Serious Sex-IQ gap: A meta-analysis

[cathuluelitist]

Parra-Kirkegaard just published a meta-analysis and mapped a sex-IQ gap of 2.57 IQ in favor of men. Richard Lynn's hypothesis was also validated here (Lynn vindication AGAIN), with male IQ mapping an even large advantage against women as they age.

Just goes to show that the weak and inferior are only ever empowered when the ruling class is either destroyed or replaced. When the corrupted ruling class autogenocides and replaces meritocratic and systematic IQ with social, psychopathic manipulation, you get the gynocracy.

https://openpsych.net/files/papers/Parra_2026a.pdf

(The article is free.)

 

[cathuluelitist]

Mostly water but it's now mapped in serious academia.

 

[Aventador]

Thanks for publishing.
A 2-3 points difference is really insignificant in my eyes.
What matters more is how the brain thinks.

 

[Caichan]

What matters more is how the brain thinks.

Practical and logical vs whatever goes on in their head

 

[cathuluelitist]

Thanks for publishing.
A 2-3 points difference is really insignificant in my eyes.
What matters more is how the brain thinks.

Fair but the confirmation of the cognitive gap in academe is the first step in deconstructing the current ideology and getting deeper into it all.

 

[cathuluelitist]

It also skyrockets as men age, which says a lot. Mainly, the point of the thread, that I forgot to purvey was the fact that current academe isn't even engaging en masse with this, given the current consensus is that the average man and the average woman have the same cognition rate and that just a few decades ago, there would be widespread rebuttal and affirmation. This also opens a door to further sex difference talk in the chattering class which is amazing of course.

Practical and logical vs whatever goes on in their head

 

[Sir Silentium]

Only 2.57? It would have to be higher than that, surely. I recon an estimation of around 10 would be more accurate on average.

 

[Izayacel]

If man would just start regulating Woman , and Replace People in Power with more Emphatic Potential Leaders .

eh

 

[cathuluelitist]

Only 2.57? It would have to be higher than that, surely. I recon an estimation of around 10 would be more accurate on average.

I imagine it increases en masse as a man ages but it's very hard to sample that though Lynn seemed to suggest it.

 

[cathuluelitist]

The importance here is the path it will forge in academics