AsiaCel
shalom goyim
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2017
- Posts
- 30,118
- Online time
- 15h 27m
Ridiculous concept - Stochastic terrorism
If you have read news about incels, especially the so called counter extremist websites about us, you'll know that they sometimes call our content stochastic terrorism (especially the ER saints thing), so I'll tell you what it is.
This is a fairly recent concept of "indirect incitement" of attack.
From Wikipedia:
Trump is viewed as a stochastic terrorist by some.
They want to surpass any "hate speech".
So let's take this concept to its logical conclusion, here are some scenarios that you can be blamed for:
1. You posted "I hate Walmart" and someone shot up a Walmart later.
2. You posted "can the migrants just stop complaining" and someone stabbed a migrant
3. You said "I hate fat people" and a new Facebook group spun up to hate fat people
Do you know how ridiculous that sounds, and how dystopian it would be, if all "indirect incitement" is banned? You'd be busted for something as innoncent as saying "bus drivers are assholes".
If someone unstable joined our forums, learned the blackpill, and shot up foids, why should we be blamed? People like that will shoot shit up anyway (though targets may be changed); I get if someone DMed him AR-15 instructions and told him to go ER, that's a crime, but labeling hateposting as terrorism is unfair and paranoid imo.
If you have read news about incels, especially the so called counter extremist websites about us, you'll know that they sometimes call our content stochastic terrorism (especially the ER saints thing), so I'll tell you what it is.
This is a fairly recent concept of "indirect incitement" of attack.
From Wikipedia:
In human language, the idea is that if an influencer spreads hate towards a group, that it raises the possibility of someone causing an attack on said group by creating a hostile atmosphere"Stochastic terrorism is an analytic description used in scholarship and counterterrorism to describe a mass-mediated process in which hostile public rhetoric, repeated and amplified across communication platforms, elevates the statistical risk of ideologically motivated violence by unknown individuals, even without direct coordination or explicit orders.[1][2]"
Trump is viewed as a stochastic terrorist by some.
They want to surpass any "hate speech".
So let's take this concept to its logical conclusion, here are some scenarios that you can be blamed for:
1. You posted "I hate Walmart" and someone shot up a Walmart later.
2. You posted "can the migrants just stop complaining" and someone stabbed a migrant
3. You said "I hate fat people" and a new Facebook group spun up to hate fat people
Do you know how ridiculous that sounds, and how dystopian it would be, if all "indirect incitement" is banned? You'd be busted for something as innoncent as saying "bus drivers are assholes".
If someone unstable joined our forums, learned the blackpill, and shot up foids, why should we be blamed? People like that will shoot shit up anyway (though targets may be changed); I get if someone DMed him AR-15 instructions and told him to go ER, that's a crime, but labeling hateposting as terrorism is unfair and paranoid imo.
Last edited:





