RoastieBeef
Mythic
★
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2018
- Posts
- 4,510
JFL, horribly low IQ take. Women select for entirely useless traits, and female sexual selection is dysgenic if anything. Not only that, but even in some alternate reality where he is right, it wouldn't matter, since the same undesirable traits would be passed down through women.
Doesn't surprise me that this Spencer is a simp though
what he thinks hypergamy will produce:he thinks that his hapa kids have SMV in a world with hipergamy
hope that cumskin's kids all never breed, and then he dies a horrible painful deathhe thinks that his hapa kids have SMV in a world with hipergamy
Everyone conveniently ignores that hypergamy still means ugly females are reproducing and genes that make people look ugly are still circulating in the gene pool even if ugly males are no longer able to reproduce.
Love how people think this is dabbing on haters by bringing a baby with genetic defects into the world.
No one really accused Richard Spencer of ever being smart right? He's a figure head put into prominence by the media to represent "dissident" white ethnonationalists.>Women select for traits that were useful 50,000 years ago.
>He thinks that is applicable to modern society.
Even if females selected for positive traits, they would still make up a big portion of the problem; even the most genetic trash females will have children.
Ooogah boogggahh. We can see right here what mate selection has done to his IQ genes.
ExactlyEveryone conveniently ignores that hypergamy still means ugly females are reproducing and genes that make people look ugly are still circulating in the gene pool even if ugly males are no longer able to reproduce.
Jfl tbhwhat he thinks hypergamy will produce:
View attachment 309203
what hypergamy actually produces:
View attachment 309204
Wait what? top kek. The white nationalist is going for ethnic foidsguess what Spencer, hypergamy is literally the reason you had to go for ethnic girls despite being a white nationalist. JFL
Is Schopen cucked? I was thinking about reading his worksSchopencuck tier reasoning
View attachment 309335
JFL, horribly low IQ take. Women select for entirely useless traits, and female sexual selection is dysgenic if anything. Not only that, but even in some alternate reality where he is right, it wouldn't matter, since the same undesirable traits would be passed down through women.
Doesn't surprise me that this Spencer is a simp though
Yeah he's a faggot. Shitting out some simp's off spring that was gracious enough to take you in when you're a used up rag doll at 35 and have rotten eggs after having ridden the cock carousel for 20 years desperately trying to get Chad to commit to you in vain when you should've been breeding is the epitome of dysgenics if anything, and every stat backs this up. If these people are to be believed, the jews introducing Tinder into the genepool is the best thing that's ever happened to the human genepool. White nationalism is SIMP nationalism@DeformAspergerCel look at this shit.
I'm pretty sure you can. It just takes more time.You can't breed out a trait of only one side of the equation breeds it out
Most of his ideas are good or at least interesting, this one is cucked though.Is Schopen cucked? I was thinking about reading his works
This tbh.White nationalism is SIMP nationalism
Which one?Most of his ideas are good or at least interesting, this one is cucked though.
This tbh.
Which one?
I thought richard spencer wrote it jfl
Tbh I'm not even sure which essay this is from, as I don't immediately recall it.
Ahh I found it, it's one cucked paragraph of Schopenhauer's "On Women", which is for the most part otherwise good.I thought richard spencer wrote it jfl
I am not sure what he tryna say. Is he saying that female hypergamy is a bigger imperative than loyalty within the bounds of marriage?Ahh I found it, it's one cucked paragraph of Schopenhauer's "On Women", which is for the most part otherwise good.
Yeah it seems to imply that actual cucking is somehow good because of "nature", jfl. Even though in nature women wouldn't be the ones choosing, so I'm not really sure where he is going with this.I am not sure what he tryna say. Is he saying that female hypergamy is a bigger imperative than loyalty within the bounds of marriage?
Schopencuck tier reasoning
View attachment 309335
to be fair, it's not an unreasonable hypothesis if you assume some of the things men have projected unto women and enforced through social stigma is actually intrinsic to female nature, but as it turns out, and as various works such as JD Unwin's "sex and culture" has proven, letting female sexuality loose can only ever result in the deterioration and collapse of civilization as it will create too immense sexual inequalities between men for peaceful coexistence to ever be possible. What's especially baffling in Spencer's case is that I presume he notices the sexual and moral decay of modern life yet simultaneously claims that one of the primary causes if not the primary cause (pushed by organized jewry incidentally, which he claims to be against) is goodAhh I found it, it's one cucked paragraph of Schopenhauer's "On Women", which is for the most part otherwise good.
That's a good point, if we actually lived in Schopenhauer's time then what he is saying might not seem wholly unreasonable.to be fair, it's not an unreasonable hypothesis if you assume some of the things men have projected unto women and enforced through social stigma is actually intrinsic to female nature, but as it turns out, and as various works such as JD Unwin's "sex and culture" has proven, letting female sexuality loose can only ever result in the deterioration and collapse of civilization as it will create too immense sexual inequalities between men for peaceful coexistence to ever be possible.
JFL, true. I'm not sure how Spencer can genuinely believe what he is claiming, idk, maybe he doesn't believe it.What's especially baffling in Spencer's case is that I presume he notices the sexual and moral decay of modern life yet simultaneously claims that one of the primary causes if not the primary cause (pushed by organized jewry incidentally, which he claims to be against) is good
I'm always less harsh on historical figures that didn't live in the times we live in now being slightly bluepilled on female nature but in Spencer's case that obviously goes out the window
Which primary cause?to be fair, it's not an unreasonable hypothesis if you assume some of the things men have projected unto women and enforced through social stigma is actually intrinsic to female nature, but as it turns out, and as various works such as JD Unwin's "sex and culture" has proven, letting female sexuality loose can only ever result in the deterioration and collapse of civilization as it will create too immense sexual inequalities between men for peaceful coexistence to ever be possible. What's especially baffling in Spencer's case is that I presume he notices the sexual and moral decay of modern life yet simultaneously claims that one of the primary causes if not the primary cause (pushed by organized jewry incidentally, which he claims to be against) is good
I'm always less harsh on historical figures that didn't live in the times we live in now being slightly bluepilled on female nature but in Spencer's case that obviously goes out the window
hypergamyWhich primary cause?
Oh. I'm just lowiqhypergamy
He says controversial things in order to get attention, and spur debate.JFL, true. I'm not sure how Spencer can genuinely believe what he is claiming, idk, maybe he doesn't believe it.
Exactly, it's dysgenic, outright anti-civilization. Women make terrible eugenicists.He says controversial things in order to get attention, and spur debate.
As concerns eugenics, what must be taken into consideration is what traits are being selected for, and how are they adaptive to the ideal society.
If the traits that are being selected for (in this case, by women) is low-IQ psychopathy with a strong jawline, this is far from eugenic, unless your ideal society is a barren dystopia plagued by war.
he will be sorrily disappointed when hundreds of millions of africans start pouring over in waves into Europe as administered by the UN, and the European men living there will be too busy roping, going ER or chopping their cocks off because no woman wants them to defend his precious western white civilizationThe White race dying out due to low fertility rates as roasties on birth control fuck alcoholic Chads/Tyrones is "eugenic"
Richard Spencer is apparently no longer a White Nationalist.
@wereqryan thoughts?Schopencuck tier reasoning
View attachment 309335
I was gonna say this.Doesn't eugenics have to work on both sides, male and female? You can't breed out a trait of only one side of the equation breeds it out
JFL, horribly low IQ take. Women select for entirely useless traits, and female sexual selection is dysgenic if anything. Not only that, but even in some alternate reality where he is right, it wouldn't matter, since the same undesirable traits would be passed down through women.
Doesn't surprise me that this Spencer is a simp though
guess what Spencer, hypergamy is literally the reason you had to go for ethnic girls despite being a white nationalist. JFL
No one really accused Richard Spencer of ever being smart right? He's a figure head put into prominence by the media to represent "dissident" white ethnonationalists.
female sexual selection is dysgenic if anything.
What a fucking retard. Women who are 5’2 and breed with Chad end up producing self hating manlet sons who will go on to hate their own mothers because they only dated tall man and they know exactly what their own flesh and blood thinks of them because of their short height.
It’s dysgenic in nature and has been a disaster for the West. It has produced millions of angry, bitter young men who are just waiting for the right opportunity to burn this shit to its foundations.