KingOfRome
Buff Auschwitz Escapee
-
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
- Posts
- 8,039
Whatever it is, be it getting a good career, going to the gym, having a good personality, or whatever else, the impact it makes on how attractive you are is directly proportional to your genetic base attractiveness, that is, how attractive you are on your own as a baseline. This is why it works for normies and up, but not for us. We don't have a good enough base for self-improvement to make a difference.
Let me illustrate.
Let's say, as a male, you need a value of 60 SMV to be competitive in the dating market at the middling level, 180 to be competitive at the top 10% class, and a minimum of 30 to participate. (These values are arbitrary, so don't get hung up over the precise numbers.)
We have three men: There's Chad, with a base of 150; Tom, with a base of 40; and Melvin, with a base of 10.
We have these multipliers:
> Positive
- Good personality x1.1
- Good physical shape x1.25
- High status x2
- Top 10th percentile income x1.5
> Negative
- Poor x.75
- Slightly below average physical shape e.g. skinnyfat x0.85
- Extremely below average shape e.g. morbidly obese or double amputee x0.5
- Bad personality x0.9
- Extreme mental illness x0.5
Let's say all three of them are high status, in good shape, and have top 10th percentile incomes, but have bad personalities.
Chad:
150 * 1.5 = 225
150 * 2 = 300
150 * 1.25 = 187.5
150 * 0.9 = 135
Now add the differences of these values, then add the solution to the base number for Chad's net SMV.
225 - 150 = 75
300 - 150 = 150
187.5 - 150 = 37.5
135 - 150 = -15
75 + 150 + 37.5 - 15 = 247.5
That is a massive number for Chad and could easily put him over the top 5th percentile without even including his base value of 150. His real SMV is a jaw-dropping 397.5.
Melvin:
10 * 1.5 = 15
10 * 1.25 = 12.5
10 * 2 = 20
10 * 0.9 = 9
15 - 10 = 5
12.5 - 10 = 2.5
20 - 10 = 10
9 - 10 = -1
5 + 2.5 + 10 - 1 = 16.5
Now add Melvin's base of 10.
10 + 16.5 = 26.5
Just shy of the absolute minimum requirement of 30. It's over for Melvin.
Tom:
40 * 1.5 = 60
40 * 1.25 = 50
40 * 2 = 80
40 * 0.9 = 36
60 - 40 = 20
50 - 40 = 10
80 - 40 = 40
36 - 40 = -4
20 + 10 + 40 - 4 = 66
This is already more than double Melvin's total SMV, but it's only in addition to Tom's base 40, whose total has become 106. Tom has gone from getting ghosted by obese single moms with rotting teeth after the first date to having a fairly decent, if far from ideal, dating life.
Self-improvement has been more valuable to Tom than it has been for Melvin, and although Chad got even more out of it on paper than Tom, in practice, Chad's base was already so high he probably didn't notice the effect too much -- the law of diminishing returns is in full effect here.
Keep this in mind when normies tell you self-improvement will improve your chances. It will, but not enough to make the difference you need to make the effort worthwhile.
Let me illustrate.
Let's say, as a male, you need a value of 60 SMV to be competitive in the dating market at the middling level, 180 to be competitive at the top 10% class, and a minimum of 30 to participate. (These values are arbitrary, so don't get hung up over the precise numbers.)
We have three men: There's Chad, with a base of 150; Tom, with a base of 40; and Melvin, with a base of 10.
We have these multipliers:
> Positive
- Good personality x1.1
- Good physical shape x1.25
- High status x2
- Top 10th percentile income x1.5
> Negative
- Poor x.75
- Slightly below average physical shape e.g. skinnyfat x0.85
- Extremely below average shape e.g. morbidly obese or double amputee x0.5
- Bad personality x0.9
- Extreme mental illness x0.5
Let's say all three of them are high status, in good shape, and have top 10th percentile incomes, but have bad personalities.
Chad:
150 * 1.5 = 225
150 * 2 = 300
150 * 1.25 = 187.5
150 * 0.9 = 135
Now add the differences of these values, then add the solution to the base number for Chad's net SMV.
225 - 150 = 75
300 - 150 = 150
187.5 - 150 = 37.5
135 - 150 = -15
75 + 150 + 37.5 - 15 = 247.5
That is a massive number for Chad and could easily put him over the top 5th percentile without even including his base value of 150. His real SMV is a jaw-dropping 397.5.
Melvin:
10 * 1.5 = 15
10 * 1.25 = 12.5
10 * 2 = 20
10 * 0.9 = 9
15 - 10 = 5
12.5 - 10 = 2.5
20 - 10 = 10
9 - 10 = -1
5 + 2.5 + 10 - 1 = 16.5
Now add Melvin's base of 10.
10 + 16.5 = 26.5
Just shy of the absolute minimum requirement of 30. It's over for Melvin.
Tom:
40 * 1.5 = 60
40 * 1.25 = 50
40 * 2 = 80
40 * 0.9 = 36
60 - 40 = 20
50 - 40 = 10
80 - 40 = 40
36 - 40 = -4
20 + 10 + 40 - 4 = 66
This is already more than double Melvin's total SMV, but it's only in addition to Tom's base 40, whose total has become 106. Tom has gone from getting ghosted by obese single moms with rotting teeth after the first date to having a fairly decent, if far from ideal, dating life.
Self-improvement has been more valuable to Tom than it has been for Melvin, and although Chad got even more out of it on paper than Tom, in practice, Chad's base was already so high he probably didn't notice the effect too much -- the law of diminishing returns is in full effect here.
Keep this in mind when normies tell you self-improvement will improve your chances. It will, but not enough to make the difference you need to make the effort worthwhile.
Last edited: