A
Reason I ask this is because the underlying issue for all of us here is hypergamy, 1) a femoid created the term "incel," and as we know, females are not even close to being in any of our situations. 2) There is a lot of fuss over what contributes an "incel" with all the diehard truecels suggesting that if you got laid once 20 yrs ago, or if your a normal looking guy who isn't able to fuck a 450 lb toothless deformity case, you're a "failed normie" (which IMO is kinda dumb because if we wanna go that route, how many of those guys are unwilling to fuck a gay guy? Does that make them volcel, or a "failed normie"?)... I have nothing against truecels (especially the less judgemental ones) and yes, they do have it harder, I'd imagine from their perspective they had to get over any degree of physical attraction as they are the lowest of the lowest ranking in physical attraction (even among us other incels). But everyone has some standard somewhere, otherwise they'd be willing to go gay.
I figure this though, we can let the diehard truecels keep the term incel, and the rest of us can move to the term "intimately deprived" which is far less strict (but clearly not larpers or fakecels), it's a win/win.
I figure this though, we can let the diehard truecels keep the term incel, and the rest of us can move to the term "intimately deprived" which is far less strict (but clearly not larpers or fakecels), it's a win/win.
Last edited:
