Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Ridiculous concept - Stochastic terrorism

AsiaCel

AsiaCel

shalom goyim
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Posts
30,118
Online time
15h 27m
Ridiculous concept - Stochastic terrorism

If you have read news about incels, especially the so called counter extremist websites about us, you'll know that they sometimes call our content stochastic terrorism (especially the ER saints thing), so I'll tell you what it is.

This is a fairly recent concept of "indirect incitement" of attack.

From Wikipedia:

"Stochastic terrorism is an analytic description used in scholarship and counterterrorism to describe a mass-mediated process in which hostile public rhetoric, repeated and amplified across communication platforms, elevates the statistical risk of ideologically motivated violence by unknown individuals, even without direct coordination or explicit orders.[1][2]"
In human language, the idea is that if an influencer spreads hate towards a group, that it raises the possibility of someone causing an attack on said group by creating a hostile atmosphere

Trump is viewed as a stochastic terrorist by some.

They want to surpass any "hate speech".

So let's take this concept to its logical conclusion, here are some scenarios that you can be blamed for:

1. You posted "I hate Walmart" and someone shot up a Walmart later.
2. You posted "can the migrants just stop complaining" and someone stabbed a migrant
3. You said "I hate fat people" and a new Facebook group spun up to hate fat people

Do you know how ridiculous that sounds, and how dystopian it would be, if all "indirect incitement" is banned? You'd be busted for something as innoncent as saying "bus drivers are assholes".

If someone unstable joined our forums, learned the blackpill, and shot up foids, why should we be blamed? People like that will shoot shit up anyway (though targets may be changed); I get if someone DMed him AR-15 instructions and told him to go ER, that's a crime, but labeling hateposting as terrorism is unfair and paranoid imo.
 
Last edited:
Nobody should be punished for words on a screen . But apaarently ( Man ) do , kek :feelsclown:

People are really sensitive and overprotecting when Woman are the target audience , eh .
 
We live in a hellscape.
 
Ehh first the media applies it to us and then they just want to silence us by saying that we do it.
 
Wouldn't this make leftoids on twitter terrorists? They literally talk about how they want someone to kill Donald Trump every single week.
 
Anyone saying that hate speech/schotastic terrorism exist and should be restricted/prosecuted should unironicaly face anti-free speech criminal charges.
 
I blame shrinks and normie researchers for coming up with each new shitty term like this
 

Similar threads

hikkicel
Replies
3
Views
633
taoistcel
T
RealSchizo
Replies
7
Views
568
TooSomething
TooSomething
CursedMutantSoul
Replies
11
Views
572
CursedMutantSoul
CursedMutantSoul
End Hypergamy
Replies
56
Views
3K
koolaidcel
koolaidcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top