krimpi
$lut$
★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
- Posts
- 837
He's most faggotpilled in your ass.I don’t, but he does. Forum’s most racepilled member
He's most faggotpilled in your ass.I don’t, but he does. Forum’s most racepilled member
Human momentThe way I like to think about it is that I AM AN ABUSIVE WHITE cucking men of other races in a sexual safari.
Wym?He's most faggotpilled in your ass.
we quickly realize how important blackpill is especially as curry/riceall ethnics are self hating deep down
Come on, show me where my place is, you dumb shit. Tell me, can i be happy when a shit like you is talking shit to me ?ou newfags need to learn your place here. Be glad users even acknowledge your existence, neurotic faggot
Tell me, where is my place you underage dumb shit nigger?You newfags need to learn your place here. Be glad users even acknowledge your existence, neurotic faggot
He lives rent free in your stupid faggot head.Wym?
Will only happen in your fantasy.all ethnics need to gtfo white countries asap
OkHe lives rent free in your stupid faggot head.
They won’t. So whites need to go to ethnic countries and outbreed the natives.all ethnics need to gtfo white countries asap
This guy is ashamed of his fesikh cultureI call Egyptians as fesikhs in honour of @tehgymcel420
This guy is ashamed of his fesikh culture
Whatever, she isn't, and my point is there ARE Med/Oriental women who very clearly do mog blonde nordsLooks like a tranny to me.
No, tons of anglos have black eyes. It's a meme to say they have lots of blue eyes, that's mostly Scandinavians and SlavsMost Anglos have blue eyes and dark hair is good trait.
I wish that was true, but no, only a small portion of Italians look like sand niggers, and even then it's usually whiter sand nigger like turks, syrians, and iraniansItalians are a meme, most look like sand niggers.
Bone structure is just as genetic as hair or eye color, so preserving races that have good bones is indeed preferable. and when you compare, many dark-caucasions have better bones than white-caucasionBones are irrelevant to this point. First we remove all dark skinned and dark eyed people from Earth, cause they are subhuman traits. Getting the right bone structures and such are finer details that aren’t an either-or situation.
brown eyes can be compensated with having better bones. Just look at the superman actor VS the aquaman actorDark hair is good, I’m only talking about skin and eyes.
No, it doesn't matter if its a tan or if's natural, it's still the same skin color. Compare this arab with this european. same skin colorTan skin is when whites gets a tan, not when you are a deathnic and are born like that and can get darker.
No one said they don’t. It’s the males that don’t, as white males mog all other males on average. There are Chads on every race, but the percentages are small.Whatever, she isn't, and my point is there ARE Med/Oriental women who very clearly do mog blonde nords
No, tons of anglos have black eyes. It's a meme to say they have lots of blue eyes, that's mostly Scandinavians and Slavs
No, in most Italian mob movies they look nom-white. In real life they look non-white in majority as well. It’s why in Canada they are considered visible minorities.I wish that was true, but no, only a small portion of Italians look like sand niggers, and even then it's usually whiter sand nigger like turks, syrians, and iranians
The guy on the left looks recessed and like a deathnic. He would be exterminated. And bone strucyure is a polygenetic trait and much harder to preserve, so eugenics on it will be harder. So it’s easier to keep focus on traits like eye and skin. Also, all ethnics have shittier faces on average so we can at least agree on their uselessness in future gene pools.Bone structure is just as genetic as hair or eye color, so preserving races that have good bones is indeed preferable. and when you compare, many dark-caucasions have better bones than white-caucasion
View attachment 659126View attachment 659127
They literally made aquaman’s eyes blue in the movie when the real character has poop eyes. Brutal blackpill.brown eyes can be compensated with having better bones. Just look at the superman actor VS the aquaman actor
Is that Jonny depp? He doesn’t even look white. That sand nigger on the right mogs most sand niggers so that is just a shitty comparison of the chad of one race and a below average of another.No, it doesn't matter if its a tan or if's natural, it's still the same skin color. Compare this arab with this european. same skin color
View attachment 659130
And I'm saying that mediterranean/iranians often do have better phenotypes than some nirds, such as Basque, Norid, or Bobbery phenotypesNo one said they don’t. It’s the males that don’t, as white males mog all other males on average. There are Chads on every race, but the percentages are small.
I see alot of brown europeans here with brown eyes, but yeah, guess I was wrong. Still 22% is a large amount of brits with brown eyesView attachment 659210
You’re just plain wrong on this point. Much of the brown eyes are probably ethnic immigrants anyways.
Maybe they look non white compared to nords but they do look white overallNo, in most Italian mob movies they look nom-white. In real life they look non-white in majority as well. It’s why in Canada they are considered visible minorities.
he still mogs the nord and likewise mogs many other blonde phenotypes. And no, it's usually nords thay tend to have more recessed chinsThe guy on the left looks recessed and like a deathnic.
true, but bone strcuture is still racial to a significant degree. Its the whole reason phenotypes form. Its why you can differentiate between a blonde anglo, blonde slav, and blonde chechnyanbone strucyure is a polygenetic trait and much harder to preserve, so eugenics on it will be harder.
Already proved this wrong with rhe pics aboveall ethnics have shittier faces on average
It's because he's a water man or whatever. Eye colors change alot with super Hero. However that's not really thr point. The aquaman actor still is taller and has bigger hands, skull and frame than thr superman actorThey literally made aquaman’s eyes blue in the movie when the real character has poop eyes. Brutal blackpill.
jordanian bedouinIs that Jonny depp?
He's portugeseThat sand nigger on the right mogs most sand niggers so that is just a shitty comparison of the chad of one race and a below average of another.
Cope, most Iranians look like any other deathnics. Idk why you keep bringing up them as if almost all of them aren’t subhumans. Entirety of the middle east needs to be nuked, there’s no ifs or buts about that.And I'm saying that mediterranean/iranians often do have better phenotypes than some nirds, such as Basque, Norid, or Bobbery phenotypes
That’s because in Canada many are mixed or non-Northern Europe. 22% with brown eyes is probably hugely made up by the ethnic immigrants to the country, like curries and sand niggers.I see alot of brown europeans here with brown eyes, but yeah, guess I was wrong. Still 22% is a large amount of brits with brown eyes
To you cause you are ethnic. But to whites, they are not white.Maybe they look non white compared to nords but they do look white overall
Cope. Nords don’t usually have recessed chins, this have thin faces. Which is a good trait.he still mogs the nord and likewise mogs many other blonde phenotypes. And no, it's usually nords thay tend to have more recessed chins
View attachment 659609View attachment 659610View attachment 659611View attachment 659612
And sand nigger and southern european facial structures are mogged by nordic ones. Therefore if you support eugenics, you would support those traits being eliminated.true, but bone strcuture is still racial to a significant degree. Its the whole reason phenotypes form. Its why you can differentiate between a blonde anglo, blonde slav, and blonde chechnyan
It didn’t. You just compared to asian mixed and not as attractive northern europeans. Being sand nigger is a failio and everyone knows it.Already proved this wrong with rhe pics above
Yet he looks better with blue eyes. Having blue eyes have nothing to do with being aquaman. And Henry Caville mogs Jason Mamoa, stop coping dude.It's because he's a water man or whatever. Eye colors change alot with super Hero. However that's not really thr point. The aquaman actor still is taller and has bigger hands, skull and frame than thr superman actor
What’s the point of the comparison them? They both look like ethnicsjordanian bedouin
Spain+portugal = mixed with sand niggersHe's portugese
Iranians do indeed look different compared to most other middle easterners, just like Levantines and Canarids.Cope, most Iranians look like any other deathnics. Idk why you keep bringing up them as if almost all of them aren’t subhumans. Entirety of the middle east needs to be nuked, there’s no ifs or buts about that.
Most Canadian Europeans are British or French, and I doubt they have anything aside from maybe Native American bloodThat’s because in Canada many are mixed or non-Northern Europe.
Britain has like 3 or 4% Indian/Arab/Paki population. And I doubt they're being included in the study tbh22% with brown eyes is probably hugely made up by the ethnic immigrants to the country, like curries and sand niggers.
No, many Northern European DO consider Medditerreanean European facial features to count as being whiteTo you cause you are ethnic. But to whites, they are not white.
Yes they do. Literally the description of the Savolaxid phenotypes says they tend to have short jawsNords don’t usually have recessed chins
These aren't the only blondes in existence. You're moving the goal posts. Your initial point was that being blond and blue eyed by default would make people look better, yet we can see tons of slavs who have blonde hair and blue eyes look subhuman compared to Mediterrean peopleHere’s the prototypical nordid phenotype.
View attachment 659805View attachment 659806
This phenotype is most common in Northern Europe, and also some parts of Eastern Europe.
And sand nigger and southern european facial structures are mogged by nordic ones.
Those traits dont need to be exterminated just because they're mogged by other traits. This is like saying brown haired people should be exterminated because they're mogged by blondes, or that green eyes should be exterminated because they're mogged by blue eyes. Even if Nordic phenotype does mog Med phenotype, which isn't always the case, the difference isn't so great so as to necessitate extermination. I have seen tons of blondes here in Canada who were far bigger subhumans than me.Therefore if you support eugenics, you would support those traits being eliminated.
You're moving the goal posts again. YOU said that people with blonde hair blue eyes will always look better than non-blondes, and I showed you that's not the case since TONS of blonde phenotypes among slavs look uglier than dark Med-looking phenotypesIt didn’t. You just compared to asian mixed and not as attractive northern europeans.
That is a cultural failo, I am talking of physical appearance alone.Being sand nigger is a failio and everyone knows it.
Everyone looks better with blue eyes, however, that doesn't change the fact that Jason mogs Henry and you are purely delusional if you think blue eyes changes that alone. Just look at themYet he looks better with blue eyes. Having blue eyes have nothing to do with being aquaman. And Henry Caville mogs Jason Mamoa, stop coping dude.
You were claiming a tan and "regular brown" skin look different when I first said that tans look better than pale skin on men, so I showed you you are wrong.What’s the point of the comparison them? They both look like ethnics
Not really relevant to the point.Spain+portugal = mixed with sand niggers
Bro, the first 3 dudes look like shit lol. Stop coping.Iranians do indeed look different compared to most other middle easterners, just like Levantines and Canarids.
View attachment 659910View attachment 659911View attachment 659912View attachment 659913
Yeah natives probablyMost Canadian Europeans are British or French, and I doubt they have anything aside from maybe Native American blood
Why would it not include them? Curries, rice, sand noggers, blacks, etc are all part of the british population now.Britain has like 3 or 4% Indian/Arab/Paki population. And I doubt they're being included in the study tbh
Only because they want to include the Ancient Romans and Greeks as white history and say “we waz kangz”. It’s not too different than when blacks try to claim Egypt and say the ancient ones were actually black. I know Scandinavians countries don’t consider meds to be white, but you know as well as I do it depends on entirely on your looks. If you look white, you will be seen as white. If a med has nordic features mostly, he might pass as white in Scandinavia. In America, you can look completely non-white and still pass as white.No, many Northern European DO consider Medditerreanean European facial features to count as being white
This phenotype is centred around Finland, which is a mixture of whites and asians. They are not genetically entirely northern european.Yes they do. Literally the description of the Savolaxid phenotypes says they tend to have short jaws
View attachment 659914
It doesn’t count if they are mixed with rice. I never said slavs should breed jfl, we are a subhuman race in general. I don’t consider slavs are true northern european. Just germanic and Scandinavian.These aren't the only blondes in existence. You're moving the goal posts. Your initial point was that being blond and blue eyed by default would make people look better, yet we can see tons of slavs who have blonde hair and blue eyes look subhuman compared to Mediterrean people
Brown haired males don’t get mogged by blondes. Green eyes are still light eyes, rather than poop eyed brown eyes. You are coping and looking at the exceptions to the rule. “Oh bro, I know some curries and sand niggers that mog whites, therefore they shouldn’t be subject to eugenics”. Meds are no different, overall their SMV is nowhere close to that of northern europeans. And the mogger meds are the ones with high percentage of northern european dna.Those traits dont need to be exterminated just because they're mogged by other traits. This is like saying brown haired people should be exterminated because they're mogged by blondes, or that green eyes should be exterminated because they're mogged by blue eyes. Even if Nordic phenotype does mog Med phenotype, which isn't always the case, the difference isn't so great so as to necessitate extermination. I have seen tons of blondes here in Canada who were far bigger subhumans than me.
I never said blonde hair looks better, I said blue eyes and light skin do. I was talking about in caucasoid skulls, between all europeans, sand niggers, and north indians. Blacks and rice = over already. It’s not moving a goal post, it should be pretty obvious. If I mentioned slavs or fins I would have mentioned them, but I said specifically Scandinavia and Germanic people.You're moving the goal posts again. YOU said that people with blonde hair blue eyes will always look better than non-blondes, and I showed you that's not the case since TONS of blonde phenotypes among slavs look uglier than dark Med-looking phenotypes
Sand niggers get completely mogged by north euros to another dimension. Even the white looking ones from Syria or wherever don’t help the cause because they still get height mogged by northern euros and iq mogged. There is no saving sand niggers.That is a cultural failo, I am talking of physical appearance alone.
Henry Cavill was considered the most handsome man in the world. In terms of height Henry Cavill is 6’1” while Mamoa is 6’4”. Mamoa does masculine mog him but that doesn’t mean anything. That’s like saying Shaq mogs both cause he is taller, has bugger hands, bigger skull (I think), etc. Altogether due to their face alone, women would rather fuck Henry than Mamoa, but they are both very attractive so it’s like comparing one Chad to another. You can’t use that as a reference to compare, most meds with darker skin are not mogging northern euros. That said, Mamo does look better with blue eyes. There is no doubt blue eyes would make him look better. Mamoa is a good looking mix race chad, so saying “but chad with tan skin is mogging” is a cope.Everyone looks better with blue eyes, however, that doesn't change the fact that Jason mogs Henry and you are purely delusional if you think blue eyes changes that alone. Just look at them
Taller than Herny
bigger hands
bigger skull
tan which mogs Henry's pale skin
beardmaxxed
You were claiming a tan and "regular brown" skin look different when I first said that tans look better than pale skin on men, so I showed you you are wrong.
Not really relevant to the point.
They at least look human unlike niggers and chinksBro, the first 3 dudes look like shit lol. Stop coping.
because the study is likely looking at indingienious brits. But whatever, nit really the point. I agree most brots don't have brown eyesWhy would it not include them? Curries, rice, sand noggers, blacks, etc are all part of the british population now.
But meds are genetically closer to other europeans than theh are to anatolians or levantines. Many meds very much do look white. Maybe not nordic but still whiteOnly because they want to include the Ancient Romans and Greeks as white history and say “we waz kangz”.
maybe, but ive never really talked eith scandinavians to know myself. I do have some family in norway and denmark and despite them looking med, they are treated like foreigners so you mught be right.I know Scandinavians countries don’t consider meds to be white
because what qualifies as "white enough to be white " changes based on country. America has a lower standard for who is or isnt white. If you look white, you will be seen as white.
If a med has nordic features mostly, he might pass as white in Scandinavia. In America, you can look completely non-white and still pass as white.
but they do get facially mogged by medsThis phenotype is centred around Finland, which is a mixture of whites and asians. They are not genetically entirely northern european.
you are jewish/slav?It doesn’t count if they are mixed with rice. I never said slavs should breed jfl, we are a subhuman race in general. I don’t consider slavs are true northern european. Just germanic and Scandinavian.
yes they do. By your logic, blonde mogs brownBrown haired males don’t get mogged by blondes.
trueGreen eyes are still light eyes, rather than poop eyed brown eyes.
no, they should be subject to eugenics, just not as higha prioroty as with blacks and asiansYou are coping and looking at the exceptions to the rule. “Oh bro, I know some curries and sand niggers that mog whites, therefore they shouldn’t be subject to eugenics”.
if u say soMeds are no different, overall their SMV is nowhere close to that of northern europeans. And the mogger meds are the ones with high percentage of northern european dna.
yeah, i dont deny scandinavians are at the top, but that doesnt mean other caucasions are too far offI never said blonde hair looks better, I said blue eyes and light skin do. I was talking about in caucasoid skulls, between all europeans, sand niggers, and north indians. Blacks and rice = over already. It’s not moving a goal post, it should be pretty obvious. If I mentioned slavs or fins I would have mentioned them, but I said specifically Scandinavia and Germanic people.
true. True. I knew a blonde blue eyed lebanese guy but he was like 5'4 turbo manlet.Sand niggers get completely mogged by north euros to another dimension. Even the white looking ones from Syria or wherever don’t help the cause because they still get height mogged by northern euros and iq mogged. There is no saving sand niggers.
That indian has an ugly faceThat’s like using this guy to say curries mog whites.
View attachment 659994
So you agree we are only comparing caucasoid people here. GreatThey at least look human unlike niggers and chinks
Most meds don’t look white, unless they are from certain Balkan countries. But still, many do look non-white so why leave them around? Doesn’t make much sense when there are pure white looking people in Northern Europe who look better anyways. Balkan people still get mogged as they usually have bug eyes, dark eyes, and other features more associated with curries and slavs.because the study is likely looking at indingienious brits. But whatever, nit really the point. I agree most brots don't have brown eyes
But meds are genetically closer to other europeans than theh are to anatolians or levantines. Many meds very much do look white. Maybe not nordic but still white
They are the most selective about being white because they are the most pure whites.maybe, but ive never really talked eith scandinavians to know myself. I do have some family in norway and denmark and despite them looking med, they are treated like foreigners so you mught be right.
Amerimutts cope because many of them are not fully white. There’s many whites that look non-white in America. But on a global scale, everyone looks at a certain kind of white as superior. No one looks at Greeks or Italians and thinks master race. But when they just look at someone from Norway or something, they know it’s over.because what qualifies as "white enough to be white " changes based on country. America has a lower standard for who is or isnt white
That’s a cope. Most meds look like shitbut they do get facially mogged by meds
Yes. I look whiter than almost any med, and I think even mine group isn’t good enough. I have dark eyes, which is a symbol of shit. Literal poop eyesyou are jewish/slav?
Wym?yes they do. By your logic, blonde mogs brown
If we are doing eugenics anyways, might as well do the job properly. Meds might not be as subhuman as curries, sand niggers, or rice but they are still not moggers like Northern Europeans.true
no, they should be subject to eugenics, just not as higha prioroty as with blacks and asians
Yeah, Germanic people aren’t far off. But the rest of the caucasian groups whether med, sand, slav, or curry, they stood no chance.if u say so
yeah, i dont deny scandinavians are at the top, but that doesnt mean other caucasions are too far off
Beyond brutal.true. True. I knew a blonde blue eyed lebanese guy but he was like 5'4 turbo manlet.
Not according to modeling agencies looksmax, who constantly use it as the posterboy joke of “it’s over for Gandicels” or “even gigachad can’t escape the mogging”. I thought those kinds of wide faces weren’t good either, but women are attracted to them. We are just projecting what we like on women and think they will like the same face shape as us I guess.That indian has an ugly face
Yeah.So you agree we are only comparing caucasoid people here. Great
so that blondes have someone to mog. If the whole world becomes full of nords then there will still be subhuman blondes and chad blondesMost meds don’t look white, unless they are from certain Balkan countries. But still, many do look non-white so why leave them around?
yep. Standards of whitness get more severe the more white people are. Blondes are true whites.They are the most selective about being white because they are the most pure whites.
yep, even anime kinda proves this. You always see anime characters from Italy and Greece and Turkey having blonde hair. There's an anime about Ottoman empire and this is the main character. His name is Mehmet.Amerimutts cope because many of them are not fully white. There’s many whites that look non-white in America. But on a global scale, everyone looks at a certain kind of white as superior. No one looks at Greeks or Italians and thinks master race. But when they just look at someone from Norway or something, they know it’s over.
I don't agree but whatever. Don't wanna argue that anymore.That’s a cope. Most meds look like shit
BrutalYes. I look whiter than almost any med, and I think even mine group isn’t good enough. I have dark eyes, which is a symbol of shit. Literal poop eyes
You said brunettes are not mogged by blondes. Yet you've been arguing this whole time blonde is best. By that logic, brunettes would also need eugenicsWym?
They're still the best looking black haired humans. The world should be 80% European caucsion with the remaining 20% being African, arab, asians, and indians.If we are doing eugenics anyways, might as well do the job properly. Meds might not be as subhuman as curries, sand niggers, or rice but they are still not moggers like Northern Europeans.
Maybe, but he still has gross looking lips to meNot according to modeling agencies looksmax, who constantly use it as the posterboy joke of “it’s over for Gandicels” or “even gigachad can’t escape the mogging”. I thought those kinds of wide faces weren’t good either, but women are attracted to them. We are just projecting what we like on women and think they will like the same face shape as us I gueguess.
True, but we can agree that some phenotypes (like non-white) are a massive failio. In the future, all massive failios can slowly be removed. The first step in the eugenics process would be geographically based.Yeah.
so that blondes have someone to mog. If the whole world becomes full of nords then there will still be subhuman blondes and chad blondes
Not being at the bottom doesn’t mean anything. Not being at the top = over. There’s no curry, black, or noodle whores trying to get with sand niggers and kikes. They all want Northern european whites.think about it, the read sandniggers like me and you arent at the bottom of the totem pole is because there are even bigger subhumans beneath us (indians, africans, asians)
Completely over. All the ethnic mogging was in times before photography, or even somewhat realistic painted 2D art. Whites literally took credit from the meds in Greece and Rome. Mogged again.yep. Standards of whitness get more severe the more white people are. Blondes are true whites.
yep, even anime kinda proves this. You always see anime characters from Italy and Greece and Turkey having blonde hair. There's an anime about Ottoman empire and this is the main character. His name is Mehmet.
View attachment 660062
It just happens to be that the population that is best looking also has the most blondes. The blondness in males is a signal for how white they are, and makes ethnic foids pussy leak. But for white foids, I think they prefer darker hair males since they don’t need to bleach out their own ethnic features.I don't agree but whatever. Don't wanna argue that anymore.
Brutal
You said brunettes are not mogged by blondes. Yet you've been arguing this whole time blonde is best. By that logic, brunettes would also need eugenics
Personally, I think many Eastern Europeans mog meds and they have high rates of dark hair. But whatever. You know, in the 1900s I think 40% of the world was European. But sadly blacks, curries, and rice keep breeding with the help of technology from whites and now make most of the world’s population. In 2100, 40% of the world will be black. The world is being filled with poor people who’s ancestors didn’t accomplish shit to deserve growing that much. It’s pretty bleak for the future. The small white percentage will be seen as royalty in the future while the ethnics will become lower castes. Only hope for ethnics from this humiliation is eugenics.They're still the best looking black haired humans. The world should be 80% European caucsion with the remaining 20% being African, arab, asians, and indians.
True. Although I saw some post about incel surgeries a while ago about males wanting big lips for some reason. I don’t get it.Maybe, but he still has gross looking lips to me
The most massive failos are being non caucssion. If anything, they would need to be the priority in being wiped out or bred outTrue, but we can agree that some phenotypes (like non-white) are a massive failio. In the future, all massive failios can slowly be removed. The first step in the eugenics process would be geographically based.
No, there absolutely are curry, black and noodle women going for Arabs and jews. Arabs and Jews are csucasion and that alone makes them desirable for Asian women and negro women. Indian women also prefer arab men due to whiter skin.Not being at the bottom doesn’t mean anything. Not being at the top = over. There’s no curry, black, or noodle whores trying to get with sand niggers and kikes. They all want Northern european whites.
yeah. With ethnic foids, blonde is best. For white women, black/brown with blue eyed is bestIt just happens to be that the population that is best looking also has the most blondes. The blondness in males is a signal for how white they are, and makes ethnic foids pussy leak. But for white foids, I think they prefer darker hair males since they don’t need to bleach out their own ethnic features.
40%???? Fucking insane. Whited are like 11% now. Even less if we exclude meds. Technology was a mistake. I don't even really want ethnics fully wiped out per say, their diverse looks can be appreciated, but the world needs to go from being 11% white and 89% ethnic and instead be 80% white and 20% all other ethnics.Personally, I think many Eastern Europeans mog meds and they have high rates of dark hair. But whatever. You know, in the 1900s I think 40% of the world was European. But sadly blacks, curries, and rice keep breeding with the help of technology from whites and now make most of the world’s population. In 2100, 40% of the world will be black. The world is being filled with poor people who’s ancestors didn’t accomplish shit to deserve growing that much. It’s pretty bleak for the future. The small white percentage will be seen as royalty in the future while the ethnics will become lower castes. Only hope for ethnics from this humiliation is eugenics.
cope til you rope i guess
True, I have seen noodles going out with a northern curry and an afghan. And I also have seen somali women wanting to go out with arabs. But they seem like exceptions to the rule, rather than something widespread.The most massive failos are being non caucssion. If anything, they would need to be the priority in being wiped out or bred out
No, there absolutely are curry, black and noodle women going for Arabs and jews. Arabs and Jews are csucasion and that alone makes them desirable for Asian women and negro women. Indian women also prefer arab men due to whiter skin.
Obviously it'd not and never will be on the same level as blonde Europeans, but there clearly are asian/indian/black women who do want arab/Jewish men. Granted I will admit that is due to Arabs and jews being CLOSER to whitness than their own races
View attachment 660079View attachment 660081
Yeah, humans looking different regions evolving to different environments is obviously important for survival. If only northern europeans were left, we would lose all the innovations our bodies came up with to survive in all those different conditions.yeah. With ethnic foids, blonde is best. For white women, black/brown with blue eyed is best
40%???? Fucking insane. Whited are like 11% now. Even less if we exclude meds. Technology was a mistake. I don't even really want ethnics fully wiped out per say, their diverse looks can be appreciated, but the world needs to go from being 11% white and 89% ethnic and instead be 80% white and 20% all other ethnics.
Thread 'Italians are giga ethnic, look at this scene from the irishman' https://looksmax.org/threads/italians-are-giga-ethnic-look-at-this-scene-from-the-irishman.478569/No, in most Italian mob movies they look nom-white. In real life they look non-white in majority as well. It’s why in Canada they are considered visible minorities.
Man, the people on looksmax are hilarious.Thread 'Italians are giga ethnic, look at this scene from the irishman' https://looksmax.org/threads/italians-are-giga-ethnic-look-at-this-scene-from-the-irishman.478569/
@Copexodius Maximus
Yep indeed , unfortunately now it's getting infested and taken over by Normies from TikTokMan, the people on looksmax are hilarious.
Not meall ethnics are self hating deep down