Blackpill So I saw this on IT

[Sanega Salt Nigga]

Ugly men getting into relationships doesn't disprove the blackpill you foids! Even if an ugly man gets a relationship he ALWAYS ENDS UP GETTING CHEATED ON the minute the foid finds a chad because the short dude would have to betabuxx just to get a gf.

Edit:I saw a comment on there talking about "cOnFiDeNce" guess what, you are risking getting rape charges if you are confident as a subhuman

 

[weaselbomber]

Can only admire the poster's ability to discern when a relationship is happy from Google Images pictures

 

[med-cel]

I saw a comment on there talking about "cOnFiDeNce" guess what, you are risking getting rape charges if you are confident as a subhuman

 

[Sanega Salt Nigga]

Oh and those "ugly" guys getting gfs ars hell of A LOT more attractive than me

 

[Diddy]

Oh and those "ugly" guys getting gfs ars hell of A LOT more attractive than me

Those ugly guys are either MTNs or tall LTNs.

 

[Chuddy]

why care about it
just stop caring nigga
stop caring about what a bunch of plebbit hambeasts and trannies think about u
all u gotta do, is stop caring
...and then u won't get all worked up over it

 

[Defetivecuckachu]

The blackpill isn't a mathematical theorem, where one counter-example is enough to disprove the theorem.

It's a set of observations about how ugly men, non-NT men, and low-status men strike out again and again and again in the realm of dating and relationships, that helps us to manage our hopes by having realistic expectations.

As St. Wilkes McDermid said, the existence of one lottery winner does not change the fact the probability of winning the lottery is very small.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

For the love of god individual outliers don't disprove trends, don't try to argue on their level, lord have mercy.

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

IT are bullies. Letting innocent people cope in their safe space is too much to ask apparently.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

The blackpill isn't a mathematical theorem, where one counter-example is enough to disprove the theorem.

It's a set of observations about how ugly men, non-NT men, and low-status men strike out again and again and again in the realm of dating and relationships, that helps us to manage our hopes by having realistic expectations.

As St. Wilkes McDermid said, the existence of one lottery winner does not change the fact the probability of winning the lottery is very small.

Thank god, some sanity.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

IT are bullies. Letting innocent people cope in their safe space is too much to ask apparently.

We are one of the few groups left you are allowed to hurt without having to fear societal repercussions. Bullies will search us out wherever we go. Someone has to drive some more men into going ER after all.

 

[MillionBashStream97]

Nobody here denies those exists...

It's just pointless to talk about them, or even consider them, because no fruitful discussion comes out of talking about exceptions.

Yes, ugly and short men that are in happy relationships exist.
Can we now talk about what the 90% are dealing with now?

Oh, you don't care about those, and just want to talk about the 10%? Ah, cool.

 

[Ghostface]

i think the worst part about IT is that Princesskitty is run by her dipshit husband rather than the goblina herself, smug ass 3rd world piece of shits

 

[Celasius]

This is so retarded. NO ONE here says ugly men are destined to die alone. What we’re claiming here is that ugly men are evidently less desirable and it is much, MUCH harder to accomplish the bare minimum as us.

Even if we were to get into a relationship, the chances of keeping it are noticeably lower than the average normie’s.

And besides, seeing a couple with an “ugly” guy (who I’m willing to bet is just an average looking guy for those fucks), without the proper context behind it doesn’t prove anything. Who knows? Maybe he’s betabuxxing. Maybe he’s seamaxxing. Maybe it’s not genuine love and they’d break up by tomorrow.

Fucking braindead IT at it again, my goodness.

The blackpill isn't a mathematical theorem, where one counter-example is enough to disprove the theorem.

Sorry, that’s already too much for them to comprehend.

 

[Celasius]

It's a set of observations about how ugly men, non-NT men, and low-status men strike out again and again and again in the realm of dating and relationships, that helps us to manage our hopes by having realistic expectations.

They don’t bother seeing the majority of the cases, they just anecdotally observe the minority and operate all their assumptions under it.

> thousands of ugly men can’t get laid irrespective of their personality and the effort they put into themselves
> one “ugly” guy gets a girl
> blackpilled disproved. Le evil inkwells are wrong, I’m right

 

[i_want_emo_gf]

It’s like saying you have no excuse to be poor if you were born into a poor family because there are people that escaped poverty

 

[1nsomniak]

Oh and those "ugly" guys getting gfs ars hell of A LOT more attractive than me