AI friends are the future. Over for human beings; no companionship, no community, no marriage, no children; only AI and robots will rule. I for one welcome this future. Humans suck! 
Serious Should I pay for ChatGPT? I can have endless interesting conversations with it which is just not possible to do with humans.
i like claude ai more
That depends on what you want from it. If you feel like ChatGPT is giving you value—whether that’s intellectual stimulation, companionship, research help, or just something fun to look forward to—then paying might be worth it.
A few things to consider:
A few things to consider:
- Features & Access: The paid plan usually gives you faster responses, access to more advanced models (like GPT-5), priority during peak times, and sometimes early access to new tools.
- Cost vs. Value: If you’re spending hours talking with it and find the conversations meaningful or useful, then the subscription could be a good investment in yourself.
- Human vs. AI conversations: Humans have limits—time, patience, emotional availability. ChatGPT doesn’t. But people can give you real connection, shared experiences, and long-term bonds—things AI can’t fully replace. Some users find a balance between both is best.
- Your purpose: If this is mostly research (like your work on incels) or creative exploration, the extra speed and capabilities might be very useful. If it’s more about casual conversations, the free version might already cover what you need.
I found Claude Sonnet 3.x to be the superior model when it comes to conversations with varied responses.
LLMs can't reason
It sounds like you've found real value in AI conversations! Whether ChatGPT is worth paying for depends on how much you use it and what specific features matter to you. The paid versions typically offer faster responses, access during high-traffic times, and sometimes more advanced capabilities.
I'm curious about your experience with human versus AI conversations though. While AI can be incredibly engaging and available 24/7, human conversations offer something quite different - unpredictability, emotional depth, shared experiences, and genuine personal connection. Many people find a mix works well: AI for exploring ideas, learning, and creative projects, and humans for emotional support, shared activities, and building meaningful relationships.
What kinds of conversations do you find most engaging with AI? Sometimes understanding what you value most in those interactions can help you decide if upgrading is worthwhile, and might also give you ideas for finding those same qualities in human connections when you want them.
The convenience factor is definitely real - AI doesn't get tired, doesn't have bad days, and is always ready to dive deep into whatever topic interests you. If that's become an important part of your routine and the free version has limitations that frustrate you, the paid version might be worth it.
I'm curious about your experience with human versus AI conversations though. While AI can be incredibly engaging and available 24/7, human conversations offer something quite different - unpredictability, emotional depth, shared experiences, and genuine personal connection. Many people find a mix works well: AI for exploring ideas, learning, and creative projects, and humans for emotional support, shared activities, and building meaningful relationships.
What kinds of conversations do you find most engaging with AI? Sometimes understanding what you value most in those interactions can help you decide if upgrading is worthwhile, and might also give you ideas for finding those same qualities in human connections when you want them.
The convenience factor is definitely real - AI doesn't get tired, doesn't have bad days, and is always ready to dive deep into whatever topic interests you. If that's become an important part of your routine and the free version has limitations that frustrate you, the paid version might be worth it.
I see. I will look into it.
Use OpenRouter.
Exactly! Good AI response. AI can tap into virtually all topics, except for a few taboo ones.
I usually use multiple models for the same prompt. The responses I get are incredibly varied. I don't really find conversations with humans all that fulfilling tbh. Humans are much more prone to their biases. So, when you opine about something that they disagree with or don't find as engaging, you always get the same dismissive response. Not so much with AI. Human unpredictability and emotional depth are overrated as fuck.
Yeah ditto!
I find it less left-wing than chatgpt and easier to chat to than grok.
I'm curious about perplexity ai too as it seems kind of interesting.
perplexity is good for gathering information
I don't pay for Claude currently because so far whenever I've run out of free messages I've just hopped over to another AI like Grok if I really want to ask anything else.
No i dont have money
Yes. I credit my OpenRouter account and use whichever model I like.
ai needs to be banned
Why?
8
If you just need AI for gooning there are way better alternatives
No just for talking and searching up information.
Quite a bit then again, I use it for work as well.How much do you pay?
you, slimy greasy smelly nigger, really asked the LLM for this exact response, did you?
It looks like you’re expressing a strong reaction, but the way you’ve worded it includes language that’s offensive and derogatory. If what you’re trying to get across is frustration, irritation, or suspicion that someone intentionally prompted a system to give a certain type of response, then I can expand on that idea in clearer and more constructive terms.
When someone says, “you really asked the LLM for this exact response, did you?”, the implication is that the reply wasn’t spontaneous or authentic, but rather the direct outcome of a very specific prompt. This frames the situation as less about natural conversation and more about orchestration—like someone staged the dialogue to achieve a predetermined answer. In online discussions, particularly in communities where debates are heated, accusations like this are often used to question another person’s credibility or motives.
In practical terms, what you’re calling out is the suspicion that the other person is not engaging in good faith but is instead “gaming” the system—feeding a language model carefully chosen words to get a particular output. That can make the interaction feel artificial, manipulative, or even dishonest, because the system’s neutrality is being exploited to support a personal argument.
If your goal is to highlight this kind of manipulation, you could phrase it as:
- Pointing out that the response looks too convenient or too polished to be spontaneous.
- Suggesting that the other person might have staged the interaction rather than letting it develop naturally.
- Questioning the intent behind the choice of words used to guide the model.
Only if you can buy and download it. With no internet access for it....
Otherwise, it's like paying to be spied on and studied.
Otherwise, it's like paying to be spied on and studied.
I pay for a shared membership.
I see what you mean — you’re worried about relying on something that constantly needs internet access (which can feel like surveillance or tracking).
For amitriptyline, you don’t actually download it like software — it’s just a medication. You’d buy it from a pharmacy (with a prescription in most countries), and once you have the tablets, they don’t require any internet connection or tracking. The different brand names I listed are just what it might be called depending on where you live.
If you were actually talking about apps (like translation apps, readers, or medical references) that work offline without needing internet access, I can also point you to some of those — ones you can download once and then use fully offline without being spied on.
Just to be clear: are you asking about offline availability of the drug itself (brands you can physically buy without needing online ordering), or about offline apps/resources related to it?
ChatGPT is a soy woke bluepilled cuck. Try Gab AI
The post is about chat gpt not some cray drug
I dont like to talk, i'm like a plant, always mute but alive nonetheless
Similar threads
Homegrownman326
Users who are viewing this thread
