Blackpill SexCommodityPill: "The price of sex"

[Deleted member 10124]

The Price of Sex: Women Rule, Men Drool, the Market's Cruel

Surprising insights from the new field of sexual economics.

www.psychologytoday.com

So sex is a commodity and Tradeable service but the market has been fucked with ever since late Noughties aka 2008.

Who knew right.

All becoming clear Brothers.

Ps. I'm going to turn this into another mega thread.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Sexual economics - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Social exchange theory - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Its a collation of sources.

 

[Deleted member 24876]

>A woman’s sexual consent is a valuable asset that may command a high price. Because his sex has no value in the market, the man, seeking to 'purchase' female sex, is required to bring other valuable social resources to the transaction, such as attention, time, love, respect, commitment, money, status, etc.

This article unintentionally does a good job in debunking the myth of "femcels", when demand for foids exceeds supply thanks to hypergamy foids, men will be willing to date ugly foids because they wont be able to get their looks match(equilibrium)

 

[AnonAutist]

Sex is not so much a commodity but a service, and there is definitely a market for it.

Difference Between Goods and Services (with Comparison Chart) - Key Differences

The basic difference between goods and services is that when the buyer purchases the goods by paying the consideration, the ownership of goods moves from the seller to the buyer. Conversely, the ownership of services is non-transferable.

keydifferences.com

Whatever SJWs may claim. When researchers taught a bunch of monkeys the concept of money, it only took a little while for female prostitute monkeys to appear. What is so fascinating today is how many (intermediate) forms of prostitution there are today: from basic street level prostitution, to high class escorting, to sugardaddying, to golddigger marriages.

How scientists taught monkeys the concept of money. Not long after, the first prostitute monkey appeared

Seriously, what the heck?

www.zmescience.com

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Sex is not so much a commodity but a service, and there is definitely a market for it.

Difference Between Goods and Services (with Comparison Chart) - Key Differences

The basic difference between goods and services is that when the buyer purchases the goods by paying the consideration, the ownership of goods moves from the seller to the buyer. Conversely, the ownership of services is non-transferable.

keydifferences.com

Whatever SJWs may claim. When researchers taught a bunch of monkeys the concept of money, it only took a little while for female prostitute monkeys to appear. What is so fascinating today is how many (intermediate) forms of prostitution there are today: from basic street level prostitution, to high class escorting, to sugardaddying, to golddigger marriages.

How scientists taught monkeys the concept of money. Not long after, the first prostitute monkey appeared

Seriously, what the heck?

www.zmescience.com

It's a Commodities- Service to be more specific.

Ps. Penguins practice prostitution or so I've read.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

View: https://twitter.com/sandpitsquirtal/status/1267986522466406401?s=20

So if you earn something or trade something against it and you get nothing or short changed then by right you feel entitled to what you're missing out on?

Am I missing something here????

View: https://twitter.com/sandpitsquirtal/status/1267976181552480257?s=20


*waves*

So you see. If we're told to put in emotional labour and physical labour on the assumption that we'd get rewarded & thereby repeat those actions with the same person and we get nothing. Man. You'd be pissed.

Ps. Still not advocating forceful "reconquista" just so you paranoid fools love to think.

 

[WarriorSkull]

View: https://twitter.com/sandpitsquirtal/status/1267986522466406401?s=20


View attachment 332421

So if you earn something or trade something against it and you get nothing or short changed then by right you feel entitled to what you're missing out on?

Am I missing something here????

View: https://twitter.com/sandpitsquirtal/status/1267976181552480257?s=20


*waves*View attachment 332422
So you see. If we're told to put in emotional labour and physical labour on the assumption that we'd get rewarded & thereby repeat those actions with the same person and we get nothing. Man. You'd be pissed.

Ps. Still not advocating forceful "reconquista" just so you paranoid fools love to think.

Socializing with women is more like a casino than a market. Odds stacked heavily against you and the house always wins. At least casinos don’t have the audacity to posture as having some moral high ground.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Socializing with women is more like a casino than a market. Odds stacked heavily against you and the house always wins. At least casinos don’t have the audacity to posture as having some moral high ground.

Best analogy I've seen to date.

 

[grondilu]

Quite a good article. My favorite paragraph is :

"What makes female sex so valuable? The ultimate reason lies with evolution. Evolutionarily speaking, man's investment in the sexual act and the risk he is taking are minimal. On the other hand, his pleasure (orgasm) is guaranteed, and each sexual encounter increases his chances for more offspring. The female’s investment in a sexual act and the risk she is taking are in contrast very high (the risk of death from complications of pregnancy or childbirth), her pleasure is not guaranteed, and having sex with multiple men does not increase her chances of getting more offspring. Therefore, sex for men is a no-risk/high-profit investment. For woman, the equation is reversed. Thus, the supply of female interest in sex is reduced, and since male demand is high, the price rises."

It's literally the first time I read a normie acknowledging this, especially the part about the risk associated with childbirth. He expressed it very well too, that kind of makes me jelly, ngl.

I think the only thing that's missing in the article is the 80/20 rule, or how some men have intrinsic sexual value and thus don't have to trade any resource for sexual access to females, and how this fact, when combined with female promiscuity, makes the market very difficult to enter for many men.

An other nice paragraph is the one about prostitution :

"In addition, the theory posits that men, given their position as consumers in the market, will seek to lower the price of sex. The inherent interest of female asset owners, however, is to raise the price. According to this analysis, the concepts of ‘free love' will be adopted by men more vigorously than by women. Women on the other hand will mobilize more vigorously to fight against pornography and prostitution because these institutions allow man easy accessibility to female sex and thus reduce the value of the property."

Though I don't quite understand why anyone would mix pornography into that. Pornography is more like advertisment than actual trade.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

View: https://twitter.com/alt_uscbp/status/1302447322635395074?s=20



View: https://twitter.com/sandpitsquirtal/status/1302449652650913793?s=20


So how are physically ugly guys supposed to get sex?

Saying "bro don't worry about sex, you're not entitled to it, do this that or the other (aka do x get y ie earning something), be a good person (see previous statement)"

Aren't really answers. I'm afraid to say.

The seller aka women who gives sex doesn't have to earn anything. Fyi.

 

[Twinkcel]

Very good read. Thank you.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

View: https://twitter.com/PornPanic/status/1314594029225603072?s=20