Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Struggling normies (or chadlites) are not our allies

nvrbegan

nvrbegan

Major
★★
Joined
Jan 5, 2024
Posts
2,138
If they struggle, you sometimes read sentences from semi-"blackpilled" people like "Yeah, expectations on dating apps, are unreasonable, a solid guy like you should do better" or "You're such a handsome man, society really decays, huh?".

And this implies that you deserve to struggle if you're below average. That they think that pussy should be a privilege for the top 50% (rather than the top 5%).
Discriminating against hoodrats is not ok (even though it makes sense given their crime statistics) but discrimating for looks is ok AS LONG AS IT DOES NOT GET TOO EXTREME (read: not more than 50% of men should be seen as subhumans because 90% is too much)?

Struggling normies are still lookist. They think you don't deserve love because you're an uggo.
They think they deserve love because they're average.
They want to reduce foids standards so much that they can get a gf, but not so much that you'll get one.
They still think women should have choices. They still think women should be able to reject subhuman truecels because it would be a harsh fate for a foid to live with a person like you, their heart bleeds at the thought of forcing a disgusted foid to live with a truecel.

"A woman should have reasonable standards" means Normie+Chad only, everyone else is biotrash.
Because it's "reasonable" to be a lookist against truecels.
IF THIS IS REASONABLE, why isn't it then reasonable to discriminate against hoodrats?

FUCK your reasonableness!
Either each and every man gets his looksmatch or I'm fine with 0.01% hyper turbo thunderchad ONLY and FUCK YOU, normoid sub 9.99/10 scum!
 
Last edited:
They will either ghost u or stab in back if the narrative suits them
 
OP is right. And the struggling normies would be us if a little shorter, etc. Also, people don't care about our problems because they don't think it's wrong to harm us. Only short men and incels are not allowed boundaries.
 
If they struggle, you sometimes read sentences from semi-"blackpilled" people like "Yeah, expectations on dating apps, are unreasonable, a solid guy like you should do better" or "You're such a handsome man, society really decays, huh?".

And this implies that you deserve to struggle if you're below average. That they think that pussy should be a privilege for the top 50% (rather than the top 5%).
Discriminating against hoodrats is not ok (even though it makes sense given their crime statistics) but discrimating for looks is ok AS LONG AS IT DOES NOT GET TOO EXTREME (read: not more than 50% of men should be seen as subhumans because 90% is too much)?

Struggling normies are still lookist. They think you don't deserve love because you're an uggo.
They think they deserve love because they're average.
They want to reduce foids standards so much that they can get a gf, but not so much that you'll get one.
They still think women should have choices. They still think women should be able to reject subhuman truecels because it would be a harsh fate for a foid to live with a person like you, their heart bleeds at the thought of forcing a disgusted foid to live with a truecel.

"A woman should have reasonable standards" means Normie+Chad only, everyone else is biotrash.
Because it's "reasonable" to be a lookist against truecels.
IF THIS IS REASONABLE, why isn't it then reasonable to discriminate against hoodrats?

FUCK your reasonableness!
Either each and every man gets his looksmatch or I'm fine with 0.01% hyper turbo thunderchad ONLY and FUCK YOU, normoid sub 9.99/10 scum!
We need state assigned wives
 
If they struggle, you sometimes read sentences from semi-"blackpilled" people like "Yeah, expectations on dating apps, are unreasonable, a solid guy like you should do better" or "You're such a handsome man, society really decays, huh?".

And this implies that you deserve to struggle if you're below average. That they think that pussy should be a privilege for the top 50% (rather than the top 5%).
Discriminating against hoodrats is not ok (even though it makes sense given their crime statistics) but discrimating for looks is ok AS LONG AS IT DOES NOT GET TOO EXTREME (read: not more than 50% of men should be seen as subhumans because 90% is too much)?

Struggling normies are still lookist. They think you don't deserve love because you're an uggo.
They think they deserve love because they're average.
They want to reduce foids standards so much that they can get a gf, but not so much that you'll get one.
They still think women should have choices. They still think women should be able to reject subhuman truecels because it would be a harsh fate for a foid to live with a person like you, their heart bleeds at the thought of forcing a disgusted foid to live with a truecel.

"A woman should have reasonable standards" means Normie+Chad only, everyone else is biotrash.
Because it's "reasonable" to be a lookist against truecels.
IF THIS IS REASONABLE, why isn't it then reasonable to discriminate against hoodrats?

FUCK your reasonableness!
Either each and every man gets his looksmatch or I'm fine with 0.01% hyper turbo thunderchad ONLY and FUCK YOU, normoid sub 9.99/10 scum!
Screw Normie fucking most of them make me very angry they aren’t my ally most bullshit I experience is from struggling Normie not even Chad mogger
 

Similar threads

RealSchizo
Replies
14
Views
518
UglyDumbass
U
Stupid Clown
Replies
24
Views
1K
Minamoto
Minamoto
RealSchizo
Replies
23
Views
974
autisticmanchild
A

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top