Blackpill Statutory rape laws used to only punish men with underage girls, women fucking underage guys was legal until the end of the 20th century.

[Edmund_Kemper]

Originally, statutory rape was solely a male perpetrator-female victim dynamic by laws. Second wave feminists in the 1970s wanted to change how statutory rape laws worked. They wanted to make it only a felony if the perpetrator is a certain number of years older than the minor and they wanted statutory rape laws to be gender neutral, where male victims and female perpetrators were acknowledged by law. They wanted to make gender neutral laws, rape shield laws so the victim's sexual history was not brought up on trial, grading offenses by severity, and broadening offenses to acts outside penile-vaginal penetration, including other penetration, touching or oral activity (the last being particularly important when it comes to sexual assault of very young children). Feminists also wanted to eliminate the mistake-of-age defense where a man thought an underage girl was over the age of consent (even though that could happen). The drive for gender neutral language in statutory rape laws was successful in all states by 2000.

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Me_Too_Feminist_Theory_and_Surviving_Sex/1pPTDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=women+boys+statutory+rape+"gender+neutral"+"feminists"&pg=PA101&printsec=frontcover

Prosecuting Mrs. Robinson? Gender, Sexuality, and Statutory Rape Laws

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

hello?

 

[Emba]

Rapes me

 

[avoidthefoid]

statutory rape is such a dumb term.

rape=having sex by force with someone

if the girl agrees, regardless of her age, where the rape here? lol @ normie soyciety

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

statutory rape is such a dumb term.

rape=having sex by force with someone

if the girl agrees, regardless of her age, where the rape here? lol @ normie soyciety

her consent isn't seen as valid by law, hence statutory rape

i won't be surprised if feminists start calling the phrase "statutory rape" offensive in the future because they think it implies it's only rape by law or something. and i swear they're gonna try raising the age of consent to 21 in the next 10 years.

 

[avoidthefoid]

her consent isn't seen as valid by law, hence statutory rape

i won't be surprised if feminists start calling the phrase "statutory rape" offensive in the future because they think it implies it's only rape by law or something. and i swear they're gonna try raising the age of consent to 21 in the next 10 years.

yeah I get the concept. I just think it's dumb

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

@Robtical thoughts on this? I'm not surprised. In fact, i read statutory rape laws were originally lower in terms of age of consent and were created to protect a girl's chastity. People didn't care about a man losing his virginity before marriage and he fucked escorts all the time back then, and a woman deflowering him was seen as initiating him into a rite of passage of manhood.

 

[Indari]

life sucks

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

@Hoodedn1inja20

 

[1337hikki]

her consent isn't seen as valid by law, hence statutory rape

i won't be surprised if feminists start calling the phrase "statutory rape" offensive in the future because they think it implies it's only rape by law or something. and i swear they're gonna try raising the age of consent to 21 in the next 10 years.

rape is an inflammatory term and since no rape acc occurs in "statutory rape" it's bullshit. The reason is that only foids cry about having their butt touched, men don't give a shit it's just a little weird

 

[Robtical]

Originally, statutory rape was solely a male perpetrator-female victim dynamic by laws. Second wave feminists in the 1970s wanted to change how statutory rape laws worked. They wanted to make it only a felony if the perpetrator is a certain number of years older than the minor and they wanted statutory rape laws to be gender neutral, where male victims and female perpetrators were acknowledged by law. They wanted to make gender neutral laws, rape shield laws so the victim's sexual history was not brought up on trial, grading offenses by severity, and broadening offenses to acts outside penile-vaginal penetration, including other penetration, touching or oral activity (the last being particularly important when it comes to sexual assault of very young children). Feminists also wanted to eliminate the mistake-of-age defense where a man thought an underage girl was over the age of consent (even though that could happen). The drive for gender neutral language in statutory rape laws was successful in all states by 2000.

The feminists wanted to make it a felony and include kissing and touching because they knew it would continue to only effect men. Making it "gender neutral" did almost nothing to punish foids for statuary rape, but they were able to increase the offenses for men.

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

The feminists wanted to make it a felony and include kissing and touching because they knew it would continue to only effect men. Making it "gender neutral" did almost nothing to punish foids for statuary rape, but they were able to increase the offenses for men.

Female sex offenders also get more lenient sentences

 

[BlackPilledOverdose]

Agecuckoldry is feminism. This is just more proof.

"Statutory rape" Is a dumb feminist term also.

"Rape" Means to force someone to have sex with you against there consent.

If a teen foid consents to sex and is comfortable with it then how is that "Rape"?

Feminists are also passing insane new rape laws in countries.

Denmark strengthens rape laws, outlawing sex without explicit consent

Justice minister says: ‘Now it will be clear, that if both parties do no consent to sex, then it’s rape’

www.theguardian.com

Sweden plans change in law to require explicit consent before sexual contact

Under proposed legislation rape could be proved if accuser had not given verbal agreement or clearly demonstrated desire to engage in sexual activity

www.theguardian.com

Spanish parliament approves ‘only yes means yes’ consent bill

Sexual assault survivors will no longer have to prove violence was used against them if passed by Senate

www.theguardian.com

 

[Glerforpus]

I hate feminists so god damn much

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

I hate feminists so god damn much

Many did try to make the law gender neutral

The rare good thing they did

 

[Robtical]

Agecuckoldry is feminism. This is just more proof.

"Statutory rape" Is a dumb feminist term also.

"Rape" Means to force someone to have sex with you against there consent.

If a teen foid consents to sex and is comfortable with it then how is that "Rape"?

Feminists are also passing insane new rape laws in countries.

Denmark strengthens rape laws, outlawing sex without explicit consent

Justice minister says: ‘Now it will be clear, that if both parties do no consent to sex, then it’s rape’

www.theguardian.com

Sweden plans change in law to require explicit consent before sexual contact

Under proposed legislation rape could be proved if accuser had not given verbal agreement or clearly demonstrated desire to engage in sexual activity

www.theguardian.com

Spanish parliament approves ‘only yes means yes’ consent bill

Sexual assault survivors will no longer have to prove violence was used against them if passed by Senate

www.theguardian.com

They focus on these laws becuase they're the easiest for foids to get men in trouble with, and they want to make those type of laws so cucked that foids can get men jailed for rape with no evidence besides an accusation. With "yes means yes" any roaster can say a man fucked her without her saying yes first, and get him jailed for rape. They know foids won't be effected by these laws, so they don't mind making them as cucked as possible.

Many did try to make the law gender neutral

The rare good thing they did

They did that to not seem like hypocrits when they wanted to make it a felony and increase the definition of rape and sexual assault. They knew almost no foids will be effected by those laws, and if they are on rare occasions then cucked judges won't actually treat foids neutrally as men and give them the same long sentences.

 

[BlackPilledOverdose]

They focus on these laws becuase they're the easiest for foids to get men in trouble with, and they want to make those type of laws so cucked that foids can get men jailed for rape with no evidence besides an accusation. With "yes means yes" any roaster can say a man fucked her without her saying yes first, and get him jailed for rape. They know foids won't be effected by these laws, so they don't mind making them as cucked as possible.

We truly live in a gynocracy.

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

@Valiant Virgin

 

[turbo_coper]

"Muh toilets are pure and men bad!!!1!!"