Rapistcel
Loser in the game of life.
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 25, 2024
- Posts
- 25,205
- Online time
- 4d 15h
I this thread I won't even extend myself about all the law privileges foids have like a foid getting much lower sentence just because of being a foid.
I'm gonna talk about how society reacts depending of gender.
Here there is a retarded feminist concept (of course supported by all media) that claims women that are killed, are because of the fact of being women). This concept says that there is an imaginary patriarchal structure that makes men killing women and that the only reason of that is because of "machismo" (a feminist term used to mean males being superior than female).
There is a entire law about this and when man kills his wife or gf, all the media say "gender violence", "machista violence", "violence against women", despite the crime having nothing to do with gender. For example this law makes that if a man kills his wife because of a reason that has nothing to do with gender, it's considered "gender violence" so the punishment for the man is much higher. Of course this law doesn't applies for women killing their husbands.
In fact I will talk about how Spanish media behave when someone kills depending of gender.
If a woman kills her husband the media probably will completely ignore that and in case of showing it, they will falsely claim that the man was an abuser.
But if a the man kills the foid, all the retarded media and politicians will say that he killed her for being a woman (despite no evidence of that being the reason of the crime) and they will make acts against "machista violence" despite there isn't any case of a foid being killed because of being a woman.
Also, people are retarded and when you show them that this concept is fake an invention to criminalize men they ask "well, then why there are more women killed than men? "
Men have more physical strength than foids, obviously they will have it more easy to kill in a country where guns are illegal you retarded wokes. If women had naturally more physical strength, the statistic would be reversal.
I'm gonna talk about how society reacts depending of gender.
Here there is a retarded feminist concept (of course supported by all media) that claims women that are killed, are because of the fact of being women). This concept says that there is an imaginary patriarchal structure that makes men killing women and that the only reason of that is because of "machismo" (a feminist term used to mean males being superior than female).
There is a entire law about this and when man kills his wife or gf, all the media say "gender violence", "machista violence", "violence against women", despite the crime having nothing to do with gender. For example this law makes that if a man kills his wife because of a reason that has nothing to do with gender, it's considered "gender violence" so the punishment for the man is much higher. Of course this law doesn't applies for women killing their husbands.
In fact I will talk about how Spanish media behave when someone kills depending of gender.
If a woman kills her husband the media probably will completely ignore that and in case of showing it, they will falsely claim that the man was an abuser.
But if a the man kills the foid, all the retarded media and politicians will say that he killed her for being a woman (despite no evidence of that being the reason of the crime) and they will make acts against "machista violence" despite there isn't any case of a foid being killed because of being a woman.
Also, people are retarded and when you show them that this concept is fake an invention to criminalize men they ask "well, then why there are more women killed than men? "
Men have more physical strength than foids, obviously they will have it more easy to kill in a country where guns are illegal you retarded wokes. If women had naturally more physical strength, the statistic would be reversal.
Last edited:





