Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Serious question: Is he a pedophile in this scenario?

Ignas

Ignas

Generalfeldmarschall
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Posts
6,214
When a man tries to get into sexual and romantic relationship with teen girls (16-18 years), they're considered pedophiles. he'll get labeled as creepy and predators for getting horny with a child. But as we know, girls start to have sex early these days.

But here I imagine if a virgin man who never had sexual relationship in his life dates and have sex with a 17 yo girl who has 4 body counts. Is he a pedophile? Is he creepy? Is he a predator? Society would say he is but I don't see why tbh. The girl is more experienced than him. He's more innocent than her when it comes to sex. If anything, it's her who would teach him a thing or two that would please a girl in bed. If she's a pure virgin then yeah I can accept that logic of him staining her life and teaching her dirty things, somehow. In my opinion, it can't be considered pedophile to have sex with 16-18 yo teens who already have sex with boyfriends before.

What do you guys think?
 
Laws = morals in a democracy
 
Well technically he's a ephebophile because he likes 16-18 year olds innit
or as far as I know
 
In the past it was perfectly normal to marry 13 yo foids, as long as she entered puberty I see no problem. Also hi cucktears.
28535002-79bf-475a-8375-6008c9007381-jpeg.205660
 
no he isn't a pedophile. Pedophilia is a predominant sexual attraction to prepubescent children. And you don't need to be 18 to be a pedophile, you have to be 16. it's a psychiatric disorder and therefore the psychiatric definition is more reliable than the limited dictionary definition (look up appeal to definition). also, men who bang teens aren't necessarily ephebophiles either, some might get with teens on dates for reasons like opportunity instead of sexual attraction.
 
In the past it was perfectly normal to marry 13 yo foids, as long as she entered puberty I see no problem. Also hi cucktears.
28535002-79bf-475a-8375-6008c9007381-jpeg.205660
in ancient greece, girls at age 14/15 got married to 30 year old men. in ancient indian blackfoot tribes, 35 year old men married 15 year old girls
 
IT include me in the screenshot
 
in ancient greece, girls at age 14/15 got married to 30 year old men. in ancient indian blackfoot tribes, 35 year old men married 15 year old girls
Cucks will say it's because they weren't as civilized as today
Resultado de imagen de rasengan pepe
 
Cucks will say it's because they weren't as civilized as today
Resultado de imagen de rasengan pepe
in the future the age of consent and porn age will be raised to 21. think about it.
 
In the past it was perfectly normal to marry 13 yo foids, as long as she entered puberty I see no problem. Also hi cucktears.
28535002-79bf-475a-8375-6008c9007381-jpeg.205660
in ancient greece, girls at age 14/15 got married to 30 year old men. in ancient indian blackfoot tribes, 35 year old men married 15 year old girls
Cucks will say it's because they weren't as civilized as today
Resultado de imagen de rasengan pepe
I mean if she's more experienced, I don't see if a grown man dating teen girls (16-18) is degeneracy and should be shamed. If it's degeneracy, then teens having sex should be considered degenerate
 
No he's not. Society is just cucked that's all.
 
I'd say if you are old virgin, fuck the pussy you can get
full
 
If you look at his ugly face you will know hes a pedo
 
As far as I know, girls usually hit puberty faster than boys. Some even hit puberty as young as 10 years old and were considered women after that while boys weren't considered real men until they were like 20 or something so it used to be perfectly normal for older men to marry younger girls.
 
they call a guy who is mid 20s a pedo with a foid who is 19 these days. those cunt faggots:soy:
 
16 IS NOT PAEDOPHILIA, YOU AMERICAN TRASH
 
It's only pedophilia if you're poor and ugly.
If you're connected and have powerful friends, you'll never have a problem.
 
No. Pedophilia is being attracted to someone who has not yet gone through puberty. Most girls are 100% physically developed by the age of 16. So no, he’s good.
 
The problem is that you seem to think people's opinions on the age of consent are decided by logic or reason. In fact they are not.
 
in ancient greece, girls at age 14/15 got married to 30 year old men. in ancient indian blackfoot tribes, 35 year old men married 15 year old girls
Based. The father of Confucius was in his 70's when he knocked up an 18 year old... IT would would call the cops on him.
 
He is not a pedophile. Pedophile is some one who is attracted to small kids. 16yo foids are not kids at all. Foids don't really care if a old chad fucks them. But if a virgin low tier is attracted to them then he is labelled as a pedophile
 
When a man tries to get into sexual and romantic relationship with teen girls (16-18 years), they're considered pedophiles. he'll get labeled as creepy and predators for getting horny with a child. But as we know, girls start to have sex early these days.

But here I imagine if a virgin man who never had sexual relationship in his life dates and have sex with a 17 yo girl who has 4 body counts. Is he a pedophile? Is he creepy? Is he a predator? Society would say he is but I don't see why tbh. The girl is more experienced than him. He's more innocent than her when it comes to sex. If anything, it's her who would teach him a thing or two that would please a girl in bed. If she's a pure virgin then yeah I can accept that logic of him staining her life and teaching her dirty things, somehow. In my opinion, it can't be considered pedophile to have sex with 16-18 yo teens who already have sex with boyfriends before.

What do you guys think?
No he's not a pedophile.
If anything the girl is pedo for having sex with a virgin as a non-virgin.
 
true. the reason it's considered wrong/immoral for a 30 yr old men to have sex with a 15 yr old girl is because he is supposedly taking advantage and exploiting the innocent and can traumatise her.

but for 30 yr old incels, most 15 yr olds have more sexual experience than them, so who is it that's really getting 'exploited'?
 
true. the reason it's considered wrong/immoral for a 30 yr old men to have sex with a 15 yr old girl is because he is supposedly taking advantage and exploiting the innocent and can traumatise her.

but for 30 yr old incels, most 15 yr olds have more sexual experience than them, so who is it that's really getting 'exploited'?
15 year olds are only traumatized because of society’s reaction to the age gap NOT because of the nature of the age gap
 

Similar threads

wasteofspace
Replies
30
Views
456
BPJ
BPJ
peepo.belgrade
Replies
31
Views
534
underballer
U
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
18
Views
469
Debaser
Debaser
M
Replies
21
Views
409
Friezacel
Friezacel
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
48
Views
1K
erenyeager
erenyeager

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top