Shoah*
Do ur homework xD
Do ur homework xD
He did not believe he was the messiah.
so you're fine with 'anuddah'?
yes he did
At least it's spelled right lol
Oh ok, a goy trying to educate me about my own religion
You are a strange one. Care to explain why you feel this way?
In short? Because I believe a property won't bring long term happiness to me.
While a partner with same rights as me can improve me, even though it's harder in the short term.
yes
I have studied the jewish religion very profoundly. I read writings by notable jews about it, and this is what I have learned:
"What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.
[...]
"Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man – and turns them into commodities. Money is the universal self-established value of all things. It has, therefore, robbed the whole world – both the world of men and nature – of its specific value. Money is the estranged essence of man’s work and man’s existence, and this alien essence dominates him, and he worships it.
"The god of the Jews has become secularized and has become the god of the world. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange."
hopefully you find this educational
honestly all of this kike shit is thread derailment
so I'll conclude that discussion by saying that kikes coming to .IS to promote their feminist creed is shameful
so I'll conclude that discussion by saying that kikes coming to .IS to promote their feminist creed is shameful
Its quite clear you "studied" Judaism with the conformation bias.
In short you looked for evidence that Jews are the way you want them to be.
Quoting Marx is your way to critic Judaism? Lol at least show some knowledge.
Idk tbh. I don't know if I really want women as property because, ultimately, she wouldn't genuinely love me. It would be like having an escort, someone there for the facade, but not for the feelings. But on the other hand, the idea isn't that bad. Imagine being able to have any beautiful woman you desire, without the need to consider her emotions or thoughts. Why should her feelings matter when, historically, women have treated men like trash, using them, discarding them, manipulating their affections for personal gain. (We're talking about Minecraft btw)
>No, IDK - 8 votes
Men biologically need women for affection, intimacy and sex.
We just need to make women dependent on men so that there is a mutually beneficial relationship between us again. We need to remove the anti-male feminist brainwash conditioning.
As it is right now, both men AND women are miserable (to very different degrees). Men for obvious reasons. But also women because with absolute freedom and no consequences, they chase Chad endlessly to their own detriment.
They are willing to get abused by a toxic Chad just because he's good looking. Women need to be reined in a bit for their own good.
Both men and women would benefit from patriarchy.
We just need to make women dependent on men so that there is a mutually beneficial relationship between us again. We need to remove the anti-male feminist brainwash conditioning.
As it is right now, both men AND women are miserable (to very different degrees). Men for obvious reasons. But also women because with absolute freedom and no consequences, they chase Chad endlessly to their own detriment.
They are willing to get abused by a toxic Chad just because he's good looking. Women need to be reined in a bit for their own good.
Both men and women would benefit from patriarchy.
These 'feelings' wouldn't be possible anyway, as they're reserved only for chads.
Not even for Chads, they dump them easily when something happens to them (e.g. a car crash, a disease) and they lose their looks. So whatever they feel towards them should not be called "love."
You are right, it's lust.
Bingo.
yu ar e misacınist
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
