VST
Banned
-
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2017
- Posts
- 5,739
- Online
- 0
It's obvious that no one wants to see us in public, so should we spare them the hassle?
We could start a religion with tradition similar to those of Islam where women are forced to wear a Niqab to prevent men from wanting to engage in sexual acts with them, but in our case it would be to conceal the opposite, it would be used to conceal our subhumanity.
The only problem would be the fact that we would be asked to take them off, but if we managed to form a religion around it no one would be able to tell us to remove our balaclavas as that would be grounds for discrimination, obviously this wouldn't work in some european nations as demonstrated by some european nations banning face veils etc. but It could work in the UK if we met a few criteria as per section 2(2)(c) of the Charities Act 2006:
I'd imagine that we already meet the third one.
For the fourth we could just state that we do it for the benefit of the public and to maintain other's "positive worldview" and we would only commit to share our personal suffering in private conversations as it could prove damaging to society as a whole and could destabilise men's will/motivation to work and thus crash the economy (nobody listens anyways but we can still use it). We would refrain from any kind of degeneracy and we wouldn't allow lust to take over at any point. We'd be like the masked tibetan monks, taking on a vow of suffering as everything in this world is a zero-sum game so someone has to suffer in order for others to be happy.
Thoughts?
We could start a religion with tradition similar to those of Islam where women are forced to wear a Niqab to prevent men from wanting to engage in sexual acts with them, but in our case it would be to conceal the opposite, it would be used to conceal our subhumanity.
The only problem would be the fact that we would be asked to take them off, but if we managed to form a religion around it no one would be able to tell us to remove our balaclavas as that would be grounds for discrimination, obviously this wouldn't work in some european nations as demonstrated by some european nations banning face veils etc. but It could work in the UK if we met a few criteria as per section 2(2)(c) of the Charities Act 2006:
- Belief in a god or gods, goddess or goddesses, supreme being or divine or transcendental being or entity or spiritual principle which is the object or focus of the religion
- A relationship between the believer nd supreme being or entity by showing worship of reverence or veneration of the supreme being or entity
- a degree of cogency cohesion seriousness and importance
- An identifiable positive beneficial moral or ethical framework.
I'd imagine that we already meet the third one.
For the fourth we could just state that we do it for the benefit of the public and to maintain other's "positive worldview" and we would only commit to share our personal suffering in private conversations as it could prove damaging to society as a whole and could destabilise men's will/motivation to work and thus crash the economy (nobody listens anyways but we can still use it). We would refrain from any kind of degeneracy and we wouldn't allow lust to take over at any point. We'd be like the masked tibetan monks, taking on a vow of suffering as everything in this world is a zero-sum game so someone has to suffer in order for others to be happy.
Thoughts?
