Yes, that's true, and I can't take "sexualization" and "harassment" seriously after knowing that, because those words mean NOTHING. If you look good, women are going to like it if you touch them, but if you're ugly, they are going to be uncomfortable and making a woman uncomfortable is harassment according to society, but at the end of the day, the action itself is the same, the difference is how they react to the action, not the action itself, so the action of touching women is not bad, harassment depends on the SUBJECTIVITY of women, because it depends on their subjective interpretation of uncomfort.
If a feminist roastie sees this, she's going to say that the difference is "consent" and that the first guy had the consent to do that, but consent can be very subjective and misinterpretable if it's not written in a contract to sign or if at least it isn't verbal and explicit, so putting consent as a parameter to see if a man deserves to go to jail is dangerous.
