Blackpill [Study] [Juicy] Study finds foid scientists turn out to be shit without male guidance in their careers

[Babica Yaga]

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance

Here, the authors study mentorship in scientific collaborations, and find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of protégés post mentorship. Moreover, female protégés collaborating with male mentors become more impactful post mentorship than those who collaborate with female...

www.nature.com

Published in Nature Communications

Abstract
We study mentorship in scientific collaborations, where a junior scientist is supported by potentially multiple senior collaborators, without them necessarily having formal supervisory roles. We identify 3 million mentor–protégé pairs and survey a random sample, verifying that their relationship involved some form of mentorship. We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors. We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors. While current diversity policies encourage same-gender mentorships to retain women in academia, our findings raise the possibility that opposite-gender mentorship may actually increase the impact of women who pursue a scientific career. These findings add a new perspective to the policy debate on how to best elevate the status of women in science.

---
TLDR:

We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors.

We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors.

In other words:

Foids NEED to have male mentors if they want to succeed and have an impactful scientific career after their mentorships.

Look at the reactions it's been receiving and the soy SJW lefty foid professors and PhD's responding on Twitter LMFAO


View: https://twitter.com/CarolynBertozzi/status/1329100008918978567


View: https://twitter.com/skepchicks/status/1329172344460500992


View: https://twitter.com/niknikkums/status/1329145648717959171



"GarBaGe aLErT. HOW DARE YOU SAY WAHMEN CAN'T BE GOOD MENTORS LIKE MEN!! YOU FILTHY MISOGYNISTIC, PRIVILEGED, STOOPID WHITE MALES!!"

The paper was btw written by 3 sandniggers JFL. Gigabased.

 

[Irredeemable]

More evidence that women are garbage.

 

[mNFwTJ3wz9]

MORE THAN 100% BASED
FUCK FOIDS
PERIMETER OF A FRACTAL IQ PAPER

 

[Mulattocel]

Not surprising

 

[Babica Yaga]

More evidence that women are garbage.

It would be better for society if they just went back to the kitchen and fulfilled their traditional roles, because as evidenced again they literally suck at everything.

 

[SuccessfulShark]

I hate feminism

 

[Tenshi]

More evidence that women are garbage.

It would be better for society if they just went back to the kitchen and fulfilled their traditional roles, because as evidenced again they literally suck at everything.

but this time we should apply eugenics to them so they won't turn into whores for good, hypergamy must be wiped out of the species

 

[Babica Yaga]

but this time we should apply eugenics to them so they won't turn into whores for good, hypergamy must be wiped out of the species

Wipe out cucks like these as well while we're at it

View: https://twitter.com/millerjm86/status/1328765642372042753

"oK aLL, thIs NeW papER In @NatURecOmms ReALLy Has ME Sad/COnfusEd/aNGRy"

 

[slavcel11]

The only appropriate place for foids in academia is under the desk.

 

[horseshoe]

Foids and soys seething at a paper published in the most prestigious journal on the planet. Brilliant.

The only appropriate place for foids in academia is under the desk.

 

[Lookscel]

Nature Communications

Isn't that a highly reputed journal?

 

[LittleDarkAge]

Foids are incapable of thinking for themselves, they always need someone to hold their hand

 

[Lookscel]

View: https://twitter.com/niknikkums/status/1329145648717959171

Nicolette here get's it

 

[Babica Yaga]

The only appropriate place for foids in academia is under the desk.

Based

Nicolette here get's it

Only high iq post by a foid on that thread

Isn't that a highly reputed journal?

Yes Nature is the most prestigious scientific journal, though Nature Communications is technically a "mega-journal" ie like a sub journal of Nature but still has high impact factor (articles in it are often cited by other researchers)

 

[Robloxcel]

This is a classic example of how if the scientific results of research don’t fit the sjw agenda they will just claim they are false with absolutely no evidence. What they want to believe (that women are equal or superior to men at literally everything) MUST be true and any facts disputing that must be false.

 

[Simulacrasimulation]

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance

Here, the authors study mentorship in scientific collaborations, and find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of protégés post mentorship. Moreover, female protégés collaborating with male mentors become more impactful post mentorship than those who collaborate with female...

www.nature.com

Published in Nature Communications

Abstract
We study mentorship in scientific collaborations, where a junior scientist is supported by potentially multiple senior collaborators, without them necessarily having formal supervisory roles. We identify 3 million mentor–protégé pairs and survey a random sample, verifying that their relationship involved some form of mentorship. We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors. We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors. While current diversity policies encourage same-gender mentorships to retain women in academia, our findings raise the possibility that opposite-gender mentorship may actually increase the impact of women who pursue a scientific career. These findings add a new perspective to the policy debate on how to best elevate the status of women in science.

---
TLDR:

We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors.

We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors.

In other words:

Foids NEED to have male mentors if they want to succeed and have an impactful scientific career after their mentorships.

Look at the reactions it's been receiving and the soy SJW lefty foid professors and PhD's responding on Twitter LMFAO


View: https://twitter.com/CarolynBertozzi/status/1329100008918978567


View: https://twitter.com/skepchicks/status/1329172344460500992


View: https://twitter.com/niknikkums/status/1329145648717959171



"GarBaGe aLErT. HOW DARE YOU SAY WAHMEN CAN'T BE GOOD MENTORS LIKE MEN!! YOU FILTHY MISOGYNISTIC, PRIVILEGED, STOOPID WHITE MALES!!"

The paper was btw written by 3 sandniggers JFL. Gigabased.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpB83chNBQc

 

[ReallyRice]

No wonder single mom households are shitshows

 

[Trump2020]

Women cannot be scientists because they think with emotions and not with logic, and also are completely oblivious to everything that is not themselves and Chad.

If society was only made up by women they would still be in the stoneage.

 

[Amphetaminecel]

Nicolette here get's it

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/neuronalnerd/status/1329273722147131392


And look at that retarded, out of place answer JFL

 

[Babica Yaga]

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/neuronalnerd/status/1329273722147131392


And look at that retarded, out of place answer JFL

Lol I noticed these people are starting to include their pronouns in their twitter bios "he/him"

It's over...

This is a classic example of how if the scientific results of research don’t fit the sjw agenda they will just claim they are false with absolutely no evidence. What they want to believe (that women are equal or superior to men at literally everything) MUST be true and any facts disputing that must be false.

Absolutely

 

[Simulacrasimulation]

Women cannot be scientists because they think with emotions and not with logic, and also are completely oblivious to everything that is not themselves and Chad.

If society was only made up by women they would still be in the stoneage.

almost too based

 

[The Zulfigar]

Good morning women are low iq

Women cannot be scientists because they think with emotions and not with logic, and also are completely oblivious to everything that is not themselves and Chad.

If society was only made up by women they would be dead.

 

[osman27]

The paper was btw written by 3 sandniggers JFL. Gigabased.
[/QUOTE]

From searching on twitter, it seems these triggered soys were smart enough not say anything about that. Report written in Abu dhabi........ Based since I'm still in the city for the next few weeks.

 

[Babica Yaga]

Quick update: The paper has been retracted.

Editor’s Note: Readers are alerted that this paper is subject to criticisms that are being considered by the editors. Those criticisms were targeted to the authors’ interpretation of their data that gender plays a role in the success of mentoring relationships between junior and senior researchers, in a way that undermines the role of female mentors and mentees. We are investigating the concerns raised and an editorial response will follow the resolution of these issues.

Just felt the need to address this as it shows ((they)) will go as far as to censor scientific knowledge if it doesn't align with their belief systems. Truly saddening.

 

[dirtykombatcel]

MORE THAN 100% BASED
FUCK FOIDS
PERIMETER OF A FRACTAL IQ PAPER

 

[nazianime]

Quick update: The paper has been retracted.


Just felt the need to address this as it shows ((they)) will go as far as to censor scientific knowledge if it doesn't align with their belief systems. Truly saddening.

JFL, "I LoVE sCieNce"
Yet when the paper shows women are incompetent at mentoring. "ThIS SiEnTIfic PaPer is my sogy kneeee"

 

[Ika-Sama]

This is a classic example of how if the scientific results of research don’t fit the sjw agenda they will just claim they are false with absolutely no evidence. What they want to believe (that women are equal or superior to men at literally everything) MUST be true and any facts disputing that must be false.