Serious Simps are manipulative and worse than beta bucks.

[Survivalist_Prepper]

Simps donate money and buy shit for women but they don't do it unconditionally. They always expect something in return so by default their behaviour is manipulative.

What's worse is that the cuck that married a woman with his money actually gets to have sex with his woman but simps are limited by both their screen and financial status.

So they are not only manipulative but broke version of beta bucks. What could be worse than that?

 

[Saint Cho]

Being a manipulative psychopath is based.

 

[Tarquinius]

Being a manipulative psychopath is based.

Especially when it's used against foids.

 

[Survivalist_Prepper]

Being a manipulative psychopath is based.

Unless women complain about you, its not based.

And women never complain about simps. They only complain about incels.

 

[BrutalandHard]

Betabux is a simp too, anyone exploited is a simp; simps don't take into account what they get in return, like most normies

Betabux people barely get sex, and even if they do it's not a good investment; but I agree with

simp < betabuxxer < escortmaxxer

 

[LesscoBlob]

Betabux is a simp too, anyone exploited is a simp; simp's don't take into account what they get in return, like most normies

 

[BrutalandHard]

What's wrong with being manipulative? You think people participate in a fair game thinking they have a chance of winning? You think people who win the lottery are "good people" and "better than other people" because they participate in a game with odds stacked against them? That's literally stupid, you may label it manipulative exploitative, I call it smart and analytic.

Also, simps don't have much to gain, they only ever lose their money; chad doesn't need to simp, simping never gives you anything, simping by definition is being exploited by women for your money; simps don't have sex they only ever pay for pixels, that's the worst return on investment ever.