Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Someone find this

LitVirgin

LitVirgin

Major
★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Posts
2,397
Screenshot 20200412 151000 Sync Dev

Id love to see this study keep in mind what women perceive as "unattractive" it could acuatually mean there looks match. I want to be proven wrong so badly and want to believe women actually would give me a chance but there isnt substantial evidence to back this in comparison to the overwhelming evidence they want chad
 
just be bluepilled theory
 
Even if you find a source, they will try to write it off and, failing that, backpedal and try to move the goal posts. In the end, even if you disprove all their arguments, they will fall back to insulting you, calling you an ugly virgin who will never get any sex.

You have to understand, they can't be moved by reason. To them, the fundamental truth of life is that INKEL=BAD and WOMYN=QWEEN, and nothing else matters. It's practically a religion.
 
That's just cope brocel
 
cause they know its all cope, they just don't want people to believe its unfair that's all.
 
Foid Logic -
sub 5 - I don't consider them human teehee
6/10 - 8/10 unattractive
8/10 - average
9/10 - 10/10 above average/hot
 
I want to be proven wrong so badly and want to believe women actually would give me a chance
They'll give you a chance after they hit the wall and have two kids, and you make enough money to betabux. But you will only get starfish sex every leap year while she fucks chads weekly on her "girl's nights out". Better to just escortcel.
 
View attachment 235702
Id love to see this study keep in mind what women perceive as "unattractive" it could acuatually mean there looks match. I want to be proven wrong so badly and want to believe women actually would give me a chance but there isnt substantial evidence to back this in comparison to the overwhelming evidence they want chad
Found the study. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1740144516304624
It's basically only saying that women who are married to partners more attractive than them are more likely to be conscious of their body and diet choices. So by trying to constantly look good for their chad husband they become depressed, instead of just not caring when they settle for some betabuxx.
It DOESN'T at all say that they are happier with the betabuxx because of the fact that he is less attractive. Never lol.
TLDR: Even this study shows they want chad more.
 
Hot people have it harder? WTF?!? I should find and kill the author (IN SMASH BROS)
 
View attachment 235702
Id love to see this study keep in mind what women perceive as "unattractive" it could acuatually mean there looks match. I want to be proven wrong so badly and want to believe women actually would give me a chance but there isnt substantial evidence to back this in comparison to the overwhelming evidence they want chad
>There are soime
Citation fucking needed. Oh wait, there is none? That's because it doesn't fucking exist.
 
when women talk about “ugly men” they mean sub-8.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top