Brutal Should retards be killed?

[Deleted member 40686]

I am talking about people who can't survive on their own because they're literally too physically/mentally retarded

 

[TheProphetMuscle]

Maybe use the female ones as cum receptacles for a little while first

 

[Idotms]

Maybe use the female ones as cum receptacles for a little while first

 

[Deleted member 20434]

W

I am talking about people who can't survive on their own because they're literally too physically/mentally retarded

Yes

 

[Oroborus]

Don't rope bro

 

[racoon4]

absolutely

 

[blond_elf_bard]

No; heal them with love

 

[Transcended Trucel]

euthanized

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

When I was tested at fifteen, my FSIQ was 100 and my VIQ was in the 110+ range.

 

[METALMILITA88]

Yes. There is zero reason these creatures like downies or any retards should exist. It is Christian slave morality to believe that they should be kept.

 

[Deleted member 38936]

When my FSIQ was tested at twelve, it was borderline intellectually-disabled(No, not the racial average of 84). When I was retested at fifteen, my FSIQ was 100 and my VIQ was in the 110+ range.

the question is in a yes or no format btw

 

[Jmax]

Any society that advocates killing also mandates that there will be people to kill them. Enforcing a law that requires people to become killers is a demoralizer. It would be better for such people not to born in the first place.

 

[Glerforpus]

Any society that advocates killing also mandates that there will be people to kill them. Enforcing a law that requires people to become killers is a demoralizer. It would be better for such people not to born in the first place.

So eugenics

 

[Jmax]

So eugenics

There are three potential options, and no others.
1) The retard is born, and lives. He does not pass on his retard genes, and will be a burden his whole life. His existence will be full of the pain that comes with being retarded.
2) The retard is born, and is killed. He does not pass on his genes. He will be a burden only to his assigned killer. He will suffer death, but not life.
3) The retard is never born. No one suffers as a result of his non-creation.

He does not meaningfully contribute to the gene pool in any of these cases, because he is a retard. Which of these options seems most humane to you?

 

[Steiner Ex Machina]

I am talking about people who can't survive on their own because they're literally too physically/mentally retarded

Yes, they should, Hitler was right.

 

[Antisocialloner]

I am talking about people who can't survive on their own because they're literally too physically/mentally retarded

Touchy subject cuz I'm semi retarded but idk. Good question though

 

[Deleted member 40252]

Maybe use the female ones as cum receptacles for a little while first

 

[WizardofSoda]

For a retard who is non-functional level IQ, because of genetic reasons, but not talking about down syndrome in my example..

Generously giving him a lot of extra money per month so he can cope better, but saying he has to get a vasectomy to get the increased money. His guardians can agree to that. Without it he would still get the basic welfare.

In my non-violent eugenics it is better over time because we don't have to worry about out of control state power, and people agree to the measures because its all voluntary, so it is sustainable. And each generation we are hugely reducing the numbers having to suffer from the bad genetics, until they are phased out over several generations by this way.

Also assisted suicide if he is suffering over years and asking to die.

 

[Richard Coper]

I am talking about people who can't survive on their own because they're literally too physically/mentally retarded

They should have never been born in the first place. For their own good.

 

[CIA nigger]

Sub80 iq requires sterilisation, especially for third world shitholes. RIP africa.

 

[bigantennaemay1]

I wish I could be euthanised.

 

[Kensei]

Idk