PortraitOfTheAutist
Greycel
★
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Posts
- 46
In my opinion this is the only possible position for women after modern science (not to speak of their modern freedoms) has revealed them for the natural prostitutes and soulless beasts they are.
Women should be raised separately, not taught anything but the most rudimentary language, and then be groomed to be breeding stock. The best females will be bred by the best males: these best specimens will be chosen by a special eugenic council of men. It is true that under this scheme most men would not be fathers, but most men do not desire this anyway; they would, in exchange, get plenty of free sex, which is better than they can say for themselves now.
The noxious influence of women not only in politics and public life, but also in the culture, in the arts and letters, will be eliminated and the biological quality of the race will be improved under the direction and foresight and good taste of men.
It is only in modern society that people have thought such ridiculous things like women and men can be companions. There is almost no ancient or pre-modern society that believed that men and women are "natural companions" that complement each other psychologically. The idea that a woman can be your friend or especially your "soul mate" or "your everything" is a modern piece of stupidity that people typically confuse for nature, when in fact it is just the conventions of your people in this time that have deemed it so. Even today, Arabs don't think that men and women are natural companions and in this they are correct.
Breeding stock is the correct position--not cherished wife or mother or sister, etc.; the idea that women are to be venerated is a Christian-Teutonic piece of stupidity that destroyed the West. They are to be chattel and nothing more.
Women should be raised separately, not taught anything but the most rudimentary language, and then be groomed to be breeding stock. The best females will be bred by the best males: these best specimens will be chosen by a special eugenic council of men. It is true that under this scheme most men would not be fathers, but most men do not desire this anyway; they would, in exchange, get plenty of free sex, which is better than they can say for themselves now.
The noxious influence of women not only in politics and public life, but also in the culture, in the arts and letters, will be eliminated and the biological quality of the race will be improved under the direction and foresight and good taste of men.
It is only in modern society that people have thought such ridiculous things like women and men can be companions. There is almost no ancient or pre-modern society that believed that men and women are "natural companions" that complement each other psychologically. The idea that a woman can be your friend or especially your "soul mate" or "your everything" is a modern piece of stupidity that people typically confuse for nature, when in fact it is just the conventions of your people in this time that have deemed it so. Even today, Arabs don't think that men and women are natural companions and in this they are correct.
Breeding stock is the correct position--not cherished wife or mother or sister, etc.; the idea that women are to be venerated is a Christian-Teutonic piece of stupidity that destroyed the West. They are to be chattel and nothing more.