You can't keep saying this without acknowledging where it comes from. Sociopathy is selected sexual behavior. Dodging and weaving through my question won't absolve you or the hoes you defend of this.
Its not advantageous for them to do so, so they won't.
Sociopaths aren't sociopaths just for sexual reasons. There are lots of ways sociopaths are made. But we are talking about people who use and abuse people for sex.
Regardless of why you're a sociopath, it is not acceptable to be a sociopath for any reason, especially just for sex. Yes, I understand it very well, lack of sex makes a man mad. But Ricardo López was mad. And his attempt on Björk was still unjustified. Understandable, yes. We can even sympathize with how lonely he was. But his attacks are still reprehensible, we are against them, specifically because they're reprehensible. Not because there are more efficient ways to use/hurt people for your gain. We are against them because it's bad to hurt people, and the people who you want sex from don't deserve you hurting them for it.
Sex is the main motivator behind a lot of human behavior. Its why you post here as a 40 something year old virgin.
As badly as I want the things I want, and I want them very badly, I can't be a shitty person to get them. Posting on Incels.co doesn't make me a shitty person. But lying to someone or taking advantage of someone, that would make me a shitty person.
Yes it does you retard. Ugly men are less likely to cheat than good looking ones, simply because they lack options. Thus they are forced to be honest or they risk losing their sole sexual and romantic outlet. How are you this retarded and posting here?
I'm not telling them to focus on ugly men. Actually read my posts. I'm telling them to adjust their preferences so that they stop getting tricked. One of the preferences they could adjust is to stop focusing on bone length. I like that you acknowledge in an understated way that ugly men are currently more honest and less manipulative than chads. Great way to undermine your argument.
Hold on, first you talk up the benefits of dating ugly men, then you say you're not talking about ugly men? I'm asking you who these men are that women should focus their attention on.
Lemme explain what I mean by "manipulative." Maybe that's not what's being communicated. I think you think we're talking about women seeking out men with open character flaws. That's not what "manipulative" is. What I mean is, women ARE seeking good men. Kind and devoted men. The problem is, there are more manipulative and bad men than there are devoted and good men. Manipulative men who know how to trick women into believing they're good and devoted. That's what's happening here. That's why women like the woman who posted this post complain. Because they were led to believe that the men they commit to are good, but then they turn out to not be good. That's "manipulative." They're not seeking out bad men. They're seeking out the men you say to seek out. Good men. Because you're not talking about ugly incels, you're talking about men who show themselves to be good and devoted.
Frothy, you seem hellbent on divorcing human behavior (sociopathy) from looks, society's treatment of said looks, and female sexual selection. Why is this?
Humans in society aren't supposed to be assholes. It's a failure of character. We're supposed to be civil to one another. Being an asshole is not good. And being handsome doesn't mean you're an asshole. Nor does being ugly mean you're loving and tolerant and generous. There are people here, understandably so, that are selfish and angry. Are we assholes because the world picked on us? Is Chad an asshole because he can get away with it? In either case it doesn't matter. It's bad to be an asshole. Women like the one from that post are seeking out non-assholes, and advocating that the assholes of the world stop being assholes. She never wanted assholes, it's just assholes have a way of tricking women like her into thinking they aren't assholes.
