Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Soytard gets shot trying to fight armed man

MonkeyInaT34

MonkeyInaT34

★Rapistissimo of The Cunny Union★
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 22, 2024
Posts
26,144
Online time
1d 19h
 
Don't bring your soylent to a gun fight.
 
goddamn I laughed for solid minute
 
lol

Tom and Jerry ahh agony
 
Technology is dysgenic.
 
He deserved it, he looked like a complete buffoon with takin of his shirt
 
He should have aimed straight for the head honestly.
 
He fell down and screamed like in a Tom and Jerry cartoon:lul::lul::lul:
 
Avg .IS and INCELTEARS interaction
 
I would have to know the background to make an opinion
 
This has put a smile on my face. Thanks brocel.
 
 
can the guy with the gun be charged for this??
 
He deserved it, he looked like a complete buffoon with takin of his shirt
If you don't do that your shirt can get dirty, torn, be grabbed, and be pulled over your hands and head.
This. Did he think he would intimidate the armed man?
Like I said technology is dysgenic. The victim was physically superior and in 99.99999nine% of history would have been able to brutalise/beat to death the other one with no or perhaps minimal consequences. The technology corrupts society, like a kid in an electric wheelchair could beat Tom Aspinall with a gun. It's just unnatural and grating to be bullied by your inferiors. Do you like being told what to do by women? Unconsciously they both knew that the victim was superior and should come out on top of this interaction. His instincts were telling him this.
can the guy with the gun be charged for this??
IIRC charges weren't brought, and the victim died. I don't remember the details though so can't easily check.
 
Screamed and squealed like a pig
 
Like I said technology is dysgenic. The victim was physically superior and in 99.99999nine% of history would have been able to brutalise/beat to death the other one with no or perhaps minimal consequences. The technology corrupts society, like a kid in an electric wheelchair could beat Tom Aspinall with a gun. It's just unnatural and grating to be bullied by your inferiors. Do you like being told what to do by women? Unconsciously they both knew that the victim was superior and should come out on top of this interaction. His instincts were telling him this.
Why do you care if its dysgenic

If your in this site YOU are dysgenic
Guns atleast allow framecels to defend themselves and people to go ER
 
Don't bring your soylent to a gun fight.
I laughed so hard that I blinded my armed attacker with spewed out soy juice in their eyes and escaped.
 
"what are you gonna do, shoot me?" *gets shot*
 
If you don't do that your shirt can get dirty, torn, be grabbed, and be pulled over your hands and head.
The other guy was pointin a gun at him that was his smallest problem + he still lookes like an buffoon even if he has a reason for it
 
If you don't do that your shirt can get dirty, torn, be grabbed, and be pulled over your hands and head.

Like I said technology is dysgenic. The victim was physically superior and in 99.99999nine% of history would have been able to brutalise/beat to death the other one with no or perhaps minimal consequences. The technology corrupts society, like a kid in an electric wheelchair could beat Tom Aspinall with a gun. It's just unnatural and grating to be bullied by your inferiors. Do you like being told what to do by women? Unconsciously they both knew that the victim was superior and should come out on top of this interaction. His instincts were telling him this.

IIRC charges weren't brought, and the victim died. I don't remember the details though so can't easily check.
I kind of see what you're saying but the bigger guy isn't entitled to anything; I would have shot him too. The fact that he didn't see the gun as a threat meant that he was not really fit for survival.
 
Why do you care if its dysgenic

If your in this site YOU are dysgenic
Guns atleast allow framecels to defend themselves and people to go ER
If the gun gave him stronger and faster punches it would be just defending himself, shooting someone dead for wanting a fist fight is a lot more that.
I kind of see what you're saying but the bigger guy isn't entitled to anything; I would have shot him too. The fact that he didn't see the gun as a threat meant that he was not really fit for survival.
We don't know what happened before the video started, so we don't know who was (more) right or even what the issue was. But whatever the situation in this case, overall it would be better for people who are faster, stronger etc. to have ascendency over those who are weaker and slower.

In fact if there were some way of measuring I expect, excluding sex and significant age differences, it's the weaker, smaller people in this kind of thing who are more likely to be in the wrong. It's statistically proven that people who carry guns tend to provoke others, hoping to have an excuse to use their guns against people who otherwise would stamp them into the dirt. And in the USA, due to the culture and law, they are often successful and go unpunished.

Edit: Like I said we don't know what happened beforehand, and this is low-percentage, but from the fact that only one of them is angry it tends to support the idea that gunman disrespected shorts guy in some way, then pulled his gun so shorts guy couldn't smack him up like he deserved. If anyone wants to make the effort to find the news story that would be cool.
 
Last edited:
If the gun gave him stronger and faster punches it would be just defending himself, shooting someone dead for wanting a fist fight is a lot more that.

We don't know what happened before the video started, so we don't know who was (more) right or even what the issue was. But whatever the situation in this case, overall it would be better for people who are faster, stronger etc. to have ascendency over those who are weaker and slower.

In fact if there were some way of measuring I expect, excluding sex and significant age differences, it's the weaker, smaller people in this kind of thing who are more likely to be in the wrong. It's statistically proven that people who carry guns tend to provoke others, hoping to have an excuse to use their guns against people who otherwise would stamp them into the dirt. And in the USA, due to the culture and law, they are often successful and go unpunished.

Edit: Like I said we don't know what happened beforehand, and this is low-percentage, but from the fact that only one of them is angry it tends to support the idea that gunman disrespected shorts guy in some way, then pulled his gun so shorts guy couldn't smack him up like he deserved. If anyone wants to make the effort to find the news story that would be cool.
Because this is a simulation I have just suffered the Baader-Meinhoff effect and this video was sent to my X algorithm:





Hypothesis status: confirmed (subject to fact check).

Not that you need a 180 IQ to notice the pattern. So much of postmodern society is being mercilessly IRL trolled in various ways by your inferiors, as they have the power of the institutions and state behind them. So if you make them stop you go to prison. We live in a loosh farm.

tom-and-jerry-teasing.gif

Tom-and-Jerry-3-mtltimes-min.jpg

WM-TV-Top10-Worst-Things-That-Happened-to-Tom-From-Tom-and-Jerry_Q1G7X9-1F.webp


The last shall be first and the first shall be last, and the meek shall inherit the Earth.
 
Last edited:
If the gun gave him stronger and faster punches it would be just defending himself, shooting someone dead for wanting a fist fight is a lot more that.
You didnt answer my question
 
I'm going to add soytard to my collection of insults to use in future online arguments along with soycuck and others, it really fits this video and fits on many people I see.
 
Why do you care if it's dysgenic?

If you're in this site then YOU are dysgenic.
Guns allow framecels to defend themselves and people to go ER.
 
Sometimes I can't even comprehend how a human can be this stupid
 
If the gun gave him stronger and faster punches it would be just defending himself, shooting someone dead for wanting a fist fight is a lot more that.

We don't know what happened before the video started, so we don't know who was (more) right or even what the issue was. But whatever the situation in this case, overall it would be better for people who are faster, stronger etc. to have ascendency over those who are weaker and slower.

In fact if there were some way of measuring I expect, excluding sex and significant age differences, it's the weaker, smaller people in this kind of thing who are more likely to be in the wrong. It's statistically proven that people who carry guns tend to provoke others, hoping to have an excuse to use their guns against people who otherwise would stamp them into the dirt. And in the USA, due to the culture and law, they are often successful and go unpunished.

Edit: Like I said we don't know what happened beforehand, and this is low-percentage, but from the fact that only one of them is angry it tends to support the idea that gunman disrespected shorts guy in some way, then pulled his gun so shorts guy couldn't smack him up like he deserved. If anyone wants to make the effort to find the news story that would be cool.
Bigger, faster already have advantages, so they are not entitled to anything more. It is not dysgenic to invent weapons, it is a form of supremacy in itself. People larger than me are not my betters, they just have an advantage in one area.
 
This may top the Pennsylvania snow shovel video for me, lol
 

Similar threads

kay'
Replies
32
Views
1K
Misogynist Vegeta
Misogynist Vegeta
mrlunatic
Replies
10
Views
357
Rick prime
Rick prime
andrej
Replies
2
Views
491
BasedGoyslopReviews
BasedGoyslopReviews
Retardfuel
Replies
11
Views
1K
Robespierre
Robespierre

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top