Toxic Femininity Stating statistics and human biology will make you lose your job and an "extremist with warped views"

[Deleted member 20195]

How ridiculous is it that stating Human biology is now something that can make you lose your job but only when mentioning female biology.
Whenever a female goes on social media to state "men are pigs" does she lose her job for misandry? no she gets sympathy from fellow females. Yes guys will fuck as many females as they can given the chance and will fuck the most attractive females they can get given the chance. This is biologically hardwired in most men so they can spread their genes.

Now females will fuck only the most attractive males that show interest, this is hardwired to ensure she only has the best genes for her offspring. A close second for females is to get fucked by someone with alot of resources(money) so her offspring and herself have an easy life. If you mention this biological fact instead of saying females want "personality" and happen to be male online, you are a misogynist, will lose your job, be blacklisted and a social pariah.

We truly live in Orwelian times.

 

[Therapywasaaste]

People don't like hearing the truth

 

[Ellviss]

People don't like hearing the truth

 

[VindalooCell]

View: https://twitter.com/IAmGryphoneer/status/1337816460689813504

 

[mNFwTJ3wz9]

View: https://twitter.com/IAmGryphoneer/status/1337816460689813504

Based

 

[VindalooCell]

Based

It's funny because the 13/52 meme has penetrated soyciety so much that whenever that phrasing is used, people think of the crime statistic.

 

[Unsaveable]

View: https://twitter.com/IAmGryphoneer/status/1337816460689813504

>Tachanka



What's with trannies and sjw types larping with soviet names? do they not realise they would've been sent to Gulags?

 

[mNFwTJ3wz9]

It's funny because the 13/52 meme has penetrated soyciety so much that whenever that phrasing is used, people think of the crime statistic.

Also there are some based memes in that thread

 

[VindalooCell]

>Tachanka



What's with trannies and sjw types larping with soviet names? do they not realise they would've been sent to Gulags?

It's a furry, and Tachanka is a character from Rainbow Six Siege

https://rainbowsix.fandom.com/wiki/Tachanka

In regards to the SJW stuff, many of them support Leninism and Trotskyism, and seem to think this sort of stuff was only stigmatised under Stalin.

Also there are some based memes in that thread
View attachment 383831
View attachment 383832
View attachment 383833
View attachment 383834
View attachment 383835

First meme is very good.

 

[BlkPillPres]

How ridiculous is it that stating Human biology is now something that can make you lose your job but only when mentioning female biology.
Whenever a female goes on social media to state "men are pigs" does she lose her job for misandry? no she gets sympathy from fellow females. Yes guys will fuck as many females as they can given the chance and will fuck the most attractive females they can get given the chance. This is biologically hardwired in most men so they can spread their genes.

Now females will fuck only the most attractive males that show interest, this is hardwired to ensure she only has the best genes for her offspring. A close second for females is to get fucked by someone with alot of resources(money) so her offspring and herself have an easy life. If you mention this biological fact instead of saying females want "personality" and happen to be male online, you are a misogynist, will lose your job, be blacklisted and a social pariah.

We truly live in Orwelian times.

True, we do live in Orwelian times, but when it comes to things like this I always tend to ask "what do you even get out of saying these things?"

This is just one of those situations where I'd be the "victim blamer", people have to be self aware, aware of the times they live in. In the same way that I'd ask a female rape victim - "why did you walk down a dark alleyway at night?", I'd ask any of these individuals who end up fucking their lives up - "why would you publicly post something like that under your real name?"

I wouldn't even call this a risk vs reward thing because there is no reward to publicly saying what nobody wants to hear (patting yourself on the back is not a reward lol)

Unless that person is going to take it seriously, go on a national platform, understand that they will lose friends and family, have funds set aside for the loss of their job, etc, then they'd just be wasting their time and risking their life making such public remarks (all for clout)

I could never see myself making those kinds of twitter posts or saying that shit at work (though I already do say some near black pill shit at work like I'd never get married because I plan on being rich and divorce stats aren't good these days)

TBH "publicly venting" makes no sense to me, it seems like a cope to try and "get back at society" or "tell people off", but its like the cowards way of doing it as you are hoping there are no consequences, its like some kind of weird half assed "taking a stand", you are only speaking like that because posting about something "online" makes you feel disconnected from the reality of it, yet you are posting it with your real name publicly so you get to tell yourself you are being open and honest and "standing for your beliefs"

All society has done is force these people to act as if they were in a room surrounded by people, and reminded people that you should feel very much connected, your online profile is just that, a profile not a persona. If you want a persona use a fake username or an anonymous forum (like this place)

IF YOU WON'T SAY SOMETHING IN A ROOM FULL OF PEOPLE, YOU PROBABLY SHOULDN'T POST IT IN A PUBLIC FORUM WITH AN ACCOUNT USING YOUR REAL NAME

 

[Deleted member 20195]

True, we do live in Orwelian times, but when it comes to things like this I always tend to ask "what do you even get out of saying these things?"

This is just one of those situations where I'd be the "victim blamer", people have to be self aware, aware of the times they live in. In the same way that I'd ask a female rape victim - "why did you walk down a dark alleyway at night?", I'd ask any of these individuals who end up fucking their lives up - "why would you publicly post something like that under your real name?"

I wouldn't even call this a risk vs reward thing because there is no reward to publicly saying what nobody wants to hear (patting yourself on the back is not a reward lol)

Unless that person is going to take it seriously, go on a national platform, understand that they will lose friends and family, have funds set aside for the loss of their job, etc, then they'd just be wasting their time and risking their life making such public remarks (all for clout)

I could never see myself making those kinds of twitter posts or saying that shit at work (though I already do say some near black pill shit at work like I'd never get married because I plan on being rich and divorce stats aren't good these days)

TBH "publicly venting" makes no sense to me, it seems like a cope to try and "get back at society" or "tell people off", but its like the cowards way of doing it as you are hoping there are no consequences, its like some kind of weird half assed "taking a stand", you are only speaking like that because posting about something "online" makes you feel disconnected from the reality of it, yet you are posting it with your real name publicly so you get to tell yourself you are being open and honest and "standing for your beliefs"

All society has done is force these people to act as if they were in a room surrounded by people, and reminded people that you should feel very much connected, your online profile is just that, a profile not a persona. If you want a persona use a fake username or an anonymous forum (like this place)

IF YOU WON'T SAY SOMETHING IN A ROOM FULL OF PEOPLE, YOU PROBABLY SHOULDN'T POST IT IN A PUBLIC FORUM WITH AN ACCOUNT USING YOUR REAL NAME

Telling the truth and stating facts is not publicly venting. The only time anyone would be in a room full of people would be either a party or at work. Neither of these is the right setting for this, perhaps a politics class might be the exception in which case I did make my unpopular views about liberalism heard. Eitherway, with the use of statistics and graphs it's much easier to get your point across online than verbalizing it irl .

 

[Michinomiya Hirohit]

How ridiculous is it that stating Human biology is now something that can make you lose your job but only when mentioning female biology.
Whenever a female goes on social media to state "men are pigs" does she lose her job for misandry? no she gets sympathy from fellow females. Yes guys will fuck as many females as they can given the chance and will fuck the most attractive females they can get given the chance. This is biologically hardwired in most men so they can spread their genes.

Now females will fuck only the most attractive males that show interest, this is hardwired to ensure she only has the best genes for her offspring. A close second for females is to get fucked by someone with alot of resources(money) so her offspring and herself have an easy life. If you mention this biological fact instead of saying females want "personality" and happen to be male online, you are a misogynist, will lose your job, be blacklisted and a social pariah.

We truly live in Orwelian times.

 

[your personality]

BlkPillPres delivers again.

 

[Reprobus]

>Tachanka



What's with trannies and sjw types larping with soviet names? do they not realise they would've been sent to Gulags?

Let them LARP, they also think they’re super heroes who are invincible jfl I’d love to put a bullet through their heads

 

[BlkPillPres]

Telling the truth and stating facts is not publicly venting.

1. They aren't mutually exclusive, it can be both

2. The truth doesn't matter, it never did. History shows you that, the winners write the history books and the majority rules, power is all that matters not truth, so unless you are in a position of power it makes no sense to gamble your life on "the truth", its just pointless idealism

The only time anyone would be in a room full of people would be either a party or at work.

1. Gathering of friends
2. Family gathering
3. Town hall meeting
4. Parent teacher meeting (talks like that could definitely happen there, a lot of white parents could easily state they don't feel like their child is safe with "the other kids" lol)

That's just off the top of my head, there are a lot of situations outside of "a party or work" that are public in which none of those individuals would say what they posted, but being online makes you feel "safe" and "disconnected" from consequences, you feel braver, because the "consequence" doesn't feel "immediate" (like someone being right in front of you)

Perhaps a politics class might be the exception in which case I did make my unpopular views about liberalism heard

Yeah, but to what end, if you aren't saying it for an actual change to take place in society, then whats the point of saying it and negatively impacting your life?

What you don't get is that if there is no end goal, and no intention to invoke change, ITS JUST VENTING. Its just that person publicly saying what they always wanted to say, for the sake of them "getting it off their chest", but they aren't trying to change anything

Example:
"13% of the population commits 50% of all violent crimes" (in reference to black crime rates)

True, what now?, you've just lost your job and you didn't change anyones mind or change any laws, or get society to acknowledge anything, so what was the point?

Eitherway, with the use of statistics and graphs it's much easier to get your point across online than verbalizing it irl .

Nope, we live in a world where emotional thinkers are the majority, stats and graphs work on people like us. "Heart felt" words work on normies (men and women). The average person needs to "feel" like the person trying to inform them of something is "speaking to them" and cares about their well being

That's why politicians do what they do

Its the reason why hillary will throw out lines like this to try and appeal to black voters:

View: https://youtu.be/DGDm4jkDbGQ?t=43

Its the reason why Ted Cruz will just randomly do a cringey video like this to appeal to "layman" Americans like he's "just one of the guys":

View: https://youtu.be/EaZGaJrd3x8?t=9

Etc

 

[AlexAnguish]

True story. I've already been deleted from facebook. Near the end before my account got zucced I saw lots of people posting about what I was saying. They tried to get me fired from my job but little did they know I put the incorrect workplace for where I worked lol. I imagine a bunch of landwhales and karen retards calling the walmart trying to get some guy who doesn't work there fired.

 

[JuikoTheo]

View: https://twitter.com/IAmGryphoneer/status/1337816460689813504

 

[AlexAnguish]

 

[Deleted member 26923]

People don't like hearing the truth

 

[Solo Disident]

How ridiculous is it that stating Human biology is now something that can make you lose your job but only when mentioning female biology.
Whenever a female goes on social media to state "men are pigs" does she lose her job for misandry? no she gets sympathy from fellow females. Yes guys will fuck as many females as they can given the chance and will fuck the most attractive females they can get given the chance. This is biologically hardwired in most men so they can spread their genes.

Now females will fuck only the most attractive males that show interest, this is hardwired to ensure she only has the best genes for her offspring. A close second for females is to get fucked by someone with alot of resources(money) so her offspring and herself have an easy life. If you mention this biological fact instead of saying females want "personality" and happen to be male online, you are a misogynist, will lose your job, be blacklisted and a social pariah.

We truly live in Orwelian times.

only way to even again is to repress women again.
while giving men more freedom if you ask my personal preference.