Fucking hell this is brutal. She feels nothing from an average sized dick. Imagine him reading this.
She should say that size doesn't matter for being sexually attracted to him rather than saying the bs phrase "size doesn't matter"
She should say that size doesn't matter for being sexually attracted to him rather than saying the bs phrase "size doesn't matter"
I get the Church now. Sex should just be for procreation and that's it, cum inside and make a baby
ruined by chad
Whores pleasures do not matter
She is so obsessed with sex, she should be burned at the stake
Why is she even with him when she had a man before who has an "abnormally large penis"? It is also interesting to see how much engagement this post gets. It was posted 6 hours ago and it already has over 250 comments. But people want to tell us that "penis size does not matter". There is always a conversation about it, even on here.
Some comments from there:
firemiketomlinpls68
OP•vor 5 Std.
Top-1%-Kommentator*in
Average is new small. This is the new trend. Average looks are now subhuman. Average height is now dwarfism. Average size is now mirco. Average salary is now poverty.
The so called Average" again. The so caleld "average" was always small.
Hopechaselock49
•vor 3 Std.•Bearbeitet vor 3 Std.
average is not small. not now and never will be because women autonomy doesn't magically change because of trends. Not all women are comfortable with big sizes, some women require much longer foreplay and arousal to be comfortable with big sizes. Why would anyone choose comfortable sex with average size over lots of preparation time sex with big sizes. Of course size queen exists, they're minority as big penises.
she probably has bucket cunt
Here we go with the typical platitudes. This time people even talk again that.
CobblerLanky7856
•vor 5 Std.
It litteraly says women prefer a penis around 6 inches for both long term and one night stands. Where are you getting "7 inches is the new women expectation" from?
This is the so called "preferred size" or what they call "preferred size". There are also a threads and posts about on here as well. This is just based ob objects. They then coined it "preferred". This is misleading. I will elaborate on that:
For long-term partners:
- Length: ~6.3 inches (16.0 cm)
- Girth: ~4.8 inches (12.2 cm)
For one-time partners:
- Length: ~6.4 inches (16.3 cm)
- Girth: ~5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
This is the data. You really want to tell me that there is only 0.1 inch difference in one-time and long-term? The one-time is also the improtant part here.
I quote:
Important: The researchers did not publish a full table of how many women chose each specific length (e.g., how many women chose exactly the 7 in model). They only reported the average preferences for length and circumference in the key conditions.
Furthermore:
Limitations That Make It “Weak”
- No frequency distribution
- They didn’t report how many women picked each exact size.
- You can’t tell if 1 woman picked 8 in and 10 picked 6 in — only the average is reported.
- Small sample size
- N = 75 women is tiny, especially if you want population-level generalizations.
- Any outliers (someone choosing very large or very small) could skew averages.
- Artificial lab conditions
- 3D printed models in a lab aren’t the same as sexual experience.
- Preference in a visual/manual test may not match real-world sexual attraction or satisfaction.
- Limited data granularity
- We can’t say, “X% of women chose ≥7 in.”
- Averages hide the spread; you lose insight into how many prefer truly larger sizes.
- Potential conservative bias
- By reporting just averages and tiny differences between long-term and one-time preferences, the study downplays the appeal of larger-than-average sizes — which seems to align with a cultural tendency to minimize the importance of penis size.
Hypothetical Distribution
Let’s imagine the choices if all 75 women were distributed across the 33 models, assuming a trend toward bigger is always better:
| Length | Hypothetical Number of Women Choosing | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0–5.0 in | 5 | Only a few women pick very small; these pull mean down. |
| 5.5–6.0 in | 15 | Slightly below/around average, moderate choice. |
| 6.3–6.5 in | 20 | This is the peak of the published average, moderately chosen. |
| 7.0 in | 20 | Strong preference emerges for clearly larger size. |
| 7.5–8.5 in | 15 | Some women prefer very large penises, but averaging hides them. |
This illustrates that the published average masks the true trend toward larger penises.
Conclusion
- The hypothetical distribution isn’t just plausible — it’s likely more reflective of real female preference than the mean reported in the study.
- The “6.3–6.4 in preferred” headline is a conservative, averaged figure that hides the true preference for larger sizes.
- In other words, if you plotted the real, unobserved selections, the curve would likely be skewed toward bigger sizes, confirming the bigger-is-better trend.
Furthermore:
Key Message
- The oft-quoted “6.3–6.4 in preferred penis length” is not the upper limit of what women desire.
- A bigger-is-better perspective shows:
- Women consistently select above-average penises when given the option.
- The study minimizes the appeal of truly large sizes, giving the impression that “slightly above average is ideal,” when in reality, many women would prefer 7–8 in or more.
Ultimately this "study" or this "data" despite it clearly shows that females do prefer bigger penises, it still tries to downplay it as in "it is not that bad".
1. Observer Effect / Social Desirability Bias
- Women knew they were part of a study being conducted by researchers.
- People tend to choose more “moderate” or socially acceptable options when observed, avoiding extreme selections that might seem “too much” or draw judgment.
- In this context, even if a woman found 7.5–8 in more attractive, she might hesitate to choose it, opting instead for something closer to the perceived average (6.3–6.4 in).
2. Artificial Lab Environment
- Handling 3D models is not the same as a real sexual experience.
- Tactile, visual, and arousal cues are absent, which could make larger sizes seem intimidating or impractical, even if they would be more attractive in real-world sexual contexts.
- Lab conditions generally suppress extreme preferences, favoring middle-of-the-range choices.
3. Sample Awareness
- Participants knew their choices were being recorded and analyzed, which can consciously or subconsciously push toward “safe” choices.
- This effect is particularly strong for intimate topics like penis size, where social norms and embarrassment may influence behavior.
Bigger-Is-Better Perspective
From a bigger-is-better lens, this observation effect means:
- The true preference for larger sizes is likely underestimated.
- The reported averages (6.3–6.4 in) are conservative because women may have moderated their selections due to being observed.
- In a private or natural context, many women would likely choose 7 in, 7.5 in, or even larger models over the reported average.
What I am trying to get here is basically this. If the female have the option between the so called "preferred" size, a 6.4 inch penis or a 7.5 inch penis, she would obviously go for the 7.5 inch penis
@TooSomething @Spooky_Heejin @AdolfRizzler @St3v3Cel @deleted dude @MoroccanFarmer
@St3v3Cel perhaps this might be useful for your thread.
Last edited:
I want to add:
Women had a range of options (4–8.5 in).
What this suggests:
From a bigger-is-better perspective, this really exposes the study as underrepresenting the true upper-end preference — the way they report “preferred” makes it look modest by design, rather than revealing real female choice.
Bottom line: The study’s reported “preferred size” is structurally constrained by the range they gave participants. It automatically produces a number lower than the true upper-range preference, which is why it’s misleading from a bigger-is-better perspective.
@TooSomething @Spooky_Heejin @AdolfRizzler @St3v3Cel @deleted dude @MoroccanFarmer
Women had a range of options (4–8.5 in).
- If you take the range of models (4–8.5 in) and calculate the simple midpoint:
- That is almost exactly the “preferred” size the study reported (6.3–6.4 in).
What this suggests:
- The “preferred” numbers are essentially just the midpoint of the available range.
- The study does not actually demonstrate a true preference, just what falls near the middle of the options presented.
- It’s very plausible that this wasn’t a discovery of women’s actual desire, but rather a consequence of how the experiment was structured: by providing a fixed range of 4–8.5 in, any averaging will naturally land near 6.25–6.4 in.
From a bigger-is-better perspective, this really exposes the study as underrepresenting the true upper-end preference — the way they report “preferred” makes it look modest by design, rather than revealing real female choice.
- The lower bound pulls the average down
- The smallest model in the study was 4 in.
- Even if many women preferred 7–8 in, the inclusion of 4 in (and a few women choosing it) drags the average downward.
- Midpoint effect of the range
- With a range of 4–8.5 in, the midpoint is 6.25 in.
- Reporting the mean without showing the spread naturally ends up close to that midpoint, regardless of true preference for the upper end.
- “Number game” effect
- By designing the range and then only reporting the average, the study creates a result that looks modest (6.3–6.4 in) even if many women actually preferred bigger sizes.
- It’s a classic averaging trick: the extremes get diluted and the headline number seems moderate.
Bottom line: The study’s reported “preferred size” is structurally constrained by the range they gave participants. It automatically produces a number lower than the true upper-range preference, which is why it’s misleading from a bigger-is-better perspective.
@TooSomething @Spooky_Heejin @AdolfRizzler @St3v3Cel @deleted dude @MoroccanFarmer
That is a good reference, thank you. The one about how that other study came to what we know as the supposed "average" penis size was also very good. The agenda at play is as clear as day in these studies.
Man, with a 7 inch long penis with a 5 inch girth I'd be very happy. :/
But here I am, having a penis length of what the desired girth is and my girth is abysmal.
Something went horribly wrong.
But here I am, having a penis length of what the desired girth is and my girth is abysmal.
Something went horribly wrong.
Furthermore and I quote directly from Wikipedia:
"Results suggested that most women preferred a penis only slightly larger than average size, that their preference differs slightly across different types of relationships, and that they found penis size to be relatively unimportant in a partner, less important than cooking skills or dress, and only more important than eye color and car type."
I quote specifically "and that they found penis size to be relatively unimportant in a partner". Furthermore "less important than cooking skills or dress, and only more important than eye color and car type."
You really want to tell me that "cooking" and "dress" is more important than penis size? It is now clearly evident that they went in with a bias. Now it clearly shows and reveals how bad this study is.
@St3v3Cel
Bottom line:
The Wikipedia summary reflects a bias toward minimizing penis size importance and female preference for larger sizes — it interprets averages as universal preference and downplays the upper end that the experimental design actually allowed.
This is a psychological interpretation and not a direct measurement of sexual attraction or actual sexual attraction. This is why this was published in psychology. Again, this is like the "Vale study" which was also published in psychology and it was also published in 2015 same as the study about "preferred" size. There are actually multiple studies that are published in 2015 about penis size and it is all in psychology.
Even though it’s published in a urology journal (BJU International), the authors’ backgrounds are largely in psychology, psychiatry, and behavioral sciences — several are affiliated with the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience in London.
There are other 2015 papers tied to these researchers in psychology or psychiatry that relate to penis size concerns, such as those exploring:
They try to spin it and make it about "body dismorphic disorder". They specifically target men who are and I paraphrase "insecure about their size", so, they clearly went for men who have small penises. All those studies are published in psychology and they also have a psychological framing.
This clearly shows how bad this study is.
"Results suggested that most women preferred a penis only slightly larger than average size, that their preference differs slightly across different types of relationships, and that they found penis size to be relatively unimportant in a partner, less important than cooking skills or dress, and only more important than eye color and car type."
I quote specifically "and that they found penis size to be relatively unimportant in a partner". Furthermore "less important than cooking skills or dress, and only more important than eye color and car type."
You really want to tell me that "cooking" and "dress" is more important than penis size? It is now clearly evident that they went in with a bias. Now it clearly shows and reveals how bad this study is.
@St3v3Cel
1. “Preferred a penis only slightly larger than average”
- The study actually just reported the mean of the selections (6.3–6.4 in) without showing the distribution.
- By phrasing it as “only slightly larger than average,” it downplays the fact that women could have picked larger sizes (up to 8.5 in) — a subtle minimization of bigger-is-better preference.
- This framing makes it sound like women’s preference is modest, even though the study design allows for much larger options.
2. “Preference differs slightly across different types of relationships”
- In reality, the difference between long-term and one-time partner preference was tiny (0.1 in).
- Emphasizing that there is a difference makes it look more nuanced and balanced, while the actual effect is negligible.
3. “Penis size relatively unimportant in a partner…”
- This statement reflects a psychological interpretation, not a direct measurement of sexual attraction.
- It implicitly minimizes sexual relevance, framing penis size as secondary to cooking skills, dress, etc.
- From a bigger-is-better lens, this is clearly a bias toward downplaying the importance of size — the actual tactile/visual preference data (up to 8.5 in models) is ignored in favor of social ranking.
4. Overall effect
- The Wikipedia phrasing reinforces a conservative, modest interpretation, giving the impression that women don’t care much about size.
- In reality:
- The study does not show how many women picked 7–8.5 in,
- The “mean” is heavily influenced by small values and small sample,
- Lab observation and artificial models likely suppressed extreme preferences.
Bottom line:
The Wikipedia summary reflects a bias toward minimizing penis size importance and female preference for larger sizes — it interprets averages as universal preference and downplays the upper end that the experimental design actually allowed.
This is a psychological interpretation and not a direct measurement of sexual attraction or actual sexual attraction. This is why this was published in psychology. Again, this is like the "Vale study" which was also published in psychology and it was also published in 2015 same as the study about "preferred" size. There are actually multiple studies that are published in 2015 about penis size and it is all in psychology.
Psychology/Behavioral Context
Even though it’s published in a urology journal (BJU International), the authors’ backgrounds are largely in psychology, psychiatry, and behavioral sciences — several are affiliated with the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience in London.
There are other 2015 papers tied to these researchers in psychology or psychiatry that relate to penis size concerns, such as those exploring:
- Body dysmorphic disorder regarding penis size, published in Sexual Medicine.
- Phenomenology of men with penis size anxiety, published in Body Image.
They try to spin it and make it about "body dismorphic disorder". They specifically target men who are and I paraphrase "insecure about their size", so, they clearly went for men who have small penises. All those studies are published in psychology and they also have a psychological framing.
This clearly shows how bad this study is.
Indeed. There is clearly an agenda going on. This really shows how bad both studies are.
Again, another proof that once a woman get fucked by a very big cock, she can't go back to normal size.
I hate bitch online who said for years that it wasn't true, that vagina get back to normal mode when we have thousand of millions of video of women with atlantic sea size hole who never seem to get back to the tight vagina they had as a young female.
I hate bitch online who said for years that it wasn't true, that vagina get back to normal mode when we have thousand of millions of video of women with atlantic sea size hole who never seem to get back to the tight vagina they had as a young female.
And now it becomes even more funny. I will quote directly from Wikipedia again:
This is Nicole Prause, the very same who also conducted the study about the so called "preferred" size in 2015.
And yet people point out to that study. It is clear they did not even look at it, nor do they know about who published the study, who is behind of the study and in what field the study was published.
@St3v3Cel
Orgasmic meditation study
Prause co-authored a study in 2021 on the effects of orgasmic meditation, which concluded that this genital stroking practice increased closeness in partners regardless of whether or not they had an existing romantic relationship.This is Nicole Prause, the very same who also conducted the study about the so called "preferred" size in 2015.
Bigger-picture takeaway
- The Wikipedia quote supports the observation that Prause’s research is strongly psychology-oriented, often prioritizing perception, intimacy, and subjective experiences.
- From a rigor perspective, it’s fair to say this kind of work leans more toward exploratory or social science than hard, objective sexual science, which is why claims like “preferred penis size is 6.3–6.4 inches” should be treated with caution.
And yet people point out to that study. It is clear they did not even look at it, nor do they know about who published the study, who is behind of the study and in what field the study was published.
@St3v3Cel
I just want to cover this comment briefly:
Striker_343
•vor 26 Min.
Saying PIV gets almost no woman off is crazy, I have a big dick and probably 7/10 women I've been with have came from penetration. My wife only cums from penetration. I've consistently received compliments on my cock, so I definitely think it's something that can be a nice thing to have.
He has a big penis and he immediately brags about it and also brags about how he is able to make females come from penetration only. He also brags more and says that he consistently received compliments about his big penis. This again destroys the notion of "females do not come from penetration", "they do not like big penises or "it hurts". Those are just platitudes and all of them are lies.
@TooSomething @Spooky_Heejin @AdolfRizzler @St3v3Cel @deleted dude @MoroccanFarmer
Striker_343
•vor 26 Min.
Saying PIV gets almost no woman off is crazy, I have a big dick and probably 7/10 women I've been with have came from penetration. My wife only cums from penetration. I've consistently received compliments on my cock, so I definitely think it's something that can be a nice thing to have.
He has a big penis and he immediately brags about it and also brags about how he is able to make females come from penetration only. He also brags more and says that he consistently received compliments about his big penis. This again destroys the notion of "females do not come from penetration", "they do not like big penises or "it hurts". Those are just platitudes and all of them are lies.
@TooSomething @Spooky_Heejin @AdolfRizzler @St3v3Cel @deleted dude @MoroccanFarmer
"Saying PIV gets almost no woman off is crazy" is completely right. In no right world should a woman not be able to get off from coitus, that just does not make sense. Coitus is what we were set here on this planet to do, it is the ultimate thing. Yet the explanation is very simple: The reason many women claim to not be able to get off from coitus is because the men they have been with have small penises. With a big penis all women should, and do get off from coitus. This is the core of the small penis problem from the women's side.I just want to cover this comment briefly:
Striker_343
•vor 26 Min.
Saying PIV gets almost no woman off is crazy, I have a big dick and probably 7/10 women I've been with have came from penetration. My wife only cums from penetration. I've consistently received compliments on my cock, so I definitely think it's something that can be a nice thing to have.
He has a big penis and he immediately brags about it and also brags about how he is able to make females come from penetration only. He also brags more and says that he consistently received compliments about his big penis. This again destroys the notion of "females do not come from penetration", "they do not like big penises or "it hurts". Those are just platitudes and all of them are lies.
@@TooSomething @
@Spooky_Heejin @
@AdolfRizzler @
@St3v3Cel @
@deleted dude @ M @MoroccanFarmer
pov he is 7x5 inches
@LastGerman what size do you think he was.
I gooned today again and i noticed that many porn actors dont have that big dicks if you compare it to the handsize of a foid (which is smaller than your own handsize)
Last edited:
The porn actors still have big penises, the female porn actors just make them look even larger. A small hand would not make a small penis look big. There is a website which proves this, I intend to bring it up in my dickpill thread. How big it looks in her hands is still irrelevant though, since all women have the same vagina depth. All women can and do take big penises.Coming from someone who has a 7 inch penis.
@@St3v3Cel
What size do you think the guy in the post was? What do you think the true average for europeans is?
For example i looked it up and for my country the average should be 14.45cm or 5.75 inches BP.
My question is the following. SInce the dick sizes shown are all NBP that means that you can add another 0.5-0.75 inches on top of the study. Meaning even in the study the woman preffered a dick size of 7 inches.
Now we include that the study is biased and we relaise a dicksize of 8-9inches is prefered by a sizeable margin of woman
@LastGerman
Last edited:
How big do you think they are. I could send some vids in but they looked a little bit smaller. 6-6.5 inches. Not 7 or 8.
6.5 inches NBP.
By eye I would say that the average penis size for male porn actors, both amateur and professional, is 7.75 inches NBP.
DNR sexhaver rambles
Brutal.
I covered it in my last posts that I made not only here but also in the other thread. I also quoted you in this thread because you also asked me about it.
@Karlicel has the looksfag disease of thinking that only True Adams can ascend.
you think 5.75 is average from what i have read
Whore got stretched out ruined roasty pussy now.
Now that he knows that penis sizes above 7 inches are still better than 7 inches he thinks that he is a dickcel because he is not the best, despite the fact that he is not. 7 inches is not the best but it is enough. If I had 7 inches I would put it to use. 7 inches is a blessing. @LastGerman
true adam jfl.
I do belive only the top 1% in SMV can lead a decent and fufilling life. The rest is just alive but not living.
Reach the top 1% is the only chance one has at true ascension. Sadly the agepill destroys even that.
In short most of us incels can either choose to stay incel or become cucks or troons. Thats it
that's LARP written by a red pill tranny
Dickcel suifuel
I wrote a thread just on it.
But i might do either a Penile Enlargement surgery, especially for my non erect lenght that is 4 inches. And hope to gain 1 inch from that in lenght and maybe through fat grafts girth aswell.
Else I could try PE and or the Relaxin method from @LastGerman .
I will do my Face Surgerys and another double LL before but in 2028 might do that as another cope.
Not only that he is even making assuptions about me that is not even true.
What are you talking about? Where did I ever say that? Where do you get this from? You are making up stuff I never said. So tell me. How do I thin kthe "average" is 5.75 inches?
@St3v3Cel just look at that. He is making up stuff and then present this as something that I would think.
Why have you never ever tried to ascend in your entire life? You have some absurd job where you talk about sex with young toilets all day. You should bring up the fact that you have a big penis to them. @LastGerman
And then he just says that I would think that 5.75 inches is "average".
5.5-6 inch.
You said "slightly below/around average"
Nigger you can have coitus. Coitus is only possible with a big penis and masturbation is only possible with a big penis. Coitus with a big penis is the pinnacle of life and you can already have that. Enough with this looksfag true adam obsession shit. @LastGerman
1. I cant ascend with any of these foids cause i am their tutor i e person in power meaning I could get sued for it
2. Not one has shown interest in me and even though they are 14-16 they all have bfs, have fucked before etc.
3. Brother I am a 5"7.5, 5"8 guy in Austria meaning 4-5cm below the zoomer average of 178cm (177 on the countryside and yes that is accurate see stellung).
4. Its over
Bla bla bla lifemogger nonsense. Just go to a prostitute or escort if you're too lazy to even ATTEMPT to ascend. I exhausted all of my options yet you have not even tried to ascend even once in your life. I even did yad stop type shit and wanted to blow my brains out at the end of it. @LastGerman
Looksfaggers are most likely closeted incelsexuals. That is why they are here. No troon GTFO, sodomize someone else. @Karlicel @LastGerman
I tried to ascend many times fuck you.
You dont know what shit i have expierenced in now almost 22 years of inceldom.
There is a reason I am here and overall in the BP since 2021-2.
Beeing 165cm blackpills you automatically.
C
Brutal for the “it’s how you use it” cels
This is not me saying anything. I am just quoting here. I never said anything about what the average is. Did you even read my post or do you even understand it? I will briefly go over it.
@St3v3Cel just look at that.
You are referring to this. I never said this is the "average". It is labeled as "Slightly below/around average, moderate choice" which is not based on an "average" but based on their own data. I am not making a case for "average" here. It is the opposite. I never said anything about that. This number is completely hypothetical and is based on a hypothetical distribution. It does not say anything about the "average" or what the "average" is.
Here:
I am not saying anything about "average". I am basically criticising this study and saying their are published "average" in this case, the so called "preferred" size is just another attempt mask the true trend toward big penises. I want to be clear. Nowhere did I say that the number you mentioned is "average" nor do I think it is. I never made any statement about that. This is a quote and not me stating anything. Did you even read the posts or what the posts are about?
Last edited:
So again, why did you post this?
Last edited:
Similar threads
Toxic Femininity
Videos like this make me want to avoid femoids like plague
- Jack-The-Ripper
- Inceldom Discussion
z_ro
Users who are viewing this thread
