Blackpill Rices Mog Curries According to 10th Century Persian Author!? BRUTAL CURRYPILL!

[Wiseman]

Abu Zayd al-Sirafi was a Persian Muslim traveler who lived during the Abbasid period. His book, 'al-Sirafi's Journey' ('Ancient Accounts of India and China' in English), documents the customs and habits of the Indians and the Chinese that he encountered during his travel to the two countries, as well as their various cities and their governments. Obviously, he was more interested in their habits than their looks, but he does comment on the latter occasionally, and in one passing remark he says it flatly,

The Chinese are more handsome than the Indians, and come nearer to the Arabs, not only in countenance, but in their dress, in their ways of riding, and in their processional ceremonies. They wear long garments, and girdles in form of belts, or baldrics.

(I don't know what he means by saying the Chinese are closer to Arabs 'in countenance', because that's clearly wrong; Arabs more resemble the Indians than they do the Chinese.)

In another remark, he claims that he encountered many blind and diseased folk in India, whereas in China such people were uncommon, and concludes that the air in China is 'healthier'. It seems, then, that rices mogged curries not only in looks, but also in health and general well-being.

Even back in the 10th century, it was still over for curries.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

He might have been right at the time, but when the Mughals were in power, Hindustan was the most richest state in the entire world, owning 23% of the world's wealth. Then the British eventually came and stole basically all of it.

 

[Wiseman]

He might have been right at the time, but when the Mughals were in power, Hindustan was the most richest state in the entire world, owning 23% of the world's wealth. Then the British eventually came and stole basically all of it.

True, the Mughal empire was quite rich. But the invention of hookah was a mistake.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

True, the Mughal empire was quite rich. But the invention of hookah was a mistake.

Did they invent it? Leave it to brown folks to create something that's a lot dangerous than smoking cigarettes. JFL.

Muh brits stole everything mindset! India was invaded many times by based Muslimcels and they also stole a lot of precious commodities from temples and what not. True that britfags exploited curries more than Muslims, but they also modernized a very very backward shithold landscape with railways, modern economics, universities, etc. The fact is that curries are a subhuman substandard species that can't even keep their countries clean.

The Mughals were Islamic, though. The British did loot South Asia, this is a fact that is supported even by white historians themselves. The Mughal era is when Hindustan became a Muslim state, even though its inhabitants were 83% Hindu. And now these shitskin hindu dindus are rabidly against Islam even though Islamic leaders brought them nothing but good.

 

[HowCanSheSlap]

Water is wet. Average curry (male and female) is 2/10. Average rice (male and female) is 4/10.

Agreed. But only in general terms. If you look at giga-Chadpreets vs giga-Changs the giga-Chadpreet rival giga-Chad. Examples like Imran Abbas, Hitrikh Roshan or Zayn Malik mog the best rices you will ever see. Same with women. Bollywood women are hotter than the foids of Hollywood - not only my opnion btw.

 

[Blackpill Rage]

He might have been right at the time, but when the Mughals were in power, Hindustan was the most richest state in the entire world, owning 23% of the world's wealth. Then the British eventually came and stole basically all of it.

Shitskin hindu cope.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Shitskin hindu cope.

JFL, shitskin hindus hate the Mughals.

 

[Deleted member 2686]

He might have been right at the time, but when the Mughals were in power, Hindustan was the most richest state in the entire world, owning 23% of the world's wealth. Then the British eventually came and stole basically all of it.

but Mughal rulers were HAPA Changs

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

but Mughal rulers were HAPA Changs

They had Turkic/Central Asian origins, yes--but they also followed Islam.

Before the Mughals settled, the Muslim invaders stole a lot. Look it up. And yes, the british stole a lot as well; I'm not denying anything here.

If you are talking about the Durrani Empire, then you are correct. However, the Durrani Empire did not rule Hindustan, unlike the Mughals. More importantly, the British are the ones that reduced the country's world GDP from 23% to 2%, whereas the Mughals were the ones that made Hindustan as rich as they were.

 

[Deleted member 17419]

Bollywood women are hotter than the foids of Hollywood - not only my opnion btw.

JFL copemaxxed.

 

[Wiseman]

Bollywood women are hotter than the foids of Hollywood - not only my opnion btw.

I completely agree, but keep in mind that yellow hair worshipers are now going to swarm you like locusts and accuse you of being a coper.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Once again, I'm not disagreeing with the facts that you're posting about the british harming india. What I'm saying is that regardless of the harm caused by british, india would've still been a very fundamentally backward economy devoid of technological innovations. The principal reason for this is the lack of innovative and entrepreneurial mindset of the races in the subcontinental region. There is no spirit of inquiry, no questioning of societal norms, no existentialism. Just following rules made by others. This is the reason why the renaissance and industrial revolution never occurred organically on its own inside india without cultural contact with europeans. The country would've remained backward even if the british didn't steal anything. Indians have had a lot of freedom since their freedom, and yet even today they continue to rely on foreign investments and european technologies to build their factories, plants, cars, appliances, etc. There's very little innovation going on within the country that's driven by its own people. Contrast that with Korea, Japan and now China. These countries remained backward like India but initiated rapid industrialization. Japan and South Korea in particular have been super innovative. These cultures have a craftsmanship and innovation mindset.
Its time to stop victimizing yourself by blaming others. its time to recognize your culture's own fundamental shortcomings. Its time to take the blackpill.

This is completely nonsensical. You fail to grasp the damage the British have done outweighs the damage done by non-ruling Islamic states by far.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

No you idiot. You just can't accept the true inferiority of your race and existence. It doesn't matter that the damage done by brits outweighs the damage done by muslims. What I'm saying is that Indians are a fundamentally backward and low class race. They are unhygienic, lack planning and organization, followers, uninnovative, and also excessively risk averse and conservative. I've lived in that country and you wouldn't believe how many times I've been shut down when I spoke of starting a business.

Keep coping, aren't you an Arab? You cannot speak about inferiority. And clearly you are the biggest idiot here because you think I am defending Indians.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

How am I coping here? You're the one coping by blaming others. I'm curry but actually blackpilled unlike you, who thinks they are blackpilled but are actually not. I've looked into the abyss long and hard and confronted the worst of existence.

I know you're not defending indians. You're shifting too much of the blame onto others, thereby not confronting the true subhumanity of your race. This is a coping mechanism on your part in order to not feel the pain of your subhumanity.

It is not "shifting blame" when it actually happened, though. British historians have said the exact same thing, so how is it "shifting blame" when I say that Hindustan has been looted completely dry by the British, reducing the 23% world GDP to less than 2%? I am stating facts, and you are not blackpilled for making weird claims, either.

 

[Sparrow's Song]

JFL, shitskin hindus hate the Mughals.

The Mughals were the most Tmaxxed curries that subcontinent had seen in a while.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

The Mughals were the most Tmaxxed curries that subcontinent had seen in a while.

I have to respectfully disagree this time. I will tell you why. Because the Mughals were descendants from the Mongols, which is obvious because of their Turkic influences and thus their ancestors were dominated by the Mongols. However, they were not in power when Mongols were at their peak, of course. Those that were in power when the Mongols were at their peak was the Delhi Sultanate, and they were pretty much the only power to defeat the Mongols. They were the only ones to have killed tens of thousands of Mongols and enslaved their women and kids. This is very impressive when you consider the fact that the Mongols destroyed any place they went to and were able to defeat any enemy they had. Well, almost any, that is. But, the Mughals were the successors of the Delhi Sultanate two centuries later so I can see why you approve of them.

 

[Sparrow's Song]

I have to respectfully disagree this time. I will tell you why. Because the Mughals were descendants from the Mongols, which is obvious because of their Turkic influences and thus their ancestors were dominated by the Mongols. However, they were not in power when Mongols were at their peak, of course. Those that were in power when the Mongols were at their peak was the Delhi Sultanate, and they were pretty much the only power to defeat the Mongols. They were the only ones to have killed tens of thousands of Mongols and enslaved their women and kids. This is very impressive when you consider the fact that the Mongols destroyed any place they went to and were able to defeat any enemy they had. Well, almost any, that is. But, the Mughals were the successors of the Delhi Sultanate two centuries later so I can see why you approve of them.

The Delhi Sultanate went ER on mongolcels... Pretty badass.

How did curryland get so cucked?
Must have been the cumskins.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

The Delhi Sultanate went ER on mongolcels... Pretty badass.

How did curryland get so cucked?
Must have been the cumskins.

Definitely badass. I think curryland got cucked mostly because of cumskins, indeed. Back when the Mughals were in power, 83% of the population were Hindus. Eventually, the Sikhs came into power but they were defeated by the British. There is a classic tactic the British used, the "divide and conquer" tactic, to ensure that the locals would be loyal to the British, while at the same time seeing other locals as the enemies. When you do this, you immediately cuck yourself. That, coupled with the slave mentality the curries have inherited is why curryland is so cucked. It should be of no surprise that the Hindus are now the ruling majority, and that they reek of inferiority by trying to erase all Islamic aspects from their history books, which includes the Mughal era. Curryland is beyond cucked, to say the least.

 

[HowCanSheSlap]

JFL copemaxxed.

Katrina Kaif, Deepika Padukone, Aishwarya Rai mog the shit out of Megan Fox, Kim K or Kendall Jenner and the like. Or any white women possible. I agree white women are hotter on average than any other race but they can NEVER look exotic.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Agreed. But only in general terms. If you look at giga-Chadpreets vs giga-Changs the giga-Chadpreet rival giga-Chad. Examples like Imran Abbas, Hitrikh Roshan or Zayn Malik mog the best rices you will ever see. Same with women. Bollywood women are hotter than the foids of Hollywood - not only my opnion btw.

I am actually quite surprised Imran Abbas has been mentioned here. I saw him on a truerateme scale as well, but he is considered a 7 there which I think is a bit too low.

 

[HowCanSheSlap]

I am actually quite surprised Imran Abbas has been mentioned here. I saw him on a truerateme scale as well, but he is considered a 7 there which I think is a bit too low.

He's like the Paki equivalent of Lachowski. Anyone saying he or someone like Zayn Malik (5'8 btw) doesn't give gigachads a run for their money (facially) is JBWcoping.

 

[Deleted member 19079]

culture had a lot to do with how he rated the two races tbh

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

He's like the Paki equivalent of Lachowski. Anyone saying he or someone like Zayn Malik (5'8 btw) doesn't give gigachads a run for their money (facially) is JBWcoping.

Wow, this site is not filled with complete dumbasses? Color me surprised. You are spot on bro.

 

[Deleted member 15752]

Rice mogs them in terms of advancing cultures and civilizations or maintaining present ones.

But in terms of purely a genetic potential alone and a higher looks ceiling? Curries mog.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Rice mogs them in terms of advancing cultures and civilizations or maintaining present ones.

But in terms of purely a genetic potential alone? Curries mog.

Isn't the Indus Valley Civilisation supposed to be the oldest civilization in the world, though, pre-dating the Mesapotamians, and in turn, the Chinese civilization? They found some stuff that strongly suggested this.

 

[BrendioEEE]

white historians

 

[Deleted member 15752]

Isn't the Indus Valley Civilisation supposed to be the oldest civilization in the world, though, pre-dating the Mesapotamians? They found some stuff that strongly suggested this.

True no denying. But the Chinese made their own cultures and other things while indians simply used ideas that were left over from the Aryan inhabitants of India. Or altered the language such as blacks alter the english language with their own words.

As of recent, chinks are having better ideas to better their own race and advance their own racial and political ideas. Which is what matters.

But as for the looks ceiling, that stands true.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

View attachment 153059

Haha is it just a coincidence you posted a Dutch pic?

True no denying. But the Chinese made their own cultures and other things while indians simply used ideas that were left over from the Aryan inhabitants of India. Or altered the language such as blacks alter the english language with their own words.

As of recent, chinks are having better ideas to better their own race and advance their own racial and political ideas. Which is what matters.

But as for the looks ceiling, that stands true.

Alright, so you are speaking about developments made rather than which civilization came first. Got it.

 

[Wiseman]

culture had a lot to do with how he rated the two races tbh

Shitskin Hindu cope.

Isn't the Indus Valley Civilisation supposed to be the oldest civilization in the world, though, pre-dating the Mesapotamians, and in turn, the Chinese civilization? They found some stuff that strongly suggested this.

No civilization predates Mesopotamian civilization, but you're right in saying that it preceded China.

 

[Deleted member 19079]

Shitskin Hindu cope.

tfw im rice

 

[Deleted member 15752]

Alright, so you are speaking about developments made rather than which civilization came first. Got it.

Yea, its still based that they came before. But nonetheless whats the point if you dont develop that civilization to compete against other races and to overall better the future of your race. Eventually you fall so far behind that others overtake you.

 

[Wiseman]

tfw im rice

Piss skin chink cope.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Shitskin Hindu cope.


No civilization predates Mesopotamian civilization, but you're right in saying that it preceded China.

"With its impressive pyramids and complex rules, Ancient Egypt may seem to many the epitome of an advanced early civilisation.

But new evidence suggests the Indus Valley Civilisation in India and Pakistan, famed for its well-planned cities and impressive crafts, predates Egypt and Mesopotamia."

Indus Valley civilisation may pre-date Egypt's pharoahs

Already considered one of the oldest civilisations in the world, experts now believe the Indus Valley Civilisation, based in what is now India and Pakistan, is 8,000 years old.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Yea, its still based that they came before. But nonetheless whats the point if you dont develop that civilization to compete against other races and to overall better the future of your race. Eventually you fall so far behind that others overtake you.

I get your point. Point in case; no toilets in India.

 

[Deleted member 18515]

do you expect me to read this wall of text? @Wiseman, I read ur thread but it's getting spammed down!!!!

 

[Deleted member 19079]

Piss skin chink cope.

brutal.

on a serious note though, putting culture aside curries mog rices hard tbh

Indid

Sinid

we werent designed to look masculine. it is over

 

[Wiseman]

"With its impressive pyramids and complex rules, Ancient Egypt may seem to many the epitome of an advanced early civilisation.

But new evidence suggests the Indus Valley Civilisation in India and Pakistan, famed for its well-planned cities and impressive crafts, predates Egypt and Mesopotamia."

I'll gladly accept this new evidence once it becomes established history and it is proven that it's not driven by pride and nationalism like usually is the case.

do you expect me to read this wall of text? @Wiseman, I read ur thread but it's getting spammed down!!!!

Thank you for for taking your time to write this post, @Toadman, but I'm afraid I haven't read a single word of it.

brutal.

on a serious note though, putting culture aside curries mog rices hard tbh

Indid

Sinid

we werent designed to look masculine. it is over

Most Indians don't look masculine either, and I don't think masculinity matters much when you look subhuman, but it could be argued that top-tier curries mog top-tier rices.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

I'll gladly accept this new evidence once it becomes established history and it is proven that it's not driven by pride and nationalism like usually is the case.

It's published by a British channel, not an Indian channel. I think you can safely accept the new evidence.

 

[Deleted member 18515]

doesn't matter, tbh. ricecels and currycels are equal in terms of looks.

 

[Blackpill Rage]

doesn't matter, tbh. ricecels and currycels are equal in terms of looks.

Rice > curry. This is undisputable fact.

 

[Deleted member 19079]

I'll gladly accept this new evidence once it becomes established history and it is proven that it's not driven by pride and nationalism like usually is the case.


Thank you for for taking your time to write this post, @Toadman, but I'm afraid I haven't read a single word of it.


Most Indians don't look masculine either, and I don't think masculinity matters much when you look subhuman, but it could be argued that top-tier curries mog top-tier rices.

having a caucasoid helps a lot though. conventionally attractive features such as a prominent brow ridge, deep set eyes, high nose bridge, are obscure in mongoloids. which is y most attractive rices are just pretty boys, very rarely do they fit the chad phenotype. imo curries mog rice in terms of facial structure, but rices get a smv boost from culture, being taller and having light skin

 

[Deleted member 18515]

light skin

ITs over for bbcricecels

 

[Deleted member 19079]

View attachment 153073
ITs over for bbcricecels

brutal niggerlips on that ricecel tbh

 

[Deleted member 18515]

Cumskin > everything !!!!!

 

[omnilet]

no man, curries mog ricecels here. nobody likes gooks here, the sooner you take the gookpill the better.

 

[Blackpill Rage]

no man, curries mog ricecels here. nobody likes gooks here, the sooner you take the gookpill the better.

 

[Monk of Failure]

Curries were very self centered and egotistical too, as a central Asian writer named Al-Baruni wrote "Hindoos believe there is no country as best as theirs". Lol

Abu Zayd al-Sirafi was a Persian Muslim traveler who lived during the Abbasid period. His book, 'al-Sirafi's Journey' ('Ancient Accounts of India and China' in English), documents the customs and habits of the Indians and the Chinese that he encountered during his travel to the two countries, as well as their various cities and their governments. Obviously, he was more interested in their habits than their looks, but he does comment on the latter occasionally, and in one passing remark he says it flatly,

The Chinese are more handsome than the Indians, and come nearer to the Arabs, not only in countenance, but in their dress, in their ways of riding, and in their processional ceremonies. They wear long garments, and girdles in form of belts, or baldrics.

(I don't know what he means by saying the Chinese are closer to Arabs 'in countenance', because that's clearly wrong; Arabs more resemble the Indians than they do the Chinese.)

In another remark, he claims that he encountered many blind and diseased folk in India, whereas in China such people were uncommon, and concludes that the air in China is 'healthier'. It seems, then, that rices mogged curries not only in looks, but also in health and general well-being.

Even back in the 10th century, it was still over for curries.

He probably meant skin color I guess. Persians and Levant Arabs are lighter than Indians and are of same color as Chinese.