Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [STUDY] Women have more homophobic dating preferences than men. But feminazis complain about men who watch lesbian porn without harassing lesbians

E

Edmund_Kemper

Disregard my larping efforts. I can’t change it.
-
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Posts
25,309
DISCLAIMER: THIS NOT ME CLAIMING TO BE ATTRACTED TO MEN DON'T CALL KNAJJD

In one survey of 1,015 women ages 18-44 from Glamour, it found that 63% said they won't date a man who has had sex with another man, even if he is straight/bicurious or bisexual. Hypocritically, 47% of the women say they've been attracted to another woman, and 31% of them have had another sexual experience with another woman. Of those women:

93% said they'd kissed

85% said they'd touched a partner's breasts or genitals

63% reported receiving oral sex

55% reported giving oral sex

Other research has shown that women won't date bisexual men. In the study "Swipe Left on the Bi Guys: Examining Attitudes Toward Dating and Being Sexual With Bisexual Individuals":
In qualitative research conducted in a midsized American city, Callis (2013) found that the many nonbisexual participants would not date a bisexual person, and that important differences emerged along gender lines. For example, eight out of 13 heterosexual women versus only two of 13 heterosexual men stated that they would not date a bisexual man or woman, respectively. Among the seven lesbian-identified participants, only one indicated that she would not date a bisexual woman; however the majority reported knowing lesbians in their community who refused to date bisexual women. This aligns with the experiences of bisexual women in the study who reported particular difficulty finding lesbian women willing to date them. Four out of eight gay male participants shared that they would not date a bisexual man. Callis (2013) noted that participants’ rationale for their decisions closely aligned with well-documented stereotypes about bisexual people. For example, heterosexual women reported concerns that bisexual men would be more likely to have an STI or be unfaithful. Heterosexual male participants, however, cited stereotypes about hypersexuality in their willingness to date bisexual women, noting the potential for “more sex” or the opportunity to experience a threesome with another woman.
In a quantitative, online study of heterosexual men and women, Armstrong and Reissing (2014) also found evidence for gender differences in attitudes toward engaging in casual sex, dating, or a committed relationship with a bisexual person. All participants expressed negative attitudes toward engaging with bisexual people, and this negativity increased with the commitment level of the relationship. However, across all three relationship types, women reported more negative attitudes than men about partnering with a bisexual person. Specifically, women endorsed concerns that reflected stereotypes about hypersexuality and the presumed instability of a bisexual orientation, such that a bisexual male partner may “become gay in the future,” would be unsatisfied with a female partner, and would cheat on them with, or leave the relationship for, a man. Such results parallel the work of Mohr and Rochlen (1999), who found that cisgender men were more accepting of female bisexuality than cisgender women, and the work of Yost and Thomas (2012) who found that cisgender men were less accepting of bisexual men than bisexual women.
In the research paper's experimental design of 224 straight women, 120 straight men and 96 gay men:
rather than asking participants to self-report attitudes toward dating and being sexual with bisexual individuals in general, this study utilized minor deception to assess attitudes toward dating specific hypothetical individuals. Participants were asked to complete a survey about online dating in which they were shown dating profiles of men and women randomly depicted as either straight, gay, or bisexual. They were then asked to rate the profiles on how sexually and romantically attractive they found the individuals, how much they would like to date and have sex with the individuals, and how masculine or feminine they found the individuals.
To measure whether participants attended to the sexual orientations listed on the profiles, they were asked at two points during the survey to report the sexual orientation listed on the profile they previously viewed (one question came after a male profile, and one after a female profile). Results indicated that 12.5% (n=28) of heterosexual women and 20.8%
(n=20) of gay men failed to report the correct sexual orientation of the male profile, and 22.5% (n=27) of heterosexual men failed to report the correct sexual orientation of the female profile. However, removing these participants did not ultimately change the significance of the MANOVA analyses for heterosexual women, (F(10, 2726)=7.61, p<.001; g2=.03, heterosexual men, F(10, 1288) = 5.34, p < .001, g2 = .04), or gay men, F(10, 1034) = 1.21, p = .28; g2 = .01. Therefore, the decision was ultimately made to include these participants in the analysis.
Here's the abstract:
Dating and maintaining romantic relationships can often be difficult for bisexual people due to binegativity and related negative stereotypes. The current study utilized an experimen- tal design to investigate attitudes toward dating and being sexual with bisexual individuals. A convenience sample of 440 participants, including 224 heterosexual women, 120 heterosexual men, and 96 gay men was recruited to complete an online survey. Participants were shown seven cisgender male and seven cisgender female dating profiles with various sexual orientations. Participants rated each profile on measures of attractiveness and masculinity/femininity. Results indicated that heterosexual women rated bisexual men as less sexually and romantically attractive, less desirable to date and have sex with, and less masculine compared to straight men. No such differences were found for heterosexual and gay men’s ratings of female and male profiles, respectively. These results support previous research findings that indicate more negative atti- tudes toward dating bisexual men than bisexual women. The current study also provides further understanding as to how negative attitudes influence sexual and romantic attraction to bisexual individuals. Areas for future research are discussed.
Here are the results. Apparently women are less attracted to men in general than vice versa, but yep, women hate bisexual men:
Screen Shot 2021 12 02 at 115233 AM


In another study, they found the same exact results:
Screen Shot 2021 12 04 at 123742 PM

This shows that straight women are a lot less willing than straight men to date bisexual men and less willing to date bisexuals than even lesbians. It even finds lesbians are less willing than gay/bisexual men to date bisexuals of the same gender. It also finds that bisexual women are less willing than bisexual men to date or have sex with or engage in sexual/romantic activities with bisexual men although slightly more willing than bisexual men to enter relationships with bisexual men. It also finds that bisexual women are more willing to date/have sex with/enter relationships with/engage in romantic or sexual activity with other bisexual women than with bisexual men whereas bisexual men are more willing to date/have sex with/enter relationships with/engage in romantic or sexual activity with bisexual women than with other bisexual men.

TL;DR So it's women who have homophobic dating preferences (they won’t date bisexuals but men will) yet feminazis complain about men simply watching lesbian porn.
 
Last edited:
Wtf? You missed all the point of that shit, that ALMOST FIFTY FUCKING PERCENT OF FOIDS SAID THEY WERE ATTRACTED TO OTHER FOIDS and 20% of them said they had sex.

Even foids can get foids much easier than yes, that's brutal af
 
Wtf? You missed all the point of that shit, that ALMOST FIFTY FUCKING PERCENT OF FOIDS SAID THEY WERE ATTRACTED TO OTHER FOIDS and 20% of them said they had sex.

Even foids can get foids much easier than yes, that's brutal af
You weren't lesbianpilled before? :waitwhat:
I thought this was obvious to any zoomer/late millennialcel.
 
You weren't lesbianpilled before? :waitwhat:
I thought this was obvious to any zoomer/late millennialcel.
Yes, but it's still brutal af and not acknowledged often here (Idk why tf dogpill is talked more often)
 
47% of the women say they've been attracted to another woman, and 31% of them have had another sexual experience with another woman. Of those women
This line had me worried, so I saw the article and:
Sex love life 2016 02 gay straight composite main

It looks like the survey focused mostly on these types of, uh, "people".
So it's women who have homophobic dating preferences (they won’t date bisexuals but men will) yet feminazis complain about men simply watching lesbian porn
If some foid ever complained about me watching lesbian porn, I would ask "do you watch gay porn?" so that gives me two options:
Case A) She says "Yes" - I call her a hypocrite
Case B) She says "No" - I call her homophobic, bigoted, and cisheteronormative
:dab:
 
Last edited:
This needs more replies
 
This needs more replies and it doesn’t
 
The patriarchy made them do it.
 
Clown if you use "homophobia" unironically
 
Wtf? You missed all the point of that shit, that ALMOST FIFTY FUCKING PERCENT OF FOIDS SAID THEY WERE ATTRACTED TO OTHER FOIDS and 20% of them said they had sex.

Even foids can get foids much easier than yes, that's brutal af
I agree. The fact that foids would much rather do stuff with other foids even if the other foids were our looksmatch even if they are normally straight if we were their only option for them.
 
Jfl when the the other gender of your specie is more attracted to itself than to the other gender :feelspuke: what a fucked up world I think we should just genocide women and invent an alternative as clearly they aren't our complementary gender
@Tenshi just tagging you since your posts blackpilled me on the lesbianpill
 
JFL at foids hypocrisy, I bet they are this homophobic because they KNOW they themselves are all bisexual deep down and don't want their men lusting other men in secret as they often do even when they're in relationships with men. Foids are laughable easy to read through.

Lucky for them, most men are actually very straight and don't secretly lust good looking men as they do.

Jfl when the the other gender of your specie is more attracted to itself than to the other gender :feelspuke: what a fucked up world I think we should just genocide women and invent an alternative as clearly they aren't our complementary gender
@Tenshi just tagging you since your posts blackpilled me on the lesbianpill
ikr, that's what made me disgust the female gender (and actually the whole human species as well) to the extreme. The lesbianpill DESTROYED me.

It's sickening to just think about how fucked up this is. That's why I hate bisexual women and ABSOLUTELY despise and I'm grossed out by lesbians, I don't even know how some incels here can get excited by lesbian porn.
 
JFL at foids hypocrisy, I bet they are this homophobic because they KNOW they themselves are all bisexual deep down and don't want their men lusting other men in secret as they often do even when they're in relationships with men. Foids are laughable easy to read through.

Lucky for them, most men are actually very straight and don't secretly lust good looking men as they do.


ikr, that's what made me disgust the female gender (and actually the whole human species as well) to the extreme. The lesbianpill DESTROYED me.

It's sickening to just think about how fucked up this is. That's why I hate bisexual women and ABSOLUTELY despise and I'm grossed out by lesbians, I don't even know how some incels here can get excited by lesbian porn.
It’s because women are more conventionally attractive than men
 
It’s because women are more conventionally attractive than men
I used to think that was the major factor as well, but have you seen how low the bar is set for these women?

Next time you walk around pay attention to these lesbian "couples", you'll more than often see these women dating absolutely hideous girls which they themselves mog to death.

Some of these women will fuck foids that aren't conventially attractive but will reject men who are above average... :feelsclown:
 
Great stuff Kemper. I seen a Nick Fuentes video a while back that you would've liked which found similar results except it was about huge amounts of women having work husbands and admitting to having rape fantasies but YouTube shit the bed and chopped it. I think the work husbands was 60% and the rape fantasies was like 90% to some degree or another.

And he came to the conclusion that this is why so many religions control their women by saying something like "these religions are thousands of years old. Do they really all 'just hate women bro' or do they understand female nature?".
 
I used to think that was the major factor as well, but have you seen how low the bar is set for these women?

Next time you walk around pay attention to these lesbian "couples", you'll more than often see these women dating absolutely hideous girls which they themselves mog to death.

Some of these women will fuck foids that aren't conventially attractive but will reject men who are above average... :feelsclown:
Lesbian couples aren’t always like that. Many times they look different from that
 
Female bisexuality has always been more accepted than the male version, no surprise.
 
Female bisexuality has always been more accepted than the male version, no surprise.
Easy evolutionary explanations could be guessed as well. Let's say from an alpha male perspective, letting your women lick each other's pussies and suck boobas would be preferable in terms of preventing them from getting sexual release from competing, lower-status, sexually struggling men.
 
Easy evolutionary explanations could be guessed as well. Let's say from an alpha male perspective, letting your women lick each other's pussies and suck boobas would be preferable in terms of preventing them from getting sexual release from competing, lower-status, sexually struggling men.
Their lesbian behavior would also prevent them from getting pregnant from other males
 
Lesbian couples aren’t always like that. Many times they look different from that

Yet many of them are like that. How do we explain it? Just pure misandry?
 
What's a stereotype? The butch lesbian pairing? As opposed to lipstick lesbians? I doubt that.
Dude you have no evidence that all lesbians are butch other than anecdotes which isn’t evidence
 
Dude you have no evidence that all lesbians are butch other than anecdotes which isn’t evidence

First off, I never said 'all'.

Second off, nether do you.
 
I'd say 90% of dykes are butch, lipstick lesbians are very rare in comparison.

At the very least, 1 of the girls is a dyke and the other is Feminine.
 
I didn't create anything. Plenty of them are.
yes but many aren't.
I'd say 90% of dykes are butch, lipstick lesbians are very rare in comparison.

At the very least, 1 of the girls is a dyke and the other is Feminine.
you're just pulling statistics out of thin air based on biased stereotypes.
 
Where are your statistics then?
I’m sure many lesbians look normal. And women are more physically attractive than men. Straight women even more attracted to women than they’re to men. Even they find men less handsome than other straight men rate men . So lesbians being Butch or not doesn’t prove shit. Your point about lesbians being butch doesn’t mean anything either way. Show me research that most are butch or shut up

“In 2005, preliminary research conducted by Levitt and Bridges indicated that lesbians are more likely to identify as butch and have a more masculine gender expression than bisexual women. 4.5 percent of the bisexual women they studied identified as butch compared to the 30.1 percent of lesbians who did.”

so almost 70% are not even butch https://books.google.com/books?id=1pCKkZmBU1EC&pg=PA301#v=onepage&q&f=false
 
I’m sure many lesbians look normal.

I didn't ask what you were 'sure' of. Don't come back with this when you responded earlier about anecdotes being fallacious earlier.

And women are more physically attractive than men.

This is debatable by the very data your considered above. An alternative interpretation is that women are considered more attractive due to several factors discussed elsewhere in blackpill (women are wonderful effect, male desperation and tendency to find a greater percentage of females attractive, etc).

But this is completely irrelevant to what we're talking about.

Straight women even more attracted to women than they’re to men. Even they find men less handsome than other straight men rate men . So lesbians being Butch or not doesn’t prove shit.

Wait, what? What even is your logic here? Women are more likely to date other women than settle for men so...lesbians aren't butch? This doesn't even make sense.

Your point about lesbians being butch doesn’t mean anything either way.

I didn't make a 'point'. Work on your reading comprehension. I said I doubt that many lesbians are pairs of conventionally attractive/feminine women. To which you disagreed and said anecdotes are worthless (which they are). Then proceeded to use that exact same fallacy.

Show me research that most are butch or shut up

Exactly what I said. I never claimed I had fact on the topic. Go ahead and post where I stated I did. You stated I was incorrect, and I requested evidence. You didn't provide any. So at best we can agree to disagree.

“In 2005, preliminary research conducted by Levitt and Bridges indicated that lesbians are more likely to identify as butch and have a more masculine gender expression than bisexual women. 4.5 percent of the bisexual women they studied identified as butch compared to the 30.1 percent of lesbians who did.”

so almost 70% are not even butch https://books.google.com/books?id=1pCKkZmBU1EC&pg=PA301#v=onepage&q&f=false

Are you kidding me? Your very own research disproves whatever assertion you were trying to make. Did you not notice that? BTW this is what I stated, and I quote:

Yet many of them are like that. How do we explain it? Just pure misandry?

I didn't even state the majority of them were. I simply said 'many'. 34.6% is a minority (and that's assuming we should trust that all women were honest seeing as the study states 'they identified' lol) but that's far from a statistical anomaly.

You spent several posts not only misinterpreting me but then went out of your way to mistakenly prove me right. Wow.

But here's the thing - I don't give a shit about the numbers of butch lesbians or not. My original question was why the ones that are act that way in the first place. You went off on a retard tangent.
 
Last edited:
I didn't ask what you were 'sure' of. Don't come back with this when you responded earlier about anecdotes being fallacious earlier.



This is debatable by the very data your considered above. An alternative interpretation is that women are considered more attractive due to several factors discussed elsewhere in blackpill (women are wonderful effect, male desperation and tendency to find a greater percentage of females attractive, etc).

But this is completely irrelevant to what we're talking about.



Wait, what? What even is your logic here? Women are more likely to date other women than settle for men so...lesbians aren't butch? This doesn't even make sense.



I didn't make a 'point'. Work on your reading comprehension. I said I doubt that many lesbians are pairs of conventionally attractive/feminine women. To which you disagreed and said anecdotes are worthless (which they are). Then proceeded to use that exact same fallacy.



Exactly what I said. I never claimed I had fact on the topic. Go ahead and post where I stated I did. You stated I was incorrect, and I requested evidence. You didn't provide any. So at best we can agree to disagree.



Are you kidding me? Your very own research disproves whatever assertion you were trying to make. Did you not notice that? BTW this is what I stated, and I quote:



I didn't even state the majority of them were. I simply said 'many'. 34.6% is a minority (and that's assuming we should trust that all women were honest seeing as the study states 'they identified' lol) but that's far from a statistical anomaly.

You spent several posts not only misinterpreting me but then went out of your way to mistakenly prove me right. Wow.

But here's the thing - I don't give a shit about the numbers of butch lesbians or not. My original question was why the ones that are act that way in the first place. You went off on a retard tangent.
Most aren’t even butch. It’s not common. 30.1 (not 34.6) % is not common.

also, "women are considered more attractive due to several factors discussed elsewhere in blackpill (women are wonderful effect, male desperation and tendency to find a greater percentage of females attractive, etc).". this right here is merely hypothetical. and the women are wonderful effect doesn't affect sexuality because sexuality is innate. not to mention the women are wonderful effect is about how women are WONDERFUL NOT physically attractive. straight women literally get aroused physioligcally by other women, and chads probably find many women attractive. if they have high standards for women they like, it could be for other traits aside from her looks. you are making mere hypothesis and jumping straight to conclusion without testing it out. no, i don't think it has to do with men being desperate and finding any woman attraxtive or the women are wonderful effect. Only 2.9% of women are lesbians (so clearly the studies about women perceiving women as more good looking than men is valid and especially when most straight women 72% are just as if not more aroused by other women than by men) and half of butch lesbians find feminine women more attractive and only a quarter find butch like them most attractive, so this idea that all lesbian couples are two ugly masculine women is false. Most lesbians aren't butch.
 
Your inability (or refusal) to read the actual points I am making is beyond frustrating. This is going to be my final post to you, because I suspect outside of interpreting statistics your comprehension skills are dire (and even those are questionable).

Most aren’t even butch.

For the last fucking time, no-one ever said 'most'. If you're going to debate, at least respond to the actual comments people make. As opposed to the strawmen you erect. If you are not being dishonest, it comes off as seriously low IQ.

It’s not common. 30.1 (not 34.6) % is not common.

No, it isn't common. No-one said that.

My posts are in plain text, which you can literally quote and still you continue to pull this shit out of your ass. I am very particular with my words.

I combined the two figures from 'bi-sexual women' and 'lesbians' from the study. That is 34.6 and not just 30.1. But this is quibble. Either way, a 30% is a significant figure of a population. It doens't have to be 'common', it still counts as a noticeable statistic and would make my comments above technically correct. As someone that has experience with graphs, statistics and figures you should know this. 30% is something you sit up and take notice of. Something being a minority in a data set does not make it unimportant.

also, "women are considered more attractive due to several factors discussed elsewhere in blackpill (women are wonderful effect, male desperation and tendency to find a greater percentage of females attractive, etc).". this right here is merely hypothetical. and the women are wonderful effect doesn't affect sexuality because sexuality is innate. not to mention the women are wonderful effect is about how women are WONDERFUL NOT physically attractive. straight women literally get aroused physioligcally by other women, and chads probably find many women attractive. if they have high standards for women they like, it could be for other traits aside from her looks. you are making mere hypothesis and jumping straight to conclusion without testing it out.

You are a total dipshit, extreme aspie or disingenuous. Perhaps all three.

No shit, its a hypothesis/theory. I literally said it was debatable. Thus indicating I had not reached a conclusion and that I was pondering on what might be the case. Unlike you, I am intellectually honest enough to put forth thought experiments while admitting I am fallible.


no, i don't think it has to do with men being desperate and finding any woman attraxtive or the women are wonderful effect. Only 2.9% of women are lesbians (so clearly the studies about women perceiving women as more good looking than men is valid

No it is not 'clear', you idiot. Again, you accuse me of baseless assertions and then immediately go on to do it yourself. Its worse because you don't frame it as your opinion (which it clearly is) but attempt to pass it off as something supported by the data (it is not) so it can be regarded as objective. Let me remind you again the study clearly states, 'what women identify as' which is troublesome enough on its own before we even take into account women are prone to lying (such as saying they are lesbians until they find a guy they want to fuck). You are not using the blackpill here.

and especially when most straight women 72% are just as if not more aroused by other women than by men) and half of butch lesbians find feminine women more attractive and only a quarter find butch like them most attractive,

Irrelevant.

so this idea that all lesbian couples are two ugly masculine women is false.

Yet again, never said 'all', you lying fuck.

Most lesbians aren't butch.

You've still not proven that; not like I give a fuck. I already mentioned I don't give a shit about the actual numbers so much as why the ones that are with butch are inclined to be in those relationships. Something which you completely ignored. You have an astounding ability to misinterpret simple responses and fail to answer the most straightforward of questions. I have to repeat myself more than I would with a child. Welcome to my blocklist.
 
Last edited:
Jfl when the the other gender of your specie is more attracted to itself than to the other gender :feelspuke: what a fucked up world I think we should just genocide women and invent an alternative as clearly they aren't our complementary gender
@Tenshi just tagging you since your posts blackpilled me on the lesbianpill
 
Your inability (or refusal) to read the actual points I am making is beyond frustrating. This is going to be my final post to you, because I suspect outside of interpreting statistics your comprehension skills are dire (and even those are questionable).



For the last fucking time, no-one ever said 'most'. If you're going to debate, at least respond to the actual comments people make. As opposed to the strawmen you erect. If you are not being dishonest, it comes off as seriously low IQ.



No, it isn't common. No-one said that.

My posts are in plain text, which you can literally quote and still you continue to pull this shit out of your ass. I am very particular with my words.

I combined the two figures from 'bi-sexual women' and 'lesbians' from the study. That is 34.6 and not just 30.1. But this is quibble. Either way, a 30% is a significant figure of a population. It doens't have to be 'common', it still counts as a noticeable statistic and would make my comments above technically correct. As someone that has experience with graphs, statistics and figures you should know this. 30% is something you sit up and take notice of. Something being a minority in a data set does not make it unimportant.



You are a total dipshit, extreme aspie or disingenuous. Perhaps all three.

No shit, its a hypothesis/theory. I literally said it was debatable. Thus indicating I had not reached a conclusion and that I was pondering on what might be the case. Unlike you, I am intellectually honest enough to put forth thought experiments while admitting I am fallible.




No it is not 'clear', you idiot. Again, you accuse me of baseless assertions and then immediately go on to do it yourself. Its worse because you don't frame it as your opinion (which it clearly is) but attempt to pass it off as something supported by the data (it is not) so it can be regarded as objective. Let me remind you again the study clearly states, 'what women identify as' which is troublesome enough on its own before we even take into account women are prone to lying (such as saying they are lesbians until they find a guy they want to fuck). You are not using the blackpill here.



Irrelevant.



Yet again, never said 'all', you lying fuck.



You've still not proven that; not like I give a fuck. I already mentioned I don't give a shit about the actual numbers so much as why the ones that are with butch are inclined to be in those relationships. Something which you completely ignored. You have an astounding ability to misinterpret simple responses and fail to answer the most straightforward of questions. I have to repeat myself more than I would with a child. Welcome to my blocklist.
Dude you initially said lesbians are typically butch and that it’s the norm and what is generally true. 30% isn’t typical. That’s a minority. 70% is typical. You moved the goalposts.
 
Easy evolutionary explanations could be guessed as well. Let's say from an alpha male perspective, letting your women lick each other's pussies and suck boobas would be preferable in terms of preventing them from getting sexual release from competing, lower-status, sexually struggling men.
This is pretty much my thoughts when I watch lesbian porn. More specifically, I think of them being "Primed" for me.:ahegao:
 
Where was this study done? who were the subjects? The results are worthless if they only come from a bunch of graduate students. All it does it reveal the very real hypocrisies of the future liberal elite.
It wasn’t grad students
 

Similar threads

AloneCel2
Replies
26
Views
782
sociology blackpill
sociology blackpill
ElliotMogger
Replies
13
Views
610
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0
Spooky_Heejin
Replies
27
Views
802
Spooky_Heejin
Spooky_Heejin
Balding Subhuman
Replies
6
Views
268
lifeisbullshit95
lifeisbullshit95
L
Replies
2
Views
109
go2sleep
go2sleep

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top