[Shitpost] This Turkish streamer doesn't rely on flashing her boobs for $ betabux $

[Sleigher]

She's all about F A C E xD!!

And the gimmick of being a (fake) blonde in Turkey.

 

[shukin]

It still gets to me how people can get money and fame simply from being good looking. No personality, khunfidence or skillset needed. Life on easy-mode.

 

[Classic_Jarvis]

still a cockroach even with bleached hair

 

[hehe xd]

looks like a disgusting semite filth

turks are the epitome of chinks - so inbred with whites they can fool the average person, but after a careful examination their gook features override their white ones

---

It still gets to me how people can get money and fame simply from being good looking. No personality, khunfidence or skillset needed. Life on easy-mode.

*only applies if femoid

for males u need to actually be talented and be a 10/10 slayer

 

[Solitarian_Walker]

Heavy angle and lighting frauding.

 

[shukin]

still a cockroach even with bleached hair

Its not her fault she is good looking. Enablers is what makes this a reality, in a healty society she would be despised.

---

*only applies if femoid

for males u need to actually be talented and be a 10/10 slayer

Very wisely said.

 

[CopingGymcel]

Her mouth is asymmetrically shifted to the right of her face. Looks weird.

 

[Deleted member 306]

Ugly as fuck.

 

[rotandrise]

looks like a disgusting semite filth

turks are the epitome of chinks - so inbred with whites they can fool the average person, but after a careful examination their gook features override their white ones

---

*only applies if femoid

for males u need to actually be talented and be a 10/10 slayer

---

this tbh. A lot of turks have round,flat faces. No deep eyes, prominent browridges/cheekbones.

This guy is considered one of the most attractive turkish men.

gook genes fucked me over as well. My face is too flat.

 

[CopingGymcel]

this tbh. A lot of turks have round,flat faces. No deep eyes, prominent browridges/cheekbones.

This guy is considered one of the most attractive turkish men.

gook genes fucked me over as well. My face is too flat.

What you'll notice about most attractive ethnics, is that they look white.

 

[rotandrise]

This girl isn't even good looking. Twitch users are too autistic so they worship anything with a cunt

 

[hehe xd]

this tbh. A lot of turks have round,flat faces. No deep eyes, prominent browridges/cheekbones.

This guy is considered one of the most attractive turkish men.

gook genes fucked me over as well. My face is too flat.

im willing to bet hes considered attractive only because he has european blue eyes lmao, the white worshipping is real

 

[rotandrise]

What you'll notice about most attractive ethnics, is that they look white.

bone structure, absolutely.blonde hair and light eyes ? not really.At least not in turkey. The guy above is the only blonde turkish slayer I can think of.

these two are also very popular

 

[Jockcel]

JFL at Twitch users.

 

[Kointo1]

Don't give these whores money for simply existing.

 

[Solitarian_Walker]

still a cockroach even with bleached hair

Its not her fault she is good looking. Enablers is what makes this a reality, in a healty society she would be despised.

WRONG, her fakeup is good looking. Stop enabling these whores with this cuck mentality.

 

[St.Tropez]

Looks like a goddess to me. So she deserved it.

---

It still gets to me how people can get money and fame simply from being good looking. No personality, khunfidence or skillset needed. Life on easy-mode.

so what people get born ad millionared with trust funds as well. Thex make millions per year just on interest alone. 
Why should that be any more valuable than having good looks. 

Jfl at thinking life is fair.

 

[Kointo1]

Looks like a goddess to me. So she deserved it.

No.

 

[shukin]

WRONG, her fakeup is good looking. Stop enabling these whores with this cuck mentality.

Whether she looks good with or without makeup is irrelevant. The point is she does look good on those photos, and thats why men worship her like an immortal. 

To ascertain the fact that she looks good doesn't enable her in anyway. It's the act of praising her simply because of that fact which does.

 

[St.Tropez]

No.

Why not?

 

[Kointo1]

Why not?

You think someone deserves more money than another person just for existing? For doing nothing?

 

[shukin]

so what people get born ad millionared with trust funds as well. Thex make millions per year just on interest alone. 
Why should that be any more valuable than having good looks. 

Jfl at thinking life is fair.

You are stating two very different scenarios. 

People who are born into wealthy families do that solely out of sheer luck. In the other scenario society has made a direct choice to make an individual famous, simply because of that individual's inherent genetics. Society has conformed to acclaim good looking people, and disapprove of less unfortunate. We are comparing randomized luck with positive reinforcement dependent on humans with free will. 

Jfl at thinking humans are not sophisticated enough to sustain a fair-minded society.

 

[St.Tropez]

You are stating two very different scenarios. 

People who are born into wealthy families do that solely out of sheer luck. In the other scenario society has made a direct choice to make an individual famous, simply because of that individual's inherent genetics. Society has conformed to acclaim good looking people, and disapprove of less unfortunate. We are comparing randomized luck with positive reinforcement dependent on humans with free will. 

Jfl at thinking humans are not sophisticated enough to sustain a fair-minded society.

Society is also making a choice in allowing someone to be born rich. You could veey well not allow inheriting anything,and it makes 100 times more sense to reward beautiful people (good genes) than just randomly borned rich people. 
Both of them are "unfair" (jfl at this concept of fair).

And besides it not even society,it is pure biology.

---

You think someone deserves more money than another person just for existing? For doing nothing?

Yes,why not? 
It is how life is. Some people get born without needing to work at all,while others work as slaves their entire lives. 
In the end nobody obviously deserves anything,but it is simply given to some. 

A question for you. Dont you think I DESERVE a gf after approaching 1000s of women? In the end I didn't get one,so it seems I dont deserve it at all. While I know Chads who get gfs for free,no effort needed on their part. So you tell me.who deserves it,me or the Chad whp.actually got her.

 

[FeminismsCancer]

this tbh. A lot of turks have round,flat faces. No deep eyes, prominent browridges/cheekbones.

This guy is considered one of the most attractive turkish men.

gook genes fucked me over as well. My face is too flat.

Damn, men who are considered hot ALWAYS have that thick lush hair, even more hair density than the females who are into them.

 

[Deleted member 2299]

It still gets to me how people can get money and fame simply from being good looking. No personality, khunfidence or skillset needed. Life on easy-mode.

Being female is life on easy mode

 

[shukin]

Society is also making a choice in allowing someone to be born rich. You could veey well not allow inheriting anything,and it makes 100 times more sense to reward beautiful people (good genes) than just randomly borned rich people. 
Both of them are "unfair" (jfl at this concept of fair).

And besides it not even society,it is pure biology.

People have money which they can spend at their own discretion. If someone wants to make another person a millionaire that is the choise of that individual, not a coherent notion from society all together. Our present society is established on consumerism and capitalism and will for this reason not limit an individuals opportunity to spend or give money (apart from a select amount of things: drugs, guns etc). Once again, society doesn't "choose" to reward rich people, they reward themselves. 

Both of them are "unfair" (jfl at this concept of fair).

I agree with you here. I simply want to give emphasis on the fact that one of the "unfairs" is based on luck whilst the other one is based on direct imput from other humans. Can you discern the difference?

And besides it not even society,it is pure biology.

Yes, looks are indeed pure biology. Society is founded and consists of humans which are driven by biological instincts. But then again don't you think we are civilized and sophisticated enough to renounce our impulse to worship and admire good looking people? I mean we have prisons to punish people who succumb to their deep-rooted primitive behaviour, and schools also somewhat serve this purpose. 

I'm strongly of the belief that humans in general could give ugly and pretty people an even playing field.

 

[Framecel222]

Came into this thread expecting Cenk Uygur, left disappointed.

 

[Kointo1]

Came into this thread expecting Cenk Uygur, left disappointed.

TYT

 

[Allblueeeee]

bone structure, absolutely.blonde hair and light eyes ? not really.At least not in turkey. The guy above is the only blonde turkish slayer I can think of.

these two are also very popular

bro kenan imirzalioglu isnt objectively attractive. He is a 7/10 4 sure but wouldnt slay rly in the western.
But Burak Özcivit is easily top0.1% worldwide in terms of looks. He would be also in scandinavian countries in top1%

There are better ethnic lookings who arent white like:

-Sükrü Özyildiz

-Serkan Cayoglu

-Baris Arduc

They would never ever be considered as white. They are just handsome. Beeing handsome doesnt make somebody white wtf

 

[anincelforlifelol]

Ugly ass bitch.

 

[Framecel222]

TYT

[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsVONO75utI[/video]

Watch this if you haven't, it's one of the funniest videos I've ever seen.

 

[St.Tropez]

People have money which they can spend at their own discretion. If someone wants to make another person a millionaire that is the choise of that individual, not a coherent notion from society all together. Our present society is established on consumerism and capitalism and will for this reason not limit an individuals opportunity to spend or give money (apart from a select amount of things: drugs, guns etc). Once again, society doesn't "choose" to reward rich people, they reward themselves. 

People are giving streamers money freely. There is no coercion. Nor is there any fundamental difference giving money to your son or random twitch streamers.

Both the rich millionare,and the beautful stramer inherently deserve it cause they were given by willing participants. 

And society does chose to reward the rich people,historicaly there have been many other ways of inheriting,so society choses will someone inherit or not. In fact sometimes the inheritance was decided by murder,you would have sons kill each other to decide who gets it,and that is a choice as well.

 

[Kointo1]

[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsVONO75utI[/video]

Watch this if you haven't, it's one of the funniest videos I've ever seen.

"No...white straight male....needs an AK-15"

AR-15 + AK-47= AK-15

lmao at the video. They talk and act exactly like them.

 

[shukin]

People are giving streamers money freely. There is no coercion. Nor is there any fundamental difference giving money to your son or random twitch streamers.

As a parent you are liable to provide for you children until they reach 18 years of age. The difference is obligation vs choice.

Both the rich millionare,and the beautful stramer inherently deserve it cause they were given by willing participants. 

I don't talk against this. However, the streamer's supposed beauty could be a mere conjunction. Coincidence does not imply causation. 

My point is; if the streamer is beautiful and given money for this reason - and for this reason only - it is a clear example of good looking people enjoying privileges on the direct will of other humans. This unfairness is not based on luck and could be erased.

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]And society does chose to reward the rich people,historicaly there have been many other ways of inheriting,so society choses will someone inherit or not. In fact sometimes the inheritance was decided by murder,[/font][font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]you would have sons kill each other to decide who gets it[/font][font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif],and that is a choice as well. 

[/font]
[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]That sounds pretty interesting, but nonetheless is it obsolete. Society does not encourage murder. Anyone chosing to murder a relative in order to inherit money does so at their own will. You decide who will acquire you belongings post-mortem, and you do so by writing a testament. [/font]

 

[St.Tropez]

As a parent you are liable to provide for you children until they reach 18 years of age. The difference is obligation vs choice.


I don't talk against this. However, the streamer's supposed beauty could be a mere conjunction. Coincidence does not imply causation. 

My point is; if the streamer is beautiful and given money for this reason - and for this reason only - it is a clear example of good looking people enjoying privileges on the direct will of other humans. This unfairness is not based on luck and could be erased.

[/font]
[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]That sounds pretty interesting, but nonetheless is it obsolete. Society does not encourage murder. Anyone chosing to murder a relative in order to inherit money does so at their own will. You decide who will acquire you belongings post-mortem, and you do so by writing a testament. [/font]

So what is your point in the end? Sounds like you are agreeing with me. Beauty is luck same as being born rich. 
In fact it is almost identical as it drawa from genes. Son is lucky and  is given money for having right genes,ie born from the right father. Or son is lucky and born beautiful. Both are the same.

 

[shukin]

So what is your point in the end? Sounds like you are agreeing with me. Beauty is luck same as being born rich. 
In fact it is almost identical as it drawa from genes. Son is lucky and  is given money for having right genes,ie born from the right father. Or son is lucky and born beautiful. Both are the same.

I do agree; both are based on luck - just like everything else. 

So what is your point in the end?

1. That the only reason beatuiful people are considered lucky is because fellow human beings decide to give them advantages, immunity and praise. It is an active choice from people and society to give them a better life.

2. That people who inherit a substantial amount of money are lucky, not because society tends to them, but rather because they won a randomized lottery at birth. 

These scenarios differ in the sense that the first one is caused directly by humans and the other one indirectly. Choice(1) vs coincidence(2).

 

[theultimate341]

JFL at Twitch users.

 

[St.Tropez]

I do agree; both are based on luck - just like everything else. 


1. That the only reason beatuiful people are considered lucky is because fellow human beings decide to give them advantages, immunity and praise. It is an active choice from people and society to give them a better life.

2. That people who inherit a substantial amount of money are lucky, not because society tends to them, but rather because they won a randomized lottery at birth. 

These scenarios differ in the sense that the first one is caused directly by humans and the other one indirectly. Choice(1) vs coincidence(2).

You are wrong because yoh are missing the point that father decides to give money to son. In some.cases he also decides against it and spends it,or maybe gives to his ex wife. 
Inheriting also has a choice component in 99% of the cases.
And that also inheriting is something people decided to do,it is not an universal pprinciple. If one day your father decided to not leave you anything,there is very little you could do about it. 

In fact beautful children are more likely to inherit because parents usually have favorite and disfavorite children. So in my family my father will get nothing while his sister will get multiple estates because their mother likes the sister more. And my father cannot do anything about it.

---

*and also these are all very minor points as we are essentially arguing for something really simmilar.

 

[mikepence]

I do agree; both are based on luck - just like everything else.
1. That the only reason beatuiful people are considered lucky is because fellow human beings decide to give them advantages, immunity and praise. It is an active choice from people and society to give them a better life.
2. That people who inherit a substantial amount of money are lucky, not because society tends to them, but rather because they won a randomized lottery at birth.
These scenarios differ in the sense that the first one is caused directly by humans and the other one indirectly. Choice(1) vs coincidence(2).

You are wrong because yoh are missing the point that father decides to give money to son. In some.cases he also decides against it and spends it,or maybe gives to his ex wife.
Inheriting also has a choice component in 99% of the cases.
And that also inheriting is something people decided to do,it is not an universal pprinciple. If one day your father decided to not leave you anything,there is very little you could do about it.
In fact beautful children are more likely to inherit because parents usually have favorite and disfavorite children. So in my family my father will get nothing while his sister will get multiple estates because their mother likes the sister more. And my father cannot do anything about it.

Yeah "fairness" doesn't exist but I just don't give a shit. I don't like the psychopathic selective nature of women and that's all I need to hate them. Neither we nor Chad really "deserve" shit, but why should we support Chad?

 

[St.Tropez]

Yeah "fairness" doesn't exist but I just don't give a shit. I don't like the psychopathic selective nature of women and that's all I need to  hate them. Neither we nor Chad really "deserve" shit, but why should we support Chad?

Nobody is forcing you to donate money to him,or support him. 
People are willingly giving him money and support.

 

[mikepence]

Yeah "fairness" doesn't exist but I just don't give a shit. I don't like the psychopathic selective nature of women and that's all I need to hate them. Neither we nor Chad really "deserve" shit, but why should we support Chad?

Nobody is forcing you to donate money to him,or support him.
People are willingly giving him money and support.

Yeah, people are willingly giving him money, but for an attribute he got from being born, so he "deserves" it, and he doesn't "deserve" it. I just don't like it because lookist stuff like this hurts me just for existing, and I will never support something that, it's basically axiomatic for me. My point is, they can consent to giving Chad all their money, but I would have no problem with making it illegal and stopping lookism if I became an omnipotent dictator tomorrow

 

[St.Tropez]

Yeah, people are willingly giving him money, but for an attribute he got from being born, so he "deserves" it, and he doesn't "deserve" it. I just don't like it because lookist stuff like this hurts me just for existing, and I will never support something that, it's basically axiomatic for me. My point is, they can consent to giving Chad all their money, but I would have no problem with making it illegal and stopping lookism if I became an omnipotent dictator tomorrow

I am sure you wouldn't even about such things if you were a omnipotent dictator,but whatever.

 

[saddupbro]

stop saying she's ugly, she's hot and you'd smash her in a heartbeat.

she's just ugly on the inside.

---

Looks like a goddess to me. So she deserved it.

you deserve death, St. Tropez

---

WRONG, her fakeup is good looking. Stop enabling these whores with this cuck mentality.

eh, they were saying the same thing as you.

 

[St.Tropez]

you deserve death, St. Tropez

Oh great,give it to me. I honesty couldn't imagine a better gift.