NTE
Greycel
โ
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2024
- Posts
- 37
- Online time
- 50m 13s
The concept of social dominance itself is a broad concept that usually leads to several aspects affecting one's lack. Being early prevalent in a social space mostly consists of Physiognomy and appearance.
Physiogamy:
Height
Face
Hair
This would grant the pass to fit in with any social group; else, it would be the fellow pretty men who would be the first ones to point you out and degrade you if you tried fitting in with them.
Appearance:
It consists of opted fashion, applied frauds, and self-justifying copes.
It has severe dependency on the looks part, as even trying to adapt the attire of high-valued men would lead to the ultimate degradation, as what's worse than a sub4 is a sub4 acting as a sub5.
Case 2: Social spaces valuing traits.
Mostly spaces with an obvious objective of hardship serving an environment of competitiveness and complication, even in this civilized space; the ignorance would only be forgiven by the charisma derived from one's appearance, or will be distinguished as jollyness. The prevalence in participation would still be led by higher psl (s).
Case 3: Social spaces valuing understanding.
Spaces revolving around a specific subject, these spaces are mostly appearance-dominated, but their entire forefront for the representation of their subculture is the highly valued, better-looking people.
(The ignorance, flaws and filth of a woman would always be underlooked by her smv, slutterly, and hoeflation)
Physiogamy:
Height
Face
Hair
This would grant the pass to fit in with any social group; else, it would be the fellow pretty men who would be the first ones to point you out and degrade you if you tried fitting in with them.
Appearance:
It consists of opted fashion, applied frauds, and self-justifying copes.
It has severe dependency on the looks part, as even trying to adapt the attire of high-valued men would lead to the ultimate degradation, as what's worse than a sub4 is a sub4 acting as a sub5.
Case 2: Social spaces valuing traits.
Mostly spaces with an obvious objective of hardship serving an environment of competitiveness and complication, even in this civilized space; the ignorance would only be forgiven by the charisma derived from one's appearance, or will be distinguished as jollyness. The prevalence in participation would still be led by higher psl (s).
Case 3: Social spaces valuing understanding.
Spaces revolving around a specific subject, these spaces are mostly appearance-dominated, but their entire forefront for the representation of their subculture is the highly valued, better-looking people.
(The ignorance, flaws and filth of a woman would always be underlooked by her smv, slutterly, and hoeflation)





