Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Soyciety will one day be populated by a single man and billions of foids

MuddyBuddy

MuddyBuddy

It's pointless
★★
Joined
Jul 27, 2021
Posts
1,176
This imo will be the end result of feminism. The purpose of men throughout history has been to provide and protect femoids from the harsh reality of nature. In todays world however men are less needed to protect women because we've set up systems designed to protect women instead. In time I think women will realize men are less needed as automation begins to really take hold. A really interesting article highlights this from a feminist.


What kind of men would you choose for breeding? Do you base selection on physical or mental characteristics?
The most suitable men would simply be those who are fit in both body and mind. This is also related to genetic modification. Genetic engineering is already taking place by way of tests given to couples when they marry to prevent the passing of dangerous genetic material. There is no doubt such concepts will expand as we understand more about how the genome actually works. Healthy and fit men will always be ideal, but not "brutes," which has more to do with mental attributes than physical. Anyone can lift weights. Any criteria decided upon as the quintessential grade would have to be extensively defined and revised as time goes on, or as science advances and the human species and its needs evolve.

She's talking here about engineering the ideal chad. Later she mentioned keeping men for the sole purpose of breeding and labor.

But don't men have value beyond breeding?
If technology has not advanced to a point where labour can be done without men, the few men that are necessary for said labour will be allowed to work on the outside of the reservations to complete whatever tasks necessary—if they wish.
But then we get to the crux of the matter. The number 1-10% is merely a virtue signal (by this toilets insane standards). Because what she then mentioned utterly contradicts it.

What about the ambitions of the individual? Some men may aspire to more than luxury breeding pens.
Some would argue it would be a dystopian world because it wouldn't be free in the present conventional sense. However that is misguided. It will be utopian because it will be a world almost without conflict where people cooperate and are treated properly within a well-engineered and long-forged system. If everything is great for almost everyone the point is null. Survival and socio-organic wellbeing are the most important elements in life. Diversity of principles and standards is only necessary in a world of multiple nations, cultures, societies, and religions due to fear of oppression. So, how is this world any better? Because some people have potential opportunities to do certain things?

That's kind of depressing.


[UWSL]The purpose of living is merely to persist and perpetuate our species. If someone is willing to give you all you require to survive and live comfortably, simply because you exist, then you have already achieved all that truly matters.[/UWSL]

We all know in practice men would strive to dominate the world as is the nature of the create with higher T levels. Given man's inherent superiority any actual freedom would lead to their domination over females. She obviously knows this otherwise why go to such lengths to reduce the male population other than the purpose being for females to dominate males by sheer numbers? But she then argues that the only purpose of existence is to perpetuate our species. In truth this would require merely a single man. In a post information world where automation and AI give humanity all our basic needs then he labor of men is no longer needed. At this point man would simply be needed for breeding purposes. The logical end for her at this point would be to simply engineer the perfect chad like Ganon for the all femoid soyciety to perpetuate itself.
The fucked up part is that as insane and dementated as I find this evil hole to be...I believe it is perfectly logically consistent and will one day be a reality if humanity doesn't go extinct before then.
 
male purpose is to provide for women. When automation and AI have improved living standards to the point where male labor is no longer needed men will be no longer needed other than for breeding which only requires one.
 
Average men, who relentlessly defend women and look down on involuntary celibates, will be wiped out too. The remaining men of this horrendous society ought to be physically and mentally fit, in the author's words, which means most men are out of her utopian dreams. This is for all men who support feminism or think they are better than involuntary celibates in a fundamental sense. You will be targeted in the future by the very creatures you defend. Good job.
 
I will survive no matter what, that's why I rejected the Cuckcine
 
cope + didnt read
 
I will survive no matter what, that's why I rejected the Cuckcine
Same
[UWSL]The purpose of living is merely to persist and perpetuate our species. If someone is willing to give you all you require to survive and live comfortably, simply because you exist, then you have already achieved all that truly matters.[/UWSL]​
So basically, women have already achieved all that truly matters.
 

Similar threads

brazi
Replies
7
Views
147
brazi
brazi
AngryUbermensch
Replies
29
Views
604
Slut_Annihilator298
Slut_Annihilator298
SecularNeo-Khazar
Replies
7
Views
273
Ventingblackpiller
Ventingblackpiller
Seahorsecel
Replies
54
Views
1K
Ventingblackpiller
Ventingblackpiller
Hoppipolla
Replies
4
Views
122
Hoppipolla
Hoppipolla

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top