D
These fuckers did another hit piece on us with not proof.
https://www.racked.com/2018/8/6/17616870/incels-looksmax
https://www.racked.com/2018/8/6/17616870/incels-looksmax
This article is so fucking awful I can't believe it. The author's premise is that incel "science" is flawed, yet provides ONE moot argument that they're incorrect? Seriously?
Does it not come to the author that there's a class of men getting 50 to 60% of all sexual relations?
Does it not come to the author that there's a class of men getting 50 to 60% of all sexual relations?
D
Lies. Lies and damn statistics. Casuistry. Sophistry and negating our own lived experiences.
Go figure. Negating the very obvious. Very obnoxious and they're desperate in denying their own looks preferred favouritism.
Go figure. Negating the very obvious. Very obnoxious and they're desperate in denying their own looks preferred favouritism.
I
Where's the "flawed science"
The data collection doesnt account for the fact that men are more likely to lie and inflate their partner count while foids are more likely to lie about partnercounts so they arent percieved as sluts
The data collection doesnt account for the fact that men are more likely to lie and inflate their partner count while foids are more likely to lie about partnercounts so they arent percieved as sluts
R
First comment:
"Long ago, someone told me that men "fall in love" with their eyes, but women "fall in love" with their ears. I have a feeling that if these incels developed a reasonable personality, they’d have no trouble getting women."
Fuck these bluepilled faggots and this gay earth
"Long ago, someone told me that men "fall in love" with their eyes, but women "fall in love" with their ears. I have a feeling that if these incels developed a reasonable personality, they’d have no trouble getting women."
Fuck these bluepilled faggots and this gay earth
(((statistician)))
I
JFL they also admit the best they can do is 'poke holes' in blackpill AKA finding outliers
D
That it? Can't deny though.
A
JFL when they even didn't include DICKCELS
I can't read it. I'm done. These people are psychopaths and their lack of self awareness isn't even realistic. I believe most people are AI torture bots.
"Treat women as human beings" my ass. Chads fuck, abuse, and dump foids yet still drowning in pussy
'Lived experiences' are completely irrelevant to hard science, tho.
Let's stay on an actual scientific path here, it still won't make our points invalid. I'm pretty sure our hypothesis holds true even under rigorous scientific standards. (See the big thread with actual scientific papers posted here: https://incels.is/threads/blackpill-archive.61693/)
I
Sure Chad treats women with kindness and respect and that's why he is knee deep in pussy..it's never about his good looks.
The article makes no sense, complete trash!
The article makes no sense, complete trash!
Daily reminder: Anytime anyone attempts to say we're wrong, stick this chart in front of this and tell them to explain.
The 20 - 80 rule is made up by copers to make themselves feel less subhuman. The majority of men ARE getting sex and relationships. Only a small proportion of men are incels. +- 5%, the true subhumans, the bottom 5% on the bell curve. In order to be incel you really have to be sub 5th percentile in multiple aspects, be it height, face, frame, social skills, etc. And this is exactly the situation we are in.
That being said, ethnics are a special case. Even if you are not in the bottom 5% for your ethnicity, if you live in a country where the natives mog your race, then you could still be incel. So many ethnics that are technically not subhuman, are incel due to location. And I think if we surveyed this forum we would find out that a very large proportion of users are ethnic.
That being said, ethnics are a special case. Even if you are not in the bottom 5% for your ethnicity, if you live in a country where the natives mog your race, then you could still be incel. So many ethnics that are technically not subhuman, are incel due to location. And I think if we surveyed this forum we would find out that a very large proportion of users are ethnic.
D
I always hated when they say that vague shit. That just gets us friendzoned
when will these faggots stop pretending that men are more shallow than women?
If you count people who had sex one time with a landwhale or a drunk cousin or once every year or had one girlfriend in all their life thanks to a strike of luck - and that cheated on them two months afterwards -, yeah the 20-80 rules doesn't work, but if you count people who regularely have sex and girlfriends, the 20-80 rules hold perfectly.
This "flawed science" helped me gain 2 points with one surgery.
M
This is true. Lots of normies, after first adult years understanding there's not someone for everyone marry the first woman who will accept them - or they become incels. Lots of other sub chads or worse get sex now and again - once a year maybe - or in worse cases hold down a poor relationship for 6 months - then go 3-4 years with nothing - blunder into another poor relationship with a 4/10 and so on. So the stats really dont reveal the true picture. Only the top 5% of guys live proper lives.
D
To be honest. All these articles do are give us publicity and spread our messages. These statistics can't do sweet FA.
This normalfag cope argument needs to be applied elsewhere
>So what if we have income inequality? This graph shows most poor people have worked a job at least once. I don't see a problem
>So what if we have income inequality? This graph shows most poor people have worked a job at least once. I don't see a problem
>wrist enlargements
D-do... do people actually do this?
D-do... do people actually do this?
D
Bullseye.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
