MonkeyInaT34
★Rapistissimo of The Cunny Union★
★★★★★
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2024
- Posts
- 26,144
- Online time
- 1d 19h
Tom and Jerry ahh agony
![]()
![]()
Idiot
lol
Tom and Jerry ahh agony
This. Did he think he would intimidate the armed man?He deserved it, he looked like a complete buffoon with takin of his shirt
Only if he hoped he would die of pure cringeThis. Did he think he would intimidate the armed man?
Avg .IS and INCELTEARS interaction
If you don't do that your shirt can get dirty, torn, be grabbed, and be pulled over your hands and head.He deserved it, he looked like a complete buffoon with takin of his shirt
Like I said technology is dysgenic. The victim was physically superior and in 99.99999nine% of history would have been able to brutalise/beat to death the other one with no or perhaps minimal consequences. The technology corrupts society, like a kid in an electric wheelchair could beat Tom Aspinall with a gun. It's just unnatural and grating to be bullied by your inferiors. Do you like being told what to do by women? Unconsciously they both knew that the victim was superior and should come out on top of this interaction. His instincts were telling him this.This. Did he think he would intimidate the armed man?
IIRC charges weren't brought, and the victim died. I don't remember the details though so can't easily check.can the guy with the gun be charged for this??
Why do you care if its dysgenicLike I said technology is dysgenic. The victim was physically superior and in 99.99999nine% of history would have been able to brutalise/beat to death the other one with no or perhaps minimal consequences. The technology corrupts society, like a kid in an electric wheelchair could beat Tom Aspinall with a gun. It's just unnatural and grating to be bullied by your inferiors. Do you like being told what to do by women? Unconsciously they both knew that the victim was superior and should come out on top of this interaction. His instincts were telling him this.
I laughed so hard that I blinded my armed attacker with spewed out soy juice in their eyes and escaped.Don't bring your soylent to a gun fight.
goddamn I laughed for solid minute
Should have tossed the shirt on the gun then "got off the x" and attacked him while he was distracted with a non functional (cloth jammed) gun.
The other guy was pointin a gun at him that was his smallest problem + he still lookes like an buffoon even if he has a reason for itIf you don't do that your shirt can get dirty, torn, be grabbed, and be pulled over your hands and head.
I kind of see what you're saying but the bigger guy isn't entitled to anything; I would have shot him too. The fact that he didn't see the gun as a threat meant that he was not really fit for survival.If you don't do that your shirt can get dirty, torn, be grabbed, and be pulled over your hands and head.
Like I said technology is dysgenic. The victim was physically superior and in 99.99999nine% of history would have been able to brutalise/beat to death the other one with no or perhaps minimal consequences. The technology corrupts society, like a kid in an electric wheelchair could beat Tom Aspinall with a gun. It's just unnatural and grating to be bullied by your inferiors. Do you like being told what to do by women? Unconsciously they both knew that the victim was superior and should come out on top of this interaction. His instincts were telling him this.
IIRC charges weren't brought, and the victim died. I don't remember the details though so can't easily check.
If the gun gave him stronger and faster punches it would be just defending himself, shooting someone dead for wanting a fist fight is a lot more that.Why do you care if its dysgenic
If your in this site YOU are dysgenic
Guns atleast allow framecels to defend themselves and people to go ER
We don't know what happened before the video started, so we don't know who was (more) right or even what the issue was. But whatever the situation in this case, overall it would be better for people who are faster, stronger etc. to have ascendency over those who are weaker and slower.I kind of see what you're saying but the bigger guy isn't entitled to anything; I would have shot him too. The fact that he didn't see the gun as a threat meant that he was not really fit for survival.
Because this is a simulation I have just suffered the Baader-Meinhoff effect and this video was sent to my X algorithm:If the gun gave him stronger and faster punches it would be just defending himself, shooting someone dead for wanting a fist fight is a lot more that.
We don't know what happened before the video started, so we don't know who was (more) right or even what the issue was. But whatever the situation in this case, overall it would be better for people who are faster, stronger etc. to have ascendency over those who are weaker and slower.
In fact if there were some way of measuring I expect, excluding sex and significant age differences, it's the weaker, smaller people in this kind of thing who are more likely to be in the wrong. It's statistically proven that people who carry guns tend to provoke others, hoping to have an excuse to use their guns against people who otherwise would stamp them into the dirt. And in the USA, due to the culture and law, they are often successful and go unpunished.
Edit: Like I said we don't know what happened beforehand, and this is low-percentage, but from the fact that only one of them is angry it tends to support the idea that gunman disrespected shorts guy in some way, then pulled his gun so shorts guy couldn't smack him up like he deserved. If anyone wants to make the effort to find the news story that would be cool.
You didnt answer my questionIf the gun gave him stronger and faster punches it would be just defending himself, shooting someone dead for wanting a fist fight is a lot more that.
Begging the QuestionYou didnt answer my question
Seethe tallfag.Technology is dysgenic.
Why do you care if it's dysgenic?
If you're in this site then YOU are dysgenic.
Guns allow framecels to defend themselves and people to go ER.
Bigger, faster already have advantages, so they are not entitled to anything more. It is not dysgenic to invent weapons, it is a form of supremacy in itself. People larger than me are not my betters, they just have an advantage in one area.If the gun gave him stronger and faster punches it would be just defending himself, shooting someone dead for wanting a fist fight is a lot more that.
We don't know what happened before the video started, so we don't know who was (more) right or even what the issue was. But whatever the situation in this case, overall it would be better for people who are faster, stronger etc. to have ascendency over those who are weaker and slower.
In fact if there were some way of measuring I expect, excluding sex and significant age differences, it's the weaker, smaller people in this kind of thing who are more likely to be in the wrong. It's statistically proven that people who carry guns tend to provoke others, hoping to have an excuse to use their guns against people who otherwise would stamp them into the dirt. And in the USA, due to the culture and law, they are often successful and go unpunished.
Edit: Like I said we don't know what happened beforehand, and this is low-percentage, but from the fact that only one of them is angry it tends to support the idea that gunman disrespected shorts guy in some way, then pulled his gun so shorts guy couldn't smack him up like he deserved. If anyone wants to make the effort to find the news story that would be cool.





