Everything in human society that conceals sexuality - whether it's religious ideas viewing chastity as a good thing, morals about sex talk in professional environments / communities, prohibiting sexuality in public, even to songs from not so long ago that were sexually suggestive but not explicit, down even to the very clothes that we wear exist to gaslight and restrain sexually undesirable men.
Imagine a world where all these restrictions are removed. People are naked, can fuck whenever they want, talk whenever they want, and no religion. The thought of sex would be on your mind way more frequently, just from your exposure to it constantly, and for sexually undesirable men, that leads to anger; get enough angry sexually undesirable men and that leads to mass social violence.
So naturally, human beings organized society with certain rules regarding sexuality specifically to maintain the anger and sadness of sexually undesirable men, so they can just go along with their life - usually just working until their dead alone; by giving them religious delusions about chastity being a good thing, they can be distracted from their lack of sexual fulfillment. By giving people clothes, they restrain sexually exciting visuals. By prohibiting talk in professional environments and communities, you prevent sexually undesirable men from being angered at their lack of sexual success.
You might believe these restrictions serve some other role, but none of these restrictions serve any function as important as this one.
If you want proof, just look at how people actually treat you in real life compared to the expectations society sets out. Sure, people may bend a knee to basic social rules regarding basic formal kindness, responding to you with politeness for your inquiries, giving you a nice pat on the back if you need it. But beyond that, nobody wants to form a close relationship with you. Why is this? Simply put, men and women form close relationships to be able to bend certain social rules and talk freely (for example, sex), and I can tell you, that many men and women don't want close relationships where they still have to give a nod to basic social etiquette regarding sexual discussion. Men and women feel restrained when they try to form relationships with you, because they know you will be angered if they start discussing sexual matters with you.
Nothing so confirms this than music. So much music from the 2010s and before (now there's much more explicit music just by virtue of an increasingly dumbed down population that doesn't value lyrics and the atomization of different interests from different hierarchical groups) had so much sexual innuendos that are never explained explicitly, specifically so sexually active men and women can relate to one another about the activity, while gaslighting non-sexhavers about what the "big boys" or "adults" are talking about.
What comes to mind immediately, for example, is Katy Perry's "E.T.", where she tells the Alien to "take her" and "fill her with his poison"; or perhaps Peter Gabriel's Sledgehammer (his penis); or even the 1920s swing songs where euphemisms for "whistle" and "blow" are used.
Incorporate all of this. What other conclusion can one come to other than modesty is used to gaslight and trick sexless, ugly, gross men into going along with social functionality while not experiencing a need that most people get or would kill themselves if they could never get?
Imagine a world where all these restrictions are removed. People are naked, can fuck whenever they want, talk whenever they want, and no religion. The thought of sex would be on your mind way more frequently, just from your exposure to it constantly, and for sexually undesirable men, that leads to anger; get enough angry sexually undesirable men and that leads to mass social violence.
So naturally, human beings organized society with certain rules regarding sexuality specifically to maintain the anger and sadness of sexually undesirable men, so they can just go along with their life - usually just working until their dead alone; by giving them religious delusions about chastity being a good thing, they can be distracted from their lack of sexual fulfillment. By giving people clothes, they restrain sexually exciting visuals. By prohibiting talk in professional environments and communities, you prevent sexually undesirable men from being angered at their lack of sexual success.
You might believe these restrictions serve some other role, but none of these restrictions serve any function as important as this one.
If you want proof, just look at how people actually treat you in real life compared to the expectations society sets out. Sure, people may bend a knee to basic social rules regarding basic formal kindness, responding to you with politeness for your inquiries, giving you a nice pat on the back if you need it. But beyond that, nobody wants to form a close relationship with you. Why is this? Simply put, men and women form close relationships to be able to bend certain social rules and talk freely (for example, sex), and I can tell you, that many men and women don't want close relationships where they still have to give a nod to basic social etiquette regarding sexual discussion. Men and women feel restrained when they try to form relationships with you, because they know you will be angered if they start discussing sexual matters with you.
Nothing so confirms this than music. So much music from the 2010s and before (now there's much more explicit music just by virtue of an increasingly dumbed down population that doesn't value lyrics and the atomization of different interests from different hierarchical groups) had so much sexual innuendos that are never explained explicitly, specifically so sexually active men and women can relate to one another about the activity, while gaslighting non-sexhavers about what the "big boys" or "adults" are talking about.
What comes to mind immediately, for example, is Katy Perry's "E.T.", where she tells the Alien to "take her" and "fill her with his poison"; or perhaps Peter Gabriel's Sledgehammer (his penis); or even the 1920s swing songs where euphemisms for "whistle" and "blow" are used.
Incorporate all of this. What other conclusion can one come to other than modesty is used to gaslight and trick sexless, ugly, gross men into going along with social functionality while not experiencing a need that most people get or would kill themselves if they could never get?
