dont even remember what thread it was in and you stood corrected when I called it out. You were off atleast 2 points minimum there buddy.
"I don't even remeber what thread it was"

Then your claims are invalid. How can you say I overrate by 3 points when you can't even back up your claim? Come on man.....

Hypothetically, lets say that I said that you called a 5/10 normie a gigachad. How would you expect people to believe me if I gave no proof / thread / picture? This is the same thing youre doing here but reverse. You're making claims without proof / picture / thread link.
 
A 6/10 NT should easily be able to form a social circle.If you are non-NT,then I agree,you need to be at least 7/10(or tall 6/10)
true, but if you haven't had a gf or a date by age 17, then you aren't NT by default.
 
Still doesn't prove your point.

Link me the thread where I """"overrated by 3 points"""" and then I will believe you. Otherwise, you are lying.
It's there, if you dig deep enough, you can find it too.

If I knew you would lose your grip over this Sub8 topic, I would of screenshotted it tbh

I'll look for it later.
 
I actually think it is the opposite, I think most sub 8 theorists have a combination of truecel looks + autistic neurology. Mainly because I think most of them are coping by portraying inceldom as more prevalent than it actually is in order to take the edge off the feeling of sheer despair that accompanies realising the improbability of oneself being born incel. I think a lot of people take comfort in the idea that this is the experience of most men rather than just them self and an unlucky few and when this idea is coupled with autism (which means little point of reference with what social reality is like outside this forum) many of them become convinced that this is the way things are for almost everyone.
Hi iq plausible answer.
 
I actually think it is the opposite, I think most sub 8 theorists have a combination of truecel looks + autistic neurology. Mainly because I think most of them are coping by portraying inceldom as more prevalent than it actually is in order to take the edge off the feeling of sheer despair that accompanies realising the improbability of oneself being born incel. I think a lot of people take comfort in the idea that this is the experience of most men rather than just them self and an unlucky few and when this idea is coupled with autism (which means little point of reference with what social reality is like outside this forum) many of them become convinced that this is the way things are for almost everyone.
I don't know I see average looking guys get destroyed verbally by women for daring to ask them out. And you should hear what women say about their normie boyfriends.
 

Similar threads

DeathSigil
Replies
20
Views
601
yeetbender.koala
yeetbender.koala
Apex.Koala
Replies
5
Views
271
Darth Koala Khan
Darth Koala Khan
Rapistcel
Replies
22
Views
1K
Runt171
Runt171
Leonardo Part V
Replies
84
Views
2K
Cybersex is our hope
Cybersex is our hope
matkaboskaNEETowska
Replies
12
Views
994
WhereIsHamudi
WhereIsHamudi

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top