inb4 "didn't read lol" read the summary in big letters at the end boyo 
Here I'm not talking about sex slavery that is a branch of international organized crime, which should have been shut down, as any other kind of slavery, by all the states of the world long ago, but isn't, because sex as a commodity based on human exploitation is just like illegal drugs, a cheap way to obtain a relative social tranquility for the elite.
I'm talking about pro legalization prostitution lobbies that pretend that prostitution is an empowering statement or whatever in order to make a point towards degenerate leftists, thus having the audacity to pretend having sex is a career, extending the market to the affective/sexual spheres, dehumanizing the most private parts of human existence.
Most prostitution advocates would say that some ppl might be against prostitution because of some sort of supposed moral bigotry stating that you shouldn't get paid for a pleasant activity, or in other words that real work can only be caracterized by some sort of suffering. That is false because most pleasant activities might earn good wages (professional sport, acting, streaming, ...) without generating the same kind of opposition. In fact, the moral condemnation of prostitution has nothing to do with bigotry, because pretending escort is a real job is simply as stupid as pretending that breathing air should get you paid.
The main question to know if something is a real job is : would you do it for free ?
Take the example of a factory worker. This is undoubtedly a real job, because nobody in his right mind would spend so much time, risk his health and waste his skill doing such an activity without some sort of compensation. This is the most evident example of a real work.
Take the example of a professional footballer. This one is more subtle, because even though you might want to do play football for free, you wouldn't be able to do it on a pro level, as it requires level technicity and athleticism that you probably didn't reach at this point in your life : the objective gap in required skills make it a real work.
Now let's try with sex work. Consider that most independant sex workers who aren't desperate crackheads don't have sex with anyone that would poke at their door, they actually pick their clients and only keep the highest quality as their regular. In fact, they always end up having sex with ppl they would eventually have tried for free on their spare time, if they had a real job instead of sex "work". In this situation, "would you do this for free" can be reformulated as "would you fuck this [foid you find midly attractive] for free ?"
As the answer should be quite obvious for you, here you can see the problem : would you have the audacity to claim a sum of money if a midly attractive foid was interested in having sex with you without ambiguity ? That is what "sex work" is. In fact, venal feminism sees this as an empowering move, but should society suffer from their anti social delirium for the sake of their distorted view of what power is ?
And that's where you see why escortcels aren't real incels. If a foid "sex worker" does accept to have sex with them, among all the other sollicitations they get, and after they picked the most attractive profiles of the lot, that means that foids consider them as dating material.
to sum up:
BAN ALL ESCORTCELS ON SIGHT
Here I'm not talking about sex slavery that is a branch of international organized crime, which should have been shut down, as any other kind of slavery, by all the states of the world long ago, but isn't, because sex as a commodity based on human exploitation is just like illegal drugs, a cheap way to obtain a relative social tranquility for the elite.
I'm talking about pro legalization prostitution lobbies that pretend that prostitution is an empowering statement or whatever in order to make a point towards degenerate leftists, thus having the audacity to pretend having sex is a career, extending the market to the affective/sexual spheres, dehumanizing the most private parts of human existence.
Most prostitution advocates would say that some ppl might be against prostitution because of some sort of supposed moral bigotry stating that you shouldn't get paid for a pleasant activity, or in other words that real work can only be caracterized by some sort of suffering. That is false because most pleasant activities might earn good wages (professional sport, acting, streaming, ...) without generating the same kind of opposition. In fact, the moral condemnation of prostitution has nothing to do with bigotry, because pretending escort is a real job is simply as stupid as pretending that breathing air should get you paid.
The main question to know if something is a real job is : would you do it for free ?
Take the example of a factory worker. This is undoubtedly a real job, because nobody in his right mind would spend so much time, risk his health and waste his skill doing such an activity without some sort of compensation. This is the most evident example of a real work.
Take the example of a professional footballer. This one is more subtle, because even though you might want to do play football for free, you wouldn't be able to do it on a pro level, as it requires level technicity and athleticism that you probably didn't reach at this point in your life : the objective gap in required skills make it a real work.
Now let's try with sex work. Consider that most independant sex workers who aren't desperate crackheads don't have sex with anyone that would poke at their door, they actually pick their clients and only keep the highest quality as their regular. In fact, they always end up having sex with ppl they would eventually have tried for free on their spare time, if they had a real job instead of sex "work". In this situation, "would you do this for free" can be reformulated as "would you fuck this [foid you find midly attractive] for free ?"
As the answer should be quite obvious for you, here you can see the problem : would you have the audacity to claim a sum of money if a midly attractive foid was interested in having sex with you without ambiguity ? That is what "sex work" is. In fact, venal feminism sees this as an empowering move, but should society suffer from their anti social delirium for the sake of their distorted view of what power is ?
And that's where you see why escortcels aren't real incels. If a foid "sex worker" does accept to have sex with them, among all the other sollicitations they get, and after they picked the most attractive profiles of the lot, that means that foids consider them as dating material.
to sum up:
BAN ALL ESCORTCELS ON SIGHT
