RageFuel Scientific communities are getting CUCKED.

[SLAVICMorPheus]

Year 2018 scientific publications tremble wuth the fear of sjw name calling. They do acknowledge that aesthetic is objective and quantifiable yet they deny to call it "beauty" as it might hurt the feelings of some ugly femcel who are not even minimally effected by their lack of craniofacial aesthetic.

And the lefty feminist cunts keep screeching that "Beuaty is a SoCIaL cOnZTRucT"

 

[FukkenLoser]

What a fucking word salad, where did you get this from OP?

 

[iKillCucks]

What a fucking word salad, where did you get this from OP?

Probably reddit or Tumblr

 

[FukkenLoser]

"it is important to bear in mind that any theory that cannot be directly and physically tested remains a philosophy, not a science"


BUT DIDNT YOU JUST TEST THE THEORY

 

[Grotesque]

Reminder that nearly all science is funded by the government. There is always an agenda.

 

[StaroRavager]

"it is important to bear in mind that any theory that cannot be directly and physically tested remains a philosophy, not a science"


BUT DIDNT YOU JUST TEST THE THEORY

Its 2018 boyo
feelings>>>>>>>>>>>>>>science

 

[chicel]

ANY COMMUNITY THAT ACCEPTS FOIDS WILL BECOME THIS

That's why you need zero tolerance foid policies. The are corrosive, repeated complaining eventually leads to beleaguered men who just relent and give in.

 

[SLAVICMorPheus]

"it is important to bear in mind that any theory that cannot be directly and physically tested remains a philosophy, not a science"


BUT DIDNT YOU JUST TEST THE THEORY

This is the book if you want I can send the link to download free. Was starting to take a liking for the author till I read this part where he starts contradicting himself like an oximoron and the number of times he acknowledge the contribution of his wife in the boom clearly shows how pussy whipped he is.

Probably reddit or Tumblr

I wish it was boyo.

 

[theson]

What a fucking word salad, where did you get this from OP?

I believe the excerpt in the screenshot is saying is something to the tune of "can a face be beautiful if no one is around to see it?"

 

[FukkenLoser]

I believe the excerpt in the screenshot is saying is something to the tune of "can a face be beautiful if no one is around to see it?"

Its saying that we can never know for sure or something like that

Actually I have no idea what its saying, if you can figure out what that shit is saying, youre probably a fucking genius

 

[SLAVICMorPheus]

I believe the excerpt in the screenshot is saying is something to the tune of "can a face be beautiful if no one is around to see it?"

KEK. The author basically trolled the whole reader base plus himself by saying in like seven that there are "observable qualities which are universally accepted" a.k.s beauty is objective. In the very next line he says "ideas and FEELINGS condition our response". There are two completely contradictory statement as ideas and feeling are not universally not even cumulative. Ideas and feelings are highly individualistic and variable.
So between line 7 and 8 he made a complete 180 to save himself from intersectional feminist outrage.

 

[theson]

KEK. The author basically trolled the whole reader base plus himself by saying in like seven that there are "observable qualities which are universally accepted" a.k.s beauty is objective. In the very next line he says "ideas and FEELINGS condition our response". There are two completely contradictory statement as ideas and feeling are not universally not even cumulative. Ideas and feelings are highly individualistic and variable.
So between line 7 and 8 he made a complete 180 to save himself from intersectional feminist outrage.

Ideas and feelings can be mutually contradictory. In fact, that is the reason for the whole "I want a nice guy" paradox, wherein women state certain preferences but choose to be with men who have the opposite traits of what they're looking for. The idea is that you want a guy who will treat you right, but the hot jock who beats your dumb ass is the one that gives you feels.

 

[Solitarian_Walker]

Women ruin everything. Men created science because women could never hope to do it, and now they want to destroy all those achievements and halt further progress. Women want to take us back to the caveman era when all that mattered was caveman Chad fucking his harem of concubines all day. Maybe that's why they want so badly to import the turd world savages, to speed up the degeneration process.

 

[iblamemyself]

Science has lost its way a long time ago.

 

[Father_Gascoigne]

They're saying beauty is universally subjective, yet all the evidence and reality says otherwise. JFL.

 

[guerillahubris]

my reaction every time some retard stupid cuck cunt says anything about looks being subjective

 

[Cuyen]

(((science)))

 

[Kobecel]

Everything is getting cucked tbh

 

[hamiltoncel]

"it is important to bear in mind that any theory that cannot be directly and physically tested remains a philosophy, not a science"


BUT DIDNT YOU JUST TEST THE THEORY

where did he test the theory. a claim isn't a test.

 

[FukkenLoser]

KEK. The author basically trolled the whole reader base plus himself by saying in like seven that there are "observable qualities which are universally accepted" a.k.s beauty is objective. In the very next line he says "ideas and FEELINGS condition our response". There are two completely contradictory statement as ideas and feeling are not universally not even cumulative. Ideas and feelings are highly individualistic and variable.
So between line 7 and 8 he made a complete 180 to save himself from intersectional feminist outrage.

where did he test the theory. a claim isn't a test.

This guy answers your question

 

[hamiltoncel]

This guy answers your question

that's no proof. everyone knows there's an objective factor to beauty (even if some people want to deny it) but just saying it's "objective" and making no mention to it whatsoever is not proof

 

[Deleted member 1983]

this is what happens when political correctness takes hold of a society, fucking disgusting

 

[Smallondick]

Reminder that nearly all science is funded by the government. There is always an agenda.

Exact! Just like they spend millions with antennas to look for ETs when it's full of UFO reports here all the time. There are secret investigations outside the civil academy.

 

[FukkenLoser]

that's no proof. everyone knows there's an objective factor to beauty (even if some people want to deny it) but just saying it's "objective" and making no mention to it whatsoever is not proof

It's a textbook that delves in depth into facial aesthetics and the standards of objective beauty

https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Facial+Aesthetics:+Concepts+and+Clinical+Diagnosis-p-9781405181921

 

[Deleted member 677]

 

[Michael15651]

Reminder that nearly all science is funded by the government. There is always an agenda.